User talk:Spartaz
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Archives |
Archive 1 *Archive 2 *Archive 3 *Archive 4 *Archive 5 *Archive 6 *Archive 7 *Archive 8 *Archive 9 *Archive 10 *Archive 11 *Archive 12 *Archive 13 *Archive 14 *Archive 15 *Archive 16 *Archive 17 * Archive 18 * Archive 19 * Archive 20 * Archive 21 * Archive 22 * Archive 23 * Archive 24 * Archive 25 * Archive 26 * Archive 27 |
Spartaz (talk ·contribs ·blocks ·protections ·deletions ·page moves ·rights ·RfA)
I'm a long term user (first edit 2006) and have been an admin on or off since 2007. When we first started there was so much idealism and we really had no strong policies about inclusion except a desire to have some level of sourcing. As time moved on we became more structured and around the time I became an admin in 2007 we were grappling with the concept of collapsing non notable articles into lists which I was at the forefront of as a regular afd closer and constant presence at DRV. I had a lot of patience once and for that reason was regular DRV closer for a long time after GR Berry left the project. Sadly, my patience was degraded over time and getting involved in the PORNBIO wars pretty much washed out a lot of the good faith that policy and courtesy quite rightly requires us to show. This was again a major change in our approach to content and one of the first SNGs that was deprecated in favour of a more rigid approach to proper sourcing. Since then our content in this area has become much better and we are seeing similar struggles now in the sports arena where SNGs are slowly giving way to GNG level standards.
I have always taken a very legalistic approach to closing discussions that I recognise does not fit well to the current community standard, where low participation level allowing more brigading of votes or allowing more non-policy based arguments. For this reason I'm not really closing discussions but will still happily review old closes. Otherwise I mostly review and nominate unsuitable content as aBLP is a serious matter and needs to be properly sourced.
i am willing to userfy deleted articles for improvement as long as there is a reasonable likelihood that they can be saved. If you are challenging a deletion, do you havethree good sources?
Useful Links:
Declaration: I recently logged into my daughter's account to upload and post some images to her sandbox for her university course. For privacy reasons I will not be publicly disclosing her account but will do so privately to any admin in good standing. This was a one time thing and there is no intention for me to edit further using her account. By the way uploading images on mobile is needlessly difficult event for a user who has been around since 2006....SpartazHumbug!15:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Heyy! Can you please restoreMasha Danilova page in my personal space, so I could continue improving it until it's ready to be published again? Thanks! --Oleh325 (talk)16:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good Afternoon, Can you please userfy the deleted article for me?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jorge_Gracie_(2nd_nomination)
BlackAmerican (talk)20:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As requested: an editor has asked fora deletion review ofAlex Zhavoronkov. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.BD2412T22:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gruffalo's Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BD2412T15:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect2014 Chula Vista mayoral election has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § 2014 Chula Vista mayoral election until a consensus is reached.Isla🏳️⚧01:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect2018 Chula Vista mayoral election has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § 2018 Chula Vista mayoral election until a consensus is reached.Isla🏳️⚧01:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! For full disclosure upfront, I'm a PAR employee. I submitted a brief write up requesting for a review of PAR Technology's page deletion from a few years ago. I have detailed reasoning based on new information here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_June_13
Can you please have a look and let me know if this is something we can discuss? Many thanks!LeLiPAR (talk)13:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked fora deletion review ofPAGE NAME. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.LeLiPAR (talk)13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in thisanonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on itsMeta page and view itsprivacy statement.
Take the surveyhere.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk)00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was told to come to the deleteing admin i would like to express my concern that the nominater of said page is extremely biased againt pages like this these pages have been considered notable for years and there were onlyn2 particpents in the afd including the nominator who i feel is biasedWwew345t (talk)21:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed onRamakrishna Mission Boys' Home High School, Rahara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I have contested the deletion because this is a well-known school, far more notable than other articles on schools like Taki Ramakrishna Mission High School, Ramakrishna Mission Siksha Mandir, Sarisha. It has won the Best School Award from the Government of West Bengal in 2019, 2021 and 2024 respectively. If this page is nominated for deletion, then the same should be done with the above pages as well. Therefore, I strongly believe that the page should bekept as a stub and modified gradually.Indian English Literature (talk)09:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kahvihenki has asked fora deletion review ofThinkMarkets. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic17:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Spartaz,
I am Sabrina, working in the press office for the artist Cesare Catania (declaring Conflict of Interest).
I understand that the article was deleted after an AfD discussion. However, since then, significant new independent coverage has become available. Here are some examples:
Given these new sources and his confirmed participation in the Venice Biennale Arte 2024 and Florence Biennale 2025, I kindly ask if it would be possible to restore the article into Draft space (User sandbox). This would allow us to completely rewrite the article in a neutral encyclopedic style, strictly supported by reliable independent references.
Thank you very much for your time and consideration. --Pressart1979 (talk)09:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm sorry to inform you thatMichaelQSchmidt, a prolific Wikipedian, has passed away. You appeared in histen most-edited talk pages (other than his own), so I thought I'd let you know. Condolences can go tohis talk page, where there's a link with more details.Graham87 (talk)17:47, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Spartaz. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.
Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have atemporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with thetemporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.
How do temporary accounts work?
~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).Temporary account IP viewer user right
Impact for administrators
Rules about IP information disclosure
~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward3RR, but notHey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
Useful tools for patrollers
Enable theuser info cardVideos
Further information and discussion
Most of this message was written byMz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk)02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
I'm a member of this year'sElectCom for the ArbCom elections. FYI, I've reverted your questionhere because the questions phase is not open yet; it opens at 00:00, 12 November 2025 (UTC). Thanks,Giraffer (talk)16:15, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I hope you are doing well. You stated atthe ANI discussion andtheir talk page that you intended to block them for a week, but instead you only seemed to block them for 72 hours (3 days). Not sure if that was a mistake, but I thought that I would alert you to that possible error. Thanks, –PharyngealImplosive7(talk)18:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add{{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]