Hello, I'mNonsensicalSystem. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person onJonas Mekas, but you didn't support your changes with acitation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerninghow we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you!NonsensicalSystem^(error?)_(.log)09:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place{{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.It doesnot imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules calleddiscretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may imposesanctions on editors who do not strictly followWikipedia's policies, or thepage-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place{{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see theguidance on discretionary sanctions and theArbitration Committee's decisionhere. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Mhawk10 (talk)21:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I noticed that the IP address 66.65.110.16 has been continually changing some of the edits I've done in theJonas Mekas page. I wanted to provide this space to discuss this a little bit more -- in my opinion, this is a debate that is in no way settled and whose significance is still debated in the art and film world. Wikipedia should allow for both of the sides of the controversy to be shown without disavowing Casper's findings, which were substantially researched and accepted by academics and film critics alike. What the IP address 66.65.110.16 has been doing disavows academic research, almost as if it wanted to construct a new story, without engaging in a fair debate.

I'm very open to discussing this! Just wanted to clarify my edits and create a platform for debate.

-K— Precedingunsigned comment added byLolkafka1888 (talk •contribs)02:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'mPulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toJonas Mekas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theTeahouse. Thanks.Pulpfiction621 (talk)20:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize Wikipedia, as you did atJonas Mekas, you may beblocked from editing.SouthernNights (talk)20:27, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread isReporting 66.65.110.16. Thank you.Nythar^T.C01:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 66.65.110.16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know thatDraft:Robert A. Haller, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six monthsmay be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, pleaseedit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you canrequest it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.FireflyBot (talk)09:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 66.65.110.16. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Robert A. Haller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you canrequest its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.Liz^Read!Talk!09:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]