Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1922 United States Supreme Court case
United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
Submitted March 13, 1922
Decided March 27, 1922
Full case nameUnited Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
Citations258U.S.268 (more)
42 S. Ct. 299; 66L. Ed. 615
Case history
PriorKans.Gen.Stats., 1915, §7323, 7324
264 F.7d 5 (8th Cir.)
Holding
Judgement reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
MajorityHolmes
DissentClarke, joined by Taft, Day

United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt, 258 U.S. 268 (1922), was acase decided by theSupreme Court of the United States that limitedliability for landowners regarding injuries to childtrespassers.

Holding

[edit]

The court held that a landowner was not liable under theattractive nuisance doctrine if the child had not been attracted to the land by the condition that injured him. This case has since been overturned.

External links

[edit]
Intentional Torts
Assault &Battery
Abuse of process
intentional infliction of emotional distress
Trespass to land &Trespass to chattels
Conversion
Privacy, Publicity rights
Tortious interference
Defamation
Negligence
Duty of care
Medical malpractice
Wrