User talk:Nelson Ricardo 2500
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Nelson Ricardo 2500 has not edited Wikipediasince 14 July 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Please remove the above template if you return to editing.Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
The media file you uploaded asFile:LocalNUTS3Oeste.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source),or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the mediaclearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
{{subst:usernameexpand|Nelson Ricardo 2500}} will produce an appropriate expansion,The media file you uploaded asFile:LocalDistritoLeiria.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source),or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the mediaclearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
{{subst:usernameexpand|Nelson Ricardo 2500}} will produce an appropriate expansion,Hello. I was onWikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Portuguese to English translators and wondered if you could translatePrince Peter of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary? Thank you or obrigado.The Emperor's New Spy (talk)13:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The articleProClarity has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Smerdis of Tlön -killing the human spirit since 2003!16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Nricardo; I'm dropping you this note because you've usedthe article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks,Okeyes (WMF) (talk)22:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed fordeletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please seeHelp:Image page. Thank you.Theo's Little Bot (error?)08:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine thecopyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying theexact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by followingthis link. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you.Sfan00 IMG (talk)19:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can only assume this[1] is either you trolling, or just being manifestly dumb. Stop doing that.Shadowjams (talk)06:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the articleKwame Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according toWikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should bedeleted.
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwame Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.ApprenticeFanwork09:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Musicals with Nazi characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments atthe category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅contribs)17:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mBracketBot. I have automatically detected thatyour edit toCaldas da Rainha may have broken thesyntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: justedit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message onmy operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show⇨) |
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, followthese opt-out instructions. Thanks,BracketBot (talk)06:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your upload ofFile:Caldas da Rainha Pottery.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructionshere. Thanks!Message delivered byTheo's Little Bot (opt-out)14:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you editedCaldas da Rainha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation pageValença (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing todisambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.Read theFAQ • Join us at theDPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow theseopt-out instructions. Thanks,DPL bot (talk)08:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If not in theLeiria District, what District isOeste Subregion in? Please add this to the article. Thanks!WilliamKF (talk)17:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Teria como terminar de traduziressa página? Grato.189.101.40.134 (talk)11:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'mReferenceBot. I haveautomatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is afalse positive, you canreport it to my operator.Thanks,ReferenceBot (talk)00:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article is a stylistic mess and I merely tried to tidy it up somewhat. But I can't see what you objected tohere. The only thing remotely fitting that description is my replacement of "|author=Assembleia da República ([[Assembly of the Republic (Portugal)]])" with "|author=Assembleia da República ([[Assembly of the Republic (Portugal)|Assembly of the Republic]])". I don't see that as being in any way wrong, and it's quite customary to pipe such links. Admittedly it could be piped differently. Regards, -- Ohc ¡digame!02:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, in case you have the time, I'm making a general request hoping that someone can tidy my machine code translation of the Population Matters' article mentioned. (Ultimately I hope to move the article to "População é importante" or whatever might be the best translation of "Population (as a subject) is important"). The article is currently up for deletion so I'm contacting a few potential translators. Please check:W:pt:Population_Matters&action=history to avoid wasting time. If the article is deleted I would still appreciate its development atw:pt:Usuário(a):Gregkaye/Testes. Any help with any population related article would also be appreciated. Many thanksGregkaye (talk)06:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)w:en:User_talk:Gregkaye[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the articleCaldas da Rainha you nominated forGA-status according to thecriteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofBilorv --Bilorv (talk)16:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't merely say these rules don't support removing pipes, because then your actions can be counted as nothing but disruptive editing (seeWikipedia:Disruptive editing).--ɱ(talk)05:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The articleCaldas da Rainha you nominated as agood article has passed
; seeTalk:Caldas da Rainha for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you cannominate it to appear in Did you know.Message delivered byLegobot, on behalf ofBilorv --Bilorv (talk)07:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 | Hello, Nelson Ricardo 2500. This is a courtesy notice that thecopy edit you requested forCaldas da Rainha at theGuild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. Allfeedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best,Miniapolis21:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the currentArbitration Committee election. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipediaarbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome toreview the candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page. For the Election committee,MediaWiki message delivery (talk)08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible you translatethis article? Gratefull.2804:14C:5BB6:802D:E269:95FF:FE51:FF80 (talk)16:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Did you (if you have time) could translate thishere for me? Thanks in advance.201.17.137.122 (talk)14:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I would like to request the creation of a Portuguese wiki page based on an english articlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabio_Mancini
Is it possible to help me with that?Irene000 (talk)11:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.Mdann52 (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please reviewthe candidates' statements and submit your choices onthe voting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Longjohnson20 (talk)01:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Nricardo, thanks for creatingNick Hendrix!
I've just tagged the page, using ourpage curation tools, as having some issues to fix.WP:BLP: please add more sources. Tabloids are not consideredWP:RS.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment onmy talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers atthe Teahouse.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)05:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk)18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created,Local administrative unit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations fromreliable,independent sources.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is ofcentral importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft todraftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia'sgeneral notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.InterstellarityT 🌟13:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi there, I'mHasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know thatDraft:Local administrative unit, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may requestUserfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available atWP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention.HasteurBot (talk)01:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Nricardo. It has been over six months since you last edited theArticles for Creation submission orDraft page you started, "Local administrative unit".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopediamainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simplyedit the submission and remove the{{db-afc}},{{db-draft}}, or{{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions atthis link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!Bkissin (talk)19:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploadingFile:Logo Caldas da Rainha Camara Municipal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under aclaim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (seeour policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in anyarticles will be deleted after seven days, as described insection F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk)03:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation and please get in touch onSuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you havefeedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me onSuggestBot's talk page. Thanks fromNettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. --SuggestBot (talk)05:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
-- 06:21, Monday, December 7, 2020 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 06:21, Monday, December 7, 2020 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi, I came across thediscussion thread you started in the Traveller's Pub at Wikivoyage, and I think it's a great initiative! Adding Wikivoyage links to Wikipedia articles definitely is a good way to increase visibility, too, but I have noticed that this is often done inconsistently or improperly. For example, it appears Wikivoyage has the tendency to delete pages of destinations but not remove the links from Wikipedia articles. There is currently no bot that seems to catch this, so there are plenty of dead links to Wikivoyage because the corresponding articles no longer exist. Some examples areGunib,Shipka,Buynaksk etc. All of those seem to have had Wikivoyage articles at some point in time.
Of course all those dead links make a poor impression, at the very least they indicate a lack of synchronisation/collaboration between Wikivoyage and Wikipedia.
The 3 example articles above are "real" places that can be visited, so if there is not sufficient travel content to fill an article with, could they be redirected rather than deleted? All of the examples have Wikivoyage articles in other languages already, so maybe translation could help as a temporary placeholder rather than deleting articles? Generally if an article exists on a Wiki in other languages, it's better to translate than to delete, because this has the tendency of re-creating pages over and over again but losing the article history every time.
If you are active on Wikivoyage, could you please raise this issue in the Traveller's Pub discussion thread?
Keep up the good work and all the best,ArticCynda (talk)20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Hello! Voting in the2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. Alleligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. TheArbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting theWikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to imposesite bans,topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. Thearbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please reviewthe candidates and submit your choices on thevoting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Moss (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DavidEfraim (talk)15:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The articleRiverSource has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:
FailsWP:NCORP. Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. Tagged for notability issues for years.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. ImcdcContact04:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
