This user has received remuneration through the Wikimedia Foundation, and Wikimedia Sweden, including but not limited for engagement as aWikipedian in Residence for theSwedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.

This isCFCF'stalk page, where you can send them messages and comments. Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Archives:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34Auto-archiving period:3 minutes

It is approximately11:42 PM where this user lives (Stockholm). [refresh] This user has been on Wikipedia for19 years, 5 months and 14 days. This user is aphysician. This user is ascientist.

The redirectß-carotin has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9 § ß-carotin until a consensus is reached.

The redirectAtlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy has been listed atredirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets theredirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 24 § Atlas of Human Cardiac Anatomy until a consensus is reached.1234qwer1234qwer405:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library:Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025

• New collections:
  • Times of Malta
  • Africa Intelligence
  • Intelligence Online
  • La Lettre
  • Glitz
• Spotlight: Wikimania

Read the full newsletter

(This message was sent toUser:CFCF and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hi there,

I’m interested in contributing to the medical pages on Wikipedia. Do you have any recommendations regarding where to start? I’m happy to help wherever there is the most need currently.DataFocused (talk)02:51, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DataFocused, there are many areas andWP:MED keeps a list of articles of varying quality. I would suggest you consider your area of interest, rather than medicine broadly, or even just something that piques your interest right now, and then seeing whether there is anything Start or C-classed there. I would suggest you readWP:MEDRS andWP:MEDMOS to get an idea of quality of articles. Then I would suggest introducing yourself atWT:MED, where there is a steady stream of discussion on articles needing improvement.CFCF (talk)03:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think I’ll start with some Start and C-classed articles. Will also introduce myself atWT:MEDDataFocused (talk)03:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the conclusions seem pretty solid, but just a note that thechiropractic page is using a lot of 15-20 year old reviews. May be worth you or another regular medical editor taking a look.DataFocused (talk)06:31, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,In 2015 the pageMedical ultrasonography was renamed toMedical ultrasound. However, that page still describes only medical ultrasonography, which is only a part of medical ultrasound. I propose to rename it back, then create a small new pageMedical ultrasound containing a brief review of all medical ultrasound methods and applications with links toMedical ultrasonography and other pages.Any objections?Ufim (talk)07:26, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think as long as there is clarity that ultrasonography is a part of ultrasound that would be fine. You could do this by creating a disambiguation page which is linked at the top of the ultrasonography page. I think the reasoning was that this was theWP:COMMONNAME, but agree it is not entirely correct @Ufim.CFCF (talk)10:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk)07:31, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]