Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

User:Jenhawk777

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Hello and welcome

    • (In a nature-documentary style:) "And this is where we will often find the "Jenhawk" Wikipedian, known for monstrously large topics... with the small bird as the favored Swedish collaborator Gråbergs Gråa Sång"
      (In a nature-documentary style:)"And this is where we will often find the "Jenhawk" Wikipedian, known for monstrously large topics... with the small bird as the favored Swedish collaboratorGråbergs Gråa Sång"
    • Capybara: Now that I am the "cattle tyrant", can I just order everyone to agree with me?
      Capybara: Now that I am the "cattle tyrant", can I just order everyone to agree with me?
    • Gråbergs Gråa Sång offers this humble bird to be included on my mock coat of arms (along with my crocodile) and my very real motto "Illegitimi non carborundum" (don't let the bastards grind you down).
      Gråbergs Gråa Sång offers this humble bird to be included on my mock coat of arms (along with my crocodile) and my very real motto "Illegitimi non carborundum" (don't let the bastards grind you down).

    Atheist Tom Bissell writing about the history of the Apostles declares, "I have long believed that anyone who does not find Christianity interesting has only his or her unfamiliarity with the topic to blame."

    "Mainstream" scholarship is defined by critical method and what is verifiable historically. It is not a point-of-view or a philosophy, it is not found in the presence or absence of religious belief. It does not require belief of any kind other than a belief in the method itself.

    "But should we not seek the truth? Yes, of course. Nonetheless, as Maher said, like the volunteer writers of Wikipedia, we also must focus on "the best of what we can know right now." That is a statement of intellectual humility, not of relativism. Complex topics and problems do not lend themselves to easy assessments of truth in real time. Through broad sourcing, the Wikipedia model in theory moves us to closer approximations of what is true."

    • My Essay On Neutrality

    I fully support the very high priority Wikipedia and my fellow editors place on neutrality. It's an amazing thing when you stop and think about it - millions of people setting aside personal beliefs and opinions to uphold a standard that goes against natural tendencies.

    For better — and for worse — we are all influenced by our culture, race, nationality, gender, and ethics. We are all historically situated. The good news is, that does nothave to prevent neutrality and objectivity.

    Take Olympic judges for example. They must overcome their national biases to be decent judges, and part of that is the presence of the other judges from whom they want the same thing. As historian Thomas L. Haskell explains, "even a polemicist, deeply and fixedly committed" can cultivate neutrality insofar as they are willing to enter into even a little empathy and treat others as they wouldlike to be treated. That is the Wikipedia Way.

    This is not naive; it is fully practical and doable.

    • I.Be wary of overconfidence.
    • "The more certain you are about an opinion, the more likely you are to employ confirmation bias... Sometimes the best time to expose yourself to opposing views is when you are most certain you already have all the information you need".[1]
    • "When you find evidence that contradicts your opinion, don’t assume you must either reject the evidence or abandon your opinion. Instead, consider modifyingaspects of your original theory."
    • II.Confront all data
    • Test Yourself by looking for contrary evidence.
    • Leave behind the way we might prefer things to be and deal with the way things are.
    • Pure detachment is not possible, but, as economist Robert Solow says, “Just because a perfectly aseptic environment is impossible doesn’t mean one should conduct surgery in a sewer.”
    • III. Use Wikipedia's just and reasonable Method.
    See also:Wikipedia:Reliable sources § Biased or opinionated sources, andWikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
    • Vet your sources.
    • Learn how to recognize if an author neglects facts, fails to acknowledge opposing arguments, or dismisses contradictory studies. Their bias doesn't excuse yours.
    • IV.Use the same standard for all
    • Seek Consensus; Submit your work to the unsympathetic. Listen. Peer reviews are worth their weight in gold.
    • V.No Personal attacks
    • Don't make them, don't let others get away with them. Contact an admin when needed. This is our online home, and we must all maintain it.
    • However, we must also be willing to listen to criticism and carefully consider it. We don't have to automatically agree - or disagree - but we should at least check it out.
    • Admitting error doesn't actually cost anything. All of us are more than any one mistake.
    1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
    2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
    3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
    4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
    5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
    6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
    • Cheers to all my fellow Wikipedian's!Enjoy being here. This is a wonderful opportunity. A thousand blessings on Jimmy Wales!Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:02, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
      • These steps are taken from the work of Michael Licona, from the Forbes Coaches Council on leadership:15 Steps You Can Take To Fight Unconscious Bias[2]; and fromThe Business Journal'sTips for overcoming and neutralizing your confirmation bias[3].

    "[https://hackernoon.com/wikipedia-rules-everything-around-me Remember, Wikipedia is not a sleek Silicon Valley startup with rows of paid moderators. Wikipedia is held together by a few thousand volunteer editors, a patchwork of semi-reliable bots, and the stubborn conviction of a community that still believes truth is worth defending. ...

    Wikipedia has built a defense system that reacts faster than most newsrooms: vandalism is reversed in minutes, bots flag obvious abuse, and semi-protection walls off the most targeted pages. The human side is equally formidable: a culture that isn’t polished, isn’t always welcoming, but is absolutely relentless.

    That relentlessness - combined with the fact that Wikipedia remains one of the few places online where money can’t simply buy influence - is exactly why it now occupies such a privileged position.]" First posted byGråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:22, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

    And here's a couple of FUNNY You-tube videos for those with a sense of humor:[4] and[5]

    I like meeting people who are not like me - and then getting along with them.
    Unified login:Jenhawk777 is the unique unified login of this user for all publicWikimediaprojects.
    This editor is anAuspicious Looshpah and is entitled to display thisBook of All Knowledge with Secret Appendix.


    GEThis Wikipedian is agentle editor and attempts to abide strictly by both the letter and spirit ofNPA. They invite comments on their talk page whenever they fall short.
    This editor is againstkitten abuse.
    This user advocates for animal rights.
    This user is interested inenvironmentalism.
    This user is interested inhistory.
    This user is interested in ethics.

    Kindness CampaignThis user is a member of theKindness Campaign.
    This user makeswomen blue.
    This user's personal motto isIllegitimi non carborundum (don't let the bastards grind you down)
    This user is interested inarchitecture.
    This user is an American who lived outside of America for most of their childhood.
    This user is a member ofWikiProject Bible.
    This user is a member of
    WikiProject Christianity.
    This user condemns all forms ofantisemitism.
    Undergrad degrees in religion, philosophy, and literature; graduate study in ethics and religion.
    This user wants to be yourfriend.
    Face-smileThis user is a member of theWelcoming Committee of Wikipedia!


    Contributions:

    [edit]

    Ambrose

    Augustine of Hippo (section on Coercion)

    Battle of Frigidus

    Bible

    The Bible and humor My first DYK? article!

    Bible and violence - the very first article I ever worked on here on Wikipedia - needs work now

    Biblical criticism (my first GA article)

    Byzantine Empire (Religion section)

    Christianity and paganism

    [6]Christian ethics

    Christianization

    Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation

    [7]Chronicle of Arbela

    Conversion to Christianity

    GAR ofDevil in Christianity

    My first creation (rather than addition) -Early Christian Women and Pagan Opinion: The Power of the Hysterical Woman

    [8]Ethics in the Bible

    createdEvolutionary theodicy

    Fall of the Western Roman Empire

    Francis Drake

    Historical Jesus

    History of Christianity

    Historiography of the Christianization of the Roman Empire

    [9]History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance

    History of Christianity

    Irenaean theodicy

    Massacre of Thessalonica

    [10]Martyrdom of Pionius

    Persecution of Christians

    Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire

    Persecution of Christians in the post–Cold War era

    [11]Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire

    Problem of evil

    Christianity in civilizationRole of Christianity in civilization

    Religious persecution[12]

    Religious policies of Constantine the Great

    Religious responses to the problem of evil

    Theodosius I

    Tunica molesta

    Women in the Bible


    • As a reviewer:

    Reviewed:Tourbillion Bulgaria; My first GA review of someone else's article succeeded!

