This is a talk page of the IP address.

• To add a new message, please click the button that says "Add topic", then fill out in the subject and message, then click "Submit.
• Always sign yourself with "~~~~"

Anonymous users from this IP address have beenblocked temporarily from editing for persistently makingdisruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page hasalso been revoked.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to theUnblock Ticket Request System.  Ad Orientem (talk)21:06, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is ashared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit bylogging in.

I've recently added the{{redirect shell}} template in order to categorize redirects.

Also, Some of the templates are used by itself instead of using the{{redirect shell}} template.74.195.77.161 (talk)04:40, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently added the redirect category shell that you added (some of the redirect categories is used by itself).

If{{R from move}} is used by itself, then:

Just noticed,{{R from [something]}} was used by itself.Reset9290 (talk)15:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then, why is template {{R from move}} is used by itself?

It's because they forgot the {{redirect shell}} template.74.195.77.161 (talk)15:59, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks beingblocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia'spolicy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals yourIP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.consarn_{(grave)(obituary)}16:19, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have beenblocked from editing for a period of1 week forabusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet ofUser:Reset9290 per the evidence presented atWikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reset9290. Note that multiple accounts areallowed, butnot forillegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may bereverted ordeleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome tomake useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sohom (talk)00:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One day left until our block expires.74.195.77.161 (talk)19:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

74.195.77.161(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What just happened to the account?

Decline reason:

Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Reset9290#c-Sohom_Datta-20251006000600-Sohom_Datta-20251006000400 andhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FReset9290&oldid=prev&diff=1315312046 for why you were blocked from editing from IP addresses. --Sohom (talk)04:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

74.195.77.161 (talk)02:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

74.195.77.161(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block was unnecessary.
Recently evaded a block.
The block was affecting this IP address due to disruptive RFD and block evasion.

Decline reason:

This is incoherent, maybe deliberately so.Yamla (talk)18:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

by the way, this has been edited; the ip reverted a review of the previous unblock request, and seemingly broke some formatting in the processconsarn_{(talck)(contirbuton s)}20:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. See:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Disruptive RfD listings—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫‍(talk)01:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which RFD listing?74.195.77.161 (talk)01:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

your only rfd listing since your block expiring.here's the rfd, if clarification is neededconsarn_{(talck)(contirbuton s)}01:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have beenblocked from editing for a period of6 months forblock evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia'sguide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger_{One ping only}01:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is ashared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit bylogging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by anadministrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see theblocking policy).

74.195.77.161(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block was unnecessary.
Recently evaded a block.
The block was affecting this IP address due to disruptive RFD and block evasion.

Decline reason:

This is completely unpersuasive.PhilKnight (talk)04:11, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

74.195.77.161 (talk)02:33, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirects from moves