User talk:62.168.13.98
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia?Create an account! Your host, To have your ownuser pages, keep track of articles you've edited in awatchlist, and have access toa few other special features, please considerregistering an account! It's fast and free. If you areautoblocked repeatedly, contact yourInternet service provider or network administrator and request it contactWikimedia'sXFF project about enablingX-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on itsproxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider asoft block usingTemplate:Anonblock.
 Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, cansubscribe to aweb feed of this page in eitherRSS orAtom format. |
Welcome!
Hello, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you foryour contributions, such as the one you made toIntegral. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
You are welcome to continue editing withoutlogging in, but many editors recommend that youcreate an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please seethis page. If you edit without a username, yourIP address (62.168.13.98) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Questions, ask me onmy talk page, or ask your question and then place{{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!Ozob (talk)22:22, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of theexternal links you added to the pageCounty of Kladsko withthis edit do not comply with ourguidelines for external links and have been removed.Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform foradvertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia usesnofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on thearticle's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Joydeep (talk)18:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did toGeology.Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Materialscientist (talk)05:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure tosign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or
) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk)10:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atBilingual sign shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.Yopie (talk)18:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:62.168.13.98 reported by User:Yopie (Result: ). Thank you.Yopie (talk)18:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection. Mark Arsten (talk)20:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atCzech Republic shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.RA0808talkcontribs18:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atCzechia - the name dispute shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war.Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. SeeBRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.RA0808talkcontribs19:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:62.168.13.98 reported by User:Yopie (Result: ). Thank you.Yopie (talk)00:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. When you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure tosign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk)09:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try todiscuss controversial changes and seekconsensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seekdispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to requestpage protection.
Materialscientist (talk)12:22, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please do notattack other editors. Comment oncontent, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Pleasestay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.RA0808talkcontribs15:06, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mKatieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one ofyour recent contributions, such as the one you made withthis edit toList of places named after Joseph Stalin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk)18:06, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mKatieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one ofyour recent contributions, such as the one you made withthis edit toNaftogaz, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk)17:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware,Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.Yopie (talk)16:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did withthis edit toPostage stamps and postal history of Germany. A m i t 웃 16:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removingspeedy deletion notices, as you did withCzechia. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing.Yopie (talk)10:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. When you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure tosign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk)17:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is youronly warning; if you makepersonal attacks on other people again, you may beblocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.Yopie (talk)11:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first.Ježíš je Pán. Jesus is the Son of God!
You may beblocked from editing without further warning the next time you makepersonal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.Yopie (talk)17:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Yopie (talk)18:09, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read theguide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk)20:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] Hello, I'mMojo Hand. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem verycivil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you. --Mojo Hand(talk)13:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history atCzechs shows that you are currently engaged in anedit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article'stalk page to work toward making a version that representsconsensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. SeeBRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevantnoticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporarypage protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your beingblocked from editing—especially if you violate thethree-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than threereverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Mojo Hand(talk)13:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pleasestop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may beblocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --Mojo Hand(talk)15:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Mojo Hand(talk)18:45, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mDVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more ofyour recent contributions toCosmology because they appeared to be promotional.Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.DVdm (talk)14:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did toGeography. Whileobjective prose about beliefs, products or servicesis acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to bea vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.DVdm (talk)14:53, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note the only edits you are making here, are additions of references to one particular, but never cited book:[1]. Please stop this. Wikipedia is not an advertising agency for your work. SeeWP:NOTADVERTISING. Thank you. -DVdm (talk)15:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue toadd soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did atSocial geography, you may beblocked from editing.DVdm (talk)15:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue topush a personal agenda, as you did atResttschechei, you may beblocked from editing.Doremo (talk)14:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in anedit war according to the reverts you have made onČesko hledá SuperStar. Users are expected tocollaborate with others, to avoid editingdisruptively, and totry to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware thatWikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article'stalk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that representsconsensus among editors. You can post a request for help at anappropriate noticeboard or seekdispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporarypage protection. If you engage in an edit war, youmay beblocked from editing.SoWhy13:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It doesnot imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
TheArbitration Committee has authoriseddiscretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision ishere.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This meansuninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevantpolicies. Administrators may impose sanctions such asediting restrictions,bans, orblocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
EdJohnston (talk)17:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello andwelcome to Wikipedia. When you add content totalk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure tosign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
or) located above the edit window.This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk)18:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop yourdisruptive editing. If you continue tovandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may beblocked from editing.Yopie (talk)23:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