    So did my second: Indonesian Christian Student Movement![13]

    ReviewedW. Sterling Cary a really well done article and passed it.Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

    ReviewedJohn 3:16 failed

    ReviewedPapyrus 45 passed

    ReviewedDevil in Christianity passed

    ReviewedChristianity: failed

    ReviewedMichael Miller: failed

    Peer review ofMegan Phelps-Roper that subsequently went GA

    Works in progress:

    [edit]

    Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Biblical criticism/1

    Early Christianity

    History of Christianity

    Christianity as the Roman state religion

    Of interest:

    [edit]

    need to create: New (Neo) evangelicalism

    need to create: Primitive Christianity

    need to create: volitional epistemology and moral ecology

    need to create: Wayne Meeks; Charity in early Christianity; The Confession of St. Patrick;

    need an article on the Christian enlightenment during the early modern period.

    need to create an article on Moore's book. Lots of articles available on it.

    Add toLouis the Pious impact on church becoming less entangled with state

    Add to this one under Legacy:Apostles in the New Testament

    Christianity in the 4th century


    Christianity in late antiquity

    From Gog:

    [14] Ethics in religion

    [15] History of Christianity

    Death penalty

    covenant Covenant

    Nativity Nativity

    Judaizers Judaizers

    Talk:Theodicy Theodicy

    [16] civil religion

    [17] atonement in ChristianityLeviticus 18

    Anti-Christian sentiment

    Paul of Samosata

    Criticism of atheism

    Christian values

    total rewrite has been suggested forInsider movement

    addedToleration

    [18] Christianity and violence, my first bog of quicksand, doesn't look too bad.

    Circumcellions imbalance

    Supersessionism

    Easter

    Donald Guthrie (theologian)

    Covenant (historical) needs citations

    Spread of Christianity

    Compadres

    [edit]

    these are wonderful editors and people! I am so glad to have worked with them

    Norfolkbigfish

    Just Another Cringy Username editor capable of deleting what isn't necessary; helped on History of Christianity

    Aza24 helps with music/arts

    Wham2001 also corrects citations - man I love these guys, and I mean that literally!

    AirshipJungleman29

    Pbritti

    P Aculeius

    Czarking0

    Avilich

    Wehwalt

    ActivelyDisinterested willing to help with correcting citations! YAY!

    Extraordinary Writ

    Mike Christie

    Gog the Mild

    Gerda

    Farang Rak Tham

    Josh

    talk:Gråbergs

    Andrewa

    WikiProject Christianity

    Mortee

    [19]Ermenrich

    [20]Buidhe

    AlanM1

    Nick Moyes

    Gareth Griffith-Jones

    PaleoNeonate

    [[21]]

    Richard Keatinge

    VR

    (orange butt iconButtinsky)

    User talk:RenanIL96

    A. Parrot

    Josh Milburn semi-retired

    WJ94

    Midnightblueowl

    Generalissima did the GA of history of Christianity

    User talk:Werter1995 sources on H. of C.

    User talk:Bishonen

    User talk:Borsoka Middle Ages - lots of drama

    User talk:AirshipJungleman29 Middle Ages

    User talk:Generalissima

    User talk:Seltaeb Eht Middle Ages

    Help:

    [edit]

    use curly brackets around: ill|name|countryTemplate:ILL for non-English wikipedia references

    To collapse a section, use ctop at the beginning, then cbot at the end within double curly brackets. To strike,use s inside lesser than < and greater than > symbols at the beginning, and add a backslash at the end so it reads less than< backslash/ then s and greater than>. like this

    To link to a section or subsection in another page, append a # and the section name to the page name:displayed textFor linking in the same page, omit the page name and use a # and the section name:displayed textPage name § Section name

    Ellipses require the placement of a "non-breaking space" before them: it's written with a & then nbsp and a semicolon

    [22] Avoiding common mistakes: first, know what they are.

    Wikipedia:Writing better articles

    Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style

    Help:Table how to set up a table

    Help:Shortened footnotes

    The great and wonderful Teahouse![23]

    [24] how to check images for copyright

    [25]] how to use multiple images

    [26] passing image review

    [27] alternative text for images

    [28] idea lab

    [29] rudeness

    [30]countering bias

    [31]MOS block quotes

    [32] how to do diffs

    [33] Wikitext

    [34] ANI

    Wikipedia:Dispute resolution

    To include a pdf in a reference:

    • Include URL link to article, pre-print, or abstract.


