1timeuse75 may be surprisingly connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may includeconflict of interest andneutral point of view.

This is your only warning; if you continue totemplate me, you may behit witha fish without further notice.

1timeuse75 has been listed as one of the worst articles onWikipedia. If you can improve it further,Please do so.

Long story short i put the wrong name. i put "dead meat" instead of "dead meat youtube channel" on my first draft and i didn't know how to change it. so if @Bonadea can recheck my page for an article that would be great. this was a just a misunderstanding and i was totally my fault.apologies

first time editor, 1timeuse751timeuse75 (talk)12:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - Wikipedia has a lot of weird customs and practices, and it takes a while to learn how it works. Please do not blank the other draft, since it was created by a different editor; the existence ofDraft:Dead Meat won't affect your new draft (which is clearly much better than the old one, at this point). Happy editing! --bonadeacontributionstalk16:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Meat (YouTube Channel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadeacontributionstalk22:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:The thumbnail of Plagiarism and You(Tube).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.Sock(tock talk)18:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies @Sock. Can you give me more details and why this isn't fair use, so I don't make the same mistake again?

Cheers1timeuse75 (talk)19:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No apology needed, we've all been there!WP:FAIRUSE (and specificallyWP:NFCI) covers it in detail, but that page is pretty beefy so I'll summarize my reasoning for this case. The big thing with fair use images is that they have to be either irreplaceable or provide extra insight that can't be described in text.

For example, if you upload an image that's the only usable visual identifier of something, like a movie poster or album cover, that's covered. If you upload something like a screenshot from a movie or game, you need to also include context for why that image is a necessity and can't be described in text.

The image you added would 100% be fair use if the article was specifically about Plagiarism and You(Tube), but since it's just about Hbomberguy and hasn't been critically dissected, its inclusion doesn't really do anything for the reader other than be a nice visual.

Tried to keep the babbling to a minimum, but I hope that makes sense! Feel free to fire off any questions as well and I'll help/clarify as best I can.Sock(tock talk)19:55, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey man, thanks for been so nice, i forget that "Wikipedians" are very nice. i have just have one more question

1a) in the third paragraph you basically say that you can't have media (thumbnail/poster) about anything relating to the article like Hbomberguy can't have Plagiarism and You(Tube) because the article isn't about Plagiarism and You(Tube) . off the top of my head i can think of two examples of this, that i want clarified.Once in a Lifetime (Talking Heads song) have a section about themusic video with a photo. the image is showing that "In the music video,David Byrne dances erratically over footage of religious rituals, dressed in a suit, bowtie and glasses." and not just the thumbnail so i was wondering if maybe a still from Plagiarism and You(Tube) can be add? (like the part where Brewis show James scrip with all plagiarized stuff coloured)

1b)Ghostwatch which is in short is a British mockumentary horror film. near the end of the article there's a part about the making of ghostwatch,Ghostwatch: Behind the Curtains. but the article is about the original film? the only real difference is really the infobox which i don't think matters (maybe it dose i don't know).

anyway thanks thanks for helping, Cheers1timeuse75 (talk)06:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sock cheak my last message. i forgot to @ you1timeuse75 (talk)14:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think an image of him showing the plagiarized script would work wonderfully! That keeps in spirit with the visual on the Once in a Lifetime article, where the image is striking and described in the text. The visual Brewis created with the highlighted text accents the focus of the video and gives readers a great visual of the extent of Somerton's "alleged" plagiarism, which I'd absolutely say falls under fair use.

Regarding theGhostwatch: Behind the Curtains poster, I personally have mixed feelings about both the inclusion of the image and the subsection not being its own article. Historically, we don't include things like deluxe edition cover art for albums since it's not an essential distinction to note, but there are instances where the artwork itself is discussed enough that its inclusion can be warranted. I'll say that falls a bit outside the scope of our conversation, but I'm glad you're observing and questioning all this! Fair use is a muddy thing and I'm not a definitive source on it, so please don't take my word as definitive!Sock(tock talk)14:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks1timeuse75 (talk)14:26, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleDeath of Natalie McNally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.

The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Natalie McNally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Badbluebus (talk)03:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Miraclepine hello a have a question about the DYK nomination that i did. What dose "expanded fivefold" mean?

Cheers1timeuse75 (talk)16:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:5X says that a page may be nominated if the prose is expanded five times its original size.Prosesize calculates that; see the installation instructions if you wanna use that.ミラP@Miraclepine17:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks1timeuse75 (talk)17:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blockbuster (party game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk)11:28, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Lijil, after you declined myDraft i've made some updates to it. But i want to ask, what are the "missing end reference tag" that you mention in your comment?

