This user may have left Wikipedia. 3finger has not edited Wikipediasince December 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, 3finger, andwelcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being aWikipedian! Pleasesign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check outWikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place{{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -OAS^{talk to me}00:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your temp article toDorothy Lucey, just so you know. Thanks for writing a replacement for the copyvio article. You might want to add a category to the article though. --W.marsh17:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to mark your edits asminor only when they genuinely are (seeWikipedia:Minor edit). "The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'." --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης)09:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In your new articles, please spell the "links" in the header "External links" with a lowercase 'l'. It's standard on Wikipedia. Thank you. --MZMcBride03:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you created theAJ Alexander article, I'm hoping that you can fill me in on something. Did you get the text of the article fromElite Bunnies or are they taking content from Wikipedia without giving credit?Dismas|^(talk)15:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's what I thought.Dismas|^(talk)22:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Evenson‎

Sorry.JerryVanF (talk)05:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone keeps vandalizing/removing the playmate stats in the article on Playboy playmateStephanie Adams. Take a look if you have time.208.120.11.116 (talk)13:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The articleVeronica Gamba has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourcedbiography of a living person: neither Playboy nor IMDB are suitable sources on which to base such an article. All but one of the articles on "Playboy Playmates of 1983" have the same problem and have also been proposed for deletion. Kayfabe backstories from Playboy are not reliable sources for such articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Angus McLellan(Talk)14:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJackie Rainbow has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDiane Hunter has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourcedbiography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articlePat Lawler has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourcedbiography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAnne Fleming (model) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourcedbiography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleBarbara Cameron has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourcedbiography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLynn Turner (model) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourcedbiography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleRusty Fisher has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMarion Scott (model) has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for Pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGloria Walker has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAlice Denham has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleElsa Sørensen has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleGloria Windsor has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCarrie Radison has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJean Jani has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleDolores Donlon has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJacquelyn Prescott has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:47, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleMarlene Callahan has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleLinda Vargas has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleCheryl Kubert has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleZahra Norbo has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEleanor Bradley has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleAudrey Daston has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The articleNancy Crawford has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being aPlayboy Playmate is not enough to meet the newnotability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{dated prod}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. Thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.NW(Talk)04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedLaura Lyons, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Lyons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)01:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedDaina House, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daina House. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedDeborah Borkman, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Borkman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedAnn Pennington (model), an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Pennington (model). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedPatricia McClain, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia McClain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedDebra Peterson, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Peterson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedHope Olson, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope Olson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedWhitney Kaine, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Kaine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedKaren Hafter, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Hafter. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)20:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedGig Gangel, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gig Gangel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)21:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedLisa Welch, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)21:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedVictoria Cooke, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victoria Cooke. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)21:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedVeronica Gamba, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Gamba. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)00:59, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedPriscilla Taylor, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Taylor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.The Wordsmith^Communicate17:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedNadine Chanz, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadine Chanz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.The Wordsmith^Communicate17:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedJackie Rainbow, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Rainbow. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.NW(Talk)11:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominatedJanet Quist, an article that you created, fordeletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Quist. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.Off2riorob (talk)21:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 3finger! Thank you for your contributions. I am abot notifying you on behalf of thethe unreferenced biographies team that1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Thebiographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensureverifiability, all biographies should be based onreliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current171 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the{{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Sondra Theodore -Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk)05:54, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJanis Schmitt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janis Schmitt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf01:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleHeidi Sorenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Sorenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf01:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSondra Theodore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sondra Theodore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf01:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleNicki Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicki Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf01:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLisa Welch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Welch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf01:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleLynda Wiesmeier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynda Wiesmeier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRhonda Adams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Adams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleVeronica Gamba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Gamba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleRuth Guerri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Guerri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMardi Jacquet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mardi Jacquet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDebra Jensen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Jensen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf02:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMelinda Mays is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melinda Mays until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDenise McConnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denise McConnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJennifer Miriam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Miriam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKathryn Morrison (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Morrison (model) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleSheila Mullen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Mullen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleCarina Persson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carina Persson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleTeri Peterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teri Peterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleVirve Reid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virve Reid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Damiens.rf03:37, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMarilyn Waltz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Waltz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Fasttimes68 (talk)05:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleJonnie Nicely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonnie Nicely until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Fasttimes68 (talk)06:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleMaria Checa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Checa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Spartaz^Humbug!00:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The articleJeane Manson has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable model, singer and actor fails the notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Sahaib3005 (talk)15:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleAnn Pennington (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Pennington (model) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Golikom (talk)05:17, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEllen Michaels has beenproposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. UnderWikipedia policy, thisbiography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to areliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, seeReferencing for beginners, or ask at thehelp desk. Once you have provided at least onereliable source, you may remove the{{prod blp/dated}} tag.Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you canrequest that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.Nayyn (talk)00:14, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The articleEllen Michaels has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn’t meet BLPROD, per an external source included on the article, but this article doesn’t meet notability or cite any reliable sources with significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards13:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery
• Wikipedians who opt out of template messages