    {{cite journal |last=Aries |first=Myriam B. C. |last2=Newsham |first2=Guy R. |last-author-amp=yes |date=2008 |title=Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review |url=http://archive.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc49212/nrcc49212.pdf |journal=Energy Policy |volume=36 |issue=6 |pages=1858–1866 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021 |access-date=October 18, 2013}}
    Displays as:
    Aries, Myriam B. C. & Newsham, Guy R. (2008). "Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review" (PDF). Energy Policy. 36 (6): 1858–1866. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021. Retrieved October 18, 2013.

    • Displays as:

    Aries, Myriam B. C. & Newsham, Guy R. (2008). "Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review" (PDF). Energy Policy. 36 (6): 1858–1866. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021. Retrieved October 18, 2013.

      • If the linked document is PDF, but the extension is not .pdf or .PDF, you may add the parameter |format=PDF, which displays " (PDF)" after the link.
    • On a Talk page, when including references, place Talkref between double curly brackets at the end just before signing
    • Redirect: create the new page and add:
      #REDIRECT [[Article name]]
      as the sole text on the old article
    • [35] splitting: remember to add an edit summary when copying content, have thought about which categories and external links you will need to add and what the new lead will look like, then just type the name of the new article somewhere, This is my new article name (like in your sandbox, or in to the search engine), and click on it, and you will see “you may create this page”, click on that, and create the page. Then copy your content in to there making sure the edit summary says, “copied from” the old article name with a live wikilink. You will need to have two different windows open in your browser ... the one you are copying from and the new article you are copying to. Try not to save the new article until you have added a proper lead sentence and categories so the new page patrollers won’t have you :). And don’t forget to add the references section. You can worry about deleting content from the old article after you have the new article working, but again, when you delete the content from the old article, be sure to say in edit summary, “content moved to” with a live link to the new article. Basically, you are just creating a new article and the only thing that is really crucial is that you follow WP:CWW by indicating in edit summary where you got the content. Then, don’t forget to tag the new article talk page with the Wikiproject tags that are on the old article. Heartfelt thanx toSandyGeorgia for interpreting WP instructions!

    use: (two curly brackets) Copied|from= |from_oldid=|to= |to_diff= (two curly brackets)

    Press Shift, Command ⌘ + 5 to take a screenshot

    Tools

    [edit]

    My library The library!! Whoo hoo!

    [36]

    [37] Archive

    [38] open library

    [39] free newspaper library

    [40] Bible translator

    [41] Resource requestWikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request

    List of citation templates:Help:Citation Style 1

    Template for use in articles undergoing major edits: double curly brackets front and back around 'under construction' will tag an article about major work being done; or

    [42]

    [43] under construction

    Wikipedia:Prosesize for # of words

    Wikipedia:Moving_a_page#How_to_move_a_page

    List of Wikipedias

    Template:Cite encyclopedia

    Template:Cite news

    Wikipedia:Personal user awards

    Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

    Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment

    Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace

    [44] referencing

    [45] citation bot

    [46]] copyright tags for images

    [47]] check for copy violations

    [48]] how to nowrap

    for Bible quotes go to wikisource ats:Bible; type in like this: [[s:Bible (King James)/Psalms#Psalm 23|Psalms:23]]

    [49]

    Resource exchange

    Google Books

    Citation Tool for Google Books

    Earwig's copyvio detector

    Undue weight

    Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Archive_199#People_we_quote_and_paraphrase Manual of style archive

    [50] GA criteria

    [51] FA criteria

    Hebrew lexicons

    [52] Welcoming committee

    [[53]] hyphenator for isbn's

    Template:Hatnote templates for finding templates

    [54] Hirtle chart/copyright info for images

    [55] By country copyright for images

    Quoted from the Five pillars: (Don't forget this!)

