 | This is anessay onWikipedia:Policies and guidelines. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not beenthoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: It is important whenassuming good faith to begin with a position of assuming that an editor knows nothing about the rules and policies of Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia is full of policies and procedures that are to be followed by all editors. This includes everything fromStyle of Writing toacting civilly towards all. Even the best administrators do not 100% knowall of the rules and policies, or at least their proper/current interpretation. When faced with a situation with another editor, you therefore not only need toassume good faith, but you need to take it one step further.Assume ignorance of the rules.
Time and time again, editors have been mentioned at theAdministrator's Noticeboard for Incidents for having violated some policy or guideline who then loudly state, "I didn't know that!" There are many reasons that new editorsmake inappropriate edits to an article. They may not understand Wikipedia, or they may think it's harmless or funny. They might have even been given a standard template warning once or twice, which they may not have understood due to jargon. In other words, they may just beignorant of all the rules.
When dealing with this kind of editor, we must start with the understanding that the editor knows nothing, and until provided the chance to see and understand those rules, they may not change. For this reason,welcome templates are good beginnings. Many of them show the editor the cornerstones of Wikipedia and how to edit. They are a distinct and direct "showing of the rules".
After being made aware of the rules, they have no excuses for defying them.