 | This is anessay onnotability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not beenthoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This essay in a nutshell:
|
Significance is in the middle of aspectrum of coverage. That spectrum runs from atrivial mention to the main topic of areliable source.Significant coverage is somewhere in the middle of those two extremes. Significant coverage is not just slightly more than a trivial mention. Thegeneral notability guideline defines significant coverage as discussion of a topic in a reliable source that is direct and in-depth. The guideline also requires that an editor should be able to determine notability from a source without usingoriginal research.
This essay proposes using a spectrum approach to determine whether a set of sources establishes notability. The spectrum approach recognizes that sources from the entire spectrum can be used to write articles, but that not all sources on the spectrum will contribute equally to the notability of a subject. Under this approach, at least some sources must contain significant coverage of a topic to establish that topic's notability.
Thegeneral notability guideline says: "If a topic does not meet these criteria but still has some verifiable facts, it might nonetheless be useful to discuss it within another article."
The guideline can be read to define significant coverage as being on a spectrum of coverage: it is "more than a trivial mention, but it doesnot need to be the main topic of the source material."[a] Atrivial mention is usually short, and discusses a topic indirectly or in passing. When something is the main topic of a source, most of the source is about that topic, and it will usually be addressed directly and with a lot of detail.
The guideline gives two examples that illustrate the spectrum of coverage:
In the first example, IBMis the "main topic of the source material". In the second, the mention of Three Blind Mice is trivial because it is said in passing.
The spectrum of coverage is useful as arule of thumb for deciding if acomplete article withappropriate context can be written without relying onoriginal research.
Significance is in the middle of the spectrum of coverage. The general notability guideline defines "significant coverage" as discussion of a topic inreliable sources that "addresses the topicdirectly and in detail, so thatno original research is needed toextract the content".[a][c]
Afootnote to the general notability guideline states that "directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, and minor news stories are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined", even if those sources are reliable. Thesignificance guideline for organizational and corporate notability further clarifies the meaning of "directly and in detail":
The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than avery brief, incomplete stub about the organization.
Under the general notability guideline, significant coverage is not just slightly more than a trivial mention (but it is not "well beyond" that end of the spectrum, as required by the notability guideline for corporations). Coverage that is direct and in detail must cover an aspect of a topic through a description, discussion, or analysis that has enough depth to allow editors to write an article from a neutral point of view with enoughcontext for a reader to understand the topic.
Significance cannot be based on acount of words in a source addressing a topic. On one end of the spectrum, even several paragraphs about a source might be trivialin context. For example, agossip column about a celebrity may contain unimportant information or arun-of-the-mill news story might discuss aroutine local event, such as a high school band concert. On the other end of the spectrum, one sentence in a peer-reviewed scientific journal may be significant enough to establish that an idea or theory is notable.
Coverage in a source is not significant iforiginal research is required to interpret the source. A source does not contribute to providing significant coverage if an editor would be required to overcome "a heap of 'what if?'s" to determine if the source covers a topic.
On the spectrum of coverage, asecondary reliable source that addresses something as a main topic will usually requireno original research to help an editor write about that topic. A secondary source that contains only a trivial mention of a topic can help an editor to write about that topic (perhaps by providing a goodcitation), but does not show that that topic is notable under the guideline. The no original research requirement preventsstringing together a series of trivial mentions to establish notability.
The general notability guideline requires that atopic receive significant coverage in reliable sources. It does not require that each source have significant coverage for that source to count towards establishing notability.[d] For example, a short entry in a country's standard nationalbiographical dictionary would usually count towards establishing thenotability of a person. Even facts can sometimes help to show that a person might be notable, such as the fact that asports figure won a competition at the highest level.
The spectrum approach to determining notability is a framework for determining whether all sources, taken together, provide enough coverage to establish notability. This approach recognizes that sources from the entire spectrum can be used to write articles, but that not all sources on the spectrum will contribute equally to the notability of a subject. Generally, sources that contain only trivial mentions of a topic are not likely to establish notability because an article cannot be written ontrifles. At the other end of the spectrum, one book that covers a topic in depth may not establish notability on its own becauseWikipedia is a tertiary source that collects the views of secondary sources and an article cannot be based on justone point of view. In the middle, two short academic journal articles about a topic and two trivial mentions in newspapers might show that a topic is notable.