Cheers

1timeuse75 (talk)12:48, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There was a warning showing on the page that somewhere in the draft there was an opening<ref> tag without a corresponding closing</ref> (or without a self-closing tag like<ref ... />). I can't see it now so I guess you fixed it already!Lijil (talk)17:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Feel Fantastic, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards22:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Sssniperwolf Instagram story.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)02:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was the original editor who uploadedthis picture of her to the article and eventually placed it inWikipedia:Unusual biographical images. As a longtime fan of the channel, I appreciate any improvement towards her article.TansoShoshen (talk)18:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TansoShoshen No problem. also sorry for being a bitharsh in theedit summary.1timeuse75 (talk)19:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, honestly that was just the best I could do given the less than idealsource material. There just was no way to get anything good from this, since for some reason, Ro didn't get a close up or even a segment where she looked at the camera.TansoShoshen (talk)19:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subjectqualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not showsignificant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject inpublished,reliable,secondary sources that areindependent of the subject (see theguidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (seetechnical help and learn aboutmistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:Gopi Gpr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk)17:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RIP1timeuse75 (talk)17:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,1timeuse75!Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have anyother questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at theTeahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!Drmies (talk)17:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beat the Chasers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

sksatsuma10:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of adaptations of Slender Man, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard^🗨14:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Notcharizard How did you accept my draft so fast, after i made it?1timeuse75 (talk)14:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just coincidence, I guess? The name stood out to me on the list of drafts.-- NotCharizard^🗨14:08, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways, thanks for accepting my draft1timeuse75 (talk)14:09, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was also well sourced and written, which genereally makes it faster and easier to review!-- NotCharizard^🗨14:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article atSCP Foundation#Media inspired by the SCP Foundation. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

FailsWP:GNG as-is.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:SCP-087 (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)19:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 1timeuse75. Thank you for your work onBeat the Chasers. Another editor,Northernhenge, has reviewed it as part ofnew pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. It would benefit from adding some critical reviews to show how it fits into the bigger picture.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with{{Re|Northernhenge}}.(Message delivered via thePage Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Northernhenge (talk)20:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed atDraft:Cube Creator 3D. Thanks!ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk)12:22, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cube Creator 3D, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please considerleaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RangersRus (talk)14:36, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 1timeuse75!

I've spotted that the author/copyright owner name field of non-free use rationale is incorrect as it's a screenshot of a video game. In that case you need to use name of the developer and publisher of the game, not the ones who took screenshot, since the developer(s) and/or publisher are the copyright owners of the game.

I've fixed for you. I hope you remember that for the next time you upload screenshot of non-free media, like video games, movies, computer software, etc.Stylez995 (talk)13:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!1timeuse75 (talk)14:35, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify real quick, when I undid your revision incorporatingTemplate:Multiple image for the Roblox Studio screenshot and the logo, I thought that you were adding the Roblox Studio logo. I forgot that it was previously in the page. Your addition of the template, at the very least, did make the page seem cleaner in retrospect should the logo had to have been included. I still don't think the logo substantially contributes to a readers understanding of what the software is, but I'm just clearing things up.λNegativeMP116:15, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying!1timeuse75 (talk)16:18, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploadingFile:Doctor Who, The Adventure Games Gameplay (hiding from Daleks).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required byWikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available fromWikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as animage copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance withsection F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at themedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to thepage's history for further information.DatBot (talk)01:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to clarify the reason behindmy revert on said article. I believe you were right when you said that a citation can be used once, and in the lead only. The^{[not in body]} tags there were referring to the claims that the citations were verifying, not the citations themselves. Thanks,1isall (talk/contribs)20:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleI Made a Game with Zombies in It! isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofTrademarkedTWOrantula --TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk)06:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to addunsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did atLibs of TikTok, you may beblocked from editing.ie her birthdateDoug Wellertalk11:24, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller but that's what the infobox says though?1timeuse75 (talk)11:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does indeed, or rather diid [sic]. Also unsorced so I removed it. Note that you added it to a sourced sentence which made it look as though it was in the source.Doug Wellertalk11:30, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox states that the last paragraph is mainly about Deltarune. This is false. Please don't lie in infoboxes. As a result I have removed it.GraisonParkhurst (talk)13:08, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GraisonParkhurst Yes, the last paragraph of thelead is just about Deltarune. this does not adequately summarise the body of the article, so the lead needs to be rewritten.1timeuse75 (talk)13:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related toarticles aboutliving or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated ascontentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics anddoesnot imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to ascontentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by theArbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipediaadministrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should editcarefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to thepurposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicablepolicies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain fromgaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topicsprocedures, you may ask them at thearbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topichere. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the{{Ctopics/aware}} template.Doug Wellertalk14:08, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission toArticles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