    [edit]

    "We strive for articles thatdocument andexplainmajor points of view, givingdue weight with respect totheir prominence in animpartial tone. Weavoid advocacy and wecharacterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view,presenting each accurately and in context rather than as"the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive forverifiable accuracy,citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons.Editors' personal experiences,interpretations, or opinions do not belong". (Harvard, Oxford, etc., Vetus Testamentum, and the Journal of Biblical Literature, etc. preferred on Bible articles.)

    Invaluable resources for researchers:

    Name:Wikiquote
    Description: collection ofquotations
    Website:www.wikiquote.org
    Launched: July 10, 2003
    Alexa rank: 3,733(Global, July 2017[update])[1]
    Wikisource logoName:Wikisource
    Description:digital library
    Website:www.wikisource.org
    Launched: November 24, 2003
    Alexa rank: 4,362(Global, July 2017[update])[2]
    Wikimedia Commons logoName:Wikimedia Commons
    Description: repository of images, sounds, videos, and general media
    Website:commons.wikimedia.org
    Launched: September 7, 2004
    Wikispecies logoName:Wikispecies
    Description:taxonomic catalogue ofspecies
    Website:species.wikimedia.org
    Launched: September 14, 2004
    Wikinews logoName:Wikinews
    Description:online newspaper
    Website:www.wikinews.org
    Launched: November 8, 2004
    Alexa rank: 60,341(Global, July 2017[update])[3]
    Wikiversity logoName:Wikiversity
    Description: collection of tutorials and courses, while also serving as a hosting point to coordinate research
    Website:www.wikiversity.org
    Launched: August 15, 2006
    Alexa rank: 14,505(Global, July 2017[update])[4]
    Wikidata logoName:Wikidata
    Description:knowledge base
    Website:www.wikidata.org
    Launched: October 30, 2012

    BookFinder.com


    Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library

    Wikipedia:Twinkle

    Wikipedia:Good article


    • TO WELCOME NEW PEOPLE USE THIS:

    Welcome!

    [edit]

    Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

    Please remember tosign your messages ontalk pages by adding a space and fourtildes to the end of the last line of your post, like this:

    This is the last line of the post. ~~~~

    The tildes will be automatically converted to a signature that contains your linked username and a timestamp to help keep conversations organized. I will sign mine accordingly with hopes you will remember me and will feel free to ask me any questions you have--or just say hi!

    Where to find new users

    [edit]

    Here are some ways to find new users:

    • Checkyour watchlist – welcome the users who are working on the things you yourself are interested in. The new users are the ones with a redtalk page link.
    • CheckWikipedia's account creation log – this is especially useful with a quick link to their talk page, as well as an "at-a-glance" sign to tell if they've probably been welcomed already: their talk page isn'tred linked!
    • Special:ActiveUsers a list of users who had some kind of activity within the last 30 days.
    • New users can frequently be found seeking help at theWikipedia:Teahouse andWikipedia:Help desk.
    • You will no doubt come across new users as you work on Wikipedia. You may spot them in the edit histories of pages or on talk pages. If a user's signature or username is inred, that indicates that he or she doesn't have a user page set up yet. That means they are very likely (but not always) a new user. Check their talk page to see if they've already been greeted (though there's no harm in greeting a new user again; you can always say "hi", and offer your assistance).
    • Check therecent changes. If there is a new user, it will say as an edit summary:(New user account). These users will also be on theaccount creation log. You can then click on thered linked talk page and then greet them. This is also helpful if you are looking for newbies,vandalism, etc.
    • Snuggle displays users who have registered within the past month. The list can be sorted in date order. It provides an overview of messages on their talk page, and quick access to their talk page and list of contributions.
    1. ^"Wikiquote.org Site Info".Alexa Internet. Retrieved2017-07-08.
    2. ^"Wikisource.org Site Info".Alexa Internet. Retrieved2017-07-08.
    3. ^"Wikinews.org Site Info".Alexa Internet. Retrieved2017-07-08.
    4. ^"Wikiversity.org Site Info".Alexa Internet. Retrieved2017-07-08.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jenhawk777&oldid=1322016199"
    Categories:

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp