| Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia?Create an account! YourIP address, To have your ownuser pages, keep track of articles you've edited in awatchlist, and have access toa few other special features, please considerregistering an account! It's fast and free. If you areautoblocked repeatedly, contact yourInternet service provider or network administrator and request it contactWikimedia'sXFF project about enablingX-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on itsproxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider asoft block usingTemplate:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you atWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy onedit warring. The thread isWikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:213.205.198.74 reported by User:Clpo13 (Result: ). Thank you.clpo13(talk)15:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

213.205.198.74(block log •active blocks •global blocks •contribs •deleted contribs •filter log •creation log •change block settings •unblock •checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No clear explanation for ban, currently being discussed on admin noticeboard but this seems to have been bypassed, the other user (with a long history of edit warring and arguments) engaged in the edit war has not been blocked. Very confusing.
Decline reason:
You were unambiguously edit warring; whether or not someone else was blocked is not relevant -- you were warned, ignored the warning, and continued.--jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇16:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, pleaseread theguide to appealing blocks first, then use the{{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'mMattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article,Theo Wharton, but you didn't provide areliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like toinclude a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see thereferencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thank you.Mattythewhite (talk)23:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mJim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article,Seven Nation Army, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like toinclude a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message onmy talk page. Thanks.Jim1138 (talk)09:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.--Vsmith (talk)11:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mRekonedth. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toDefinitely Maybe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at theHelp Desk. Thanks.Rekonedth (talk)11:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions, such as the edit you made toDog's Most Wanted, did not appear constructive and has beenreverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with ourpolicies and guidelines. You can find information about these at ourwelcome page which also provides further information aboutcontributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please usethe sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Breaking tags.CommanderOzEvolved (talk) (contribs)06:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please do notattack other editors. Comment oncontent, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Pleasestay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.Nthep (talk)22:41, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mMaterialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more ofyour recent contributions toPick Up Performance Company have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use thesandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at thehelp desk.Materialscientist (talk)11:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]