I really do not see this meetingWP:LIST unless you can show sources that talk about the list as a whole. in addition, the parameters are confusing ("have" or "have had?" - currently or anytime in the past?). There could be no end to this list. I would not be willing to move it to mainspace and I am sure others are not either (hence why it has been pending for so long at AfC).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmitafter they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go toDraft:List of people with shaved heads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned andmay be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced anyuntoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at theArticles for creation help desk, on thereviewer's talk page or useWikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk)01:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleI Made a Game with Zombies in It! has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofTrademarkedTWOrantula --TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk)09:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fletcher Mathers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Suitskvarts (talk)13:42, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently editedNorthbury Grove, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pagesFirst-person andLow-fi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk)19:54, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Saunders ATM glitch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pencilceaser123 (talk)02:12, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the screenshot, but did any credible sources report on grokipedia.fun being the actual website domain? It looks more like the work of one of severaldomain squatters that reacted to the announcement, given that Musk had announced a new website without giving a URL or any official web presence for it.Belbury (talk)10:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i mean, it was the first result for "grokipedia" so i thought it the official one1timeuse75 (talk)10:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you searchgrokipedia website there's a bunch of fake sites, the one you found just happened to get to the top. I think Grokipedia just doesn't have a website.

I've started a thread atTalk:Grok (chatbot)#grokipedia.fun.Belbury (talk)12:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the articleMarble Hornets that you recently nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free tocontact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. chickenpox4dinner (talk)19:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

chickenpox4dinner (talk)19:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleMarble Hornets isunder review. Seethe review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChickenpox4dinner --Chickenpox4dinner (talk)03:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleI Maed A Gam3 W1th Z0mb1es 1n It!!!1 has been placedon hold, as the article needs some changes. Seethe review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofTrademarkedTWOrantula --TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk)12:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yourgood article nomination of the articleMarble Hornets haspassed; congratulations! Seethe review page for more information. If the article iseligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you cannominate it within the next seven days.Message delivered byChristieBot, on behalf ofChickenpox4dinner --Chickenpox4dinner (talk)19:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you added the third episode thumbnail forThe Oldest View article. I was considering adding a title card, but was having trouble deciding which of the two below would be better. Plus, I don't really know what licensing each of the photos have so we can fairly use either of them.

https://kanepixelsbackrooms.fandom.com/wiki/The_Oldest_View?file=The_Oldest_View_Section_1.jpghttps://m.imdb.com/title/tt28196306/mediaviewer/rm85048834/?ref_=tt_ov_iChadalvarez2021 (talk)02:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMO i think using an official image from the series is better then a (i think) fan made title card. Also seeNo Through Road (web series) for an example of the same image format as the TOV article1timeuse75 (talk)11:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploadingFile:Skyblock island.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Username:666, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asStart-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as theydevelop over time. You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

11WB (talk)23:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Guevara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed asC-Class, which is recorded on itstalk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at thegrading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can nowcreate articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work toArticles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at thehelp desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option tocreate articles yourself without posting a request toArticles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk)21:39, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I spotted you editing some things on my watchlist and got curious given our shared interest in both lost media and the macabre (I saw you editChristine Chubbuck andLiveLeak specifically). I sawCatastrophe Crow! on your "Articles I Want to Create" list and wanted to see if you were open to collaborating together on a draft article for it? I have a draft of my own in the works about a horror novel, but I want to work more closely with other users on another project. I'm hoping you're open to it?⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk)15:12, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, am open to it! What is the draft in question?1timeuse75 (talk)15:18, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was originally thinking of doing a draft for Catastrophe Crow itself, but I think starting with A̶r̶t̶h̶u̶r̶ Adam Butcher himself will work. I think it's the best idea to create the article about Butcher and then split whatever we write about Crow 64 after the article is published. I'm open to creating the actual draft page itself later but I'm a bit busy at the moment, so you may if you'd like.

⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk)16:10, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArkadenBoden Okay, i've startedthe draft1timeuse75 (talk)17:47, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I'll get to work on it soon.

⚠︎ ArkadenBoden ⚠︎ (talk)17:49, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission ofMarble Hornets at theDid You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) atyour nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs}17:23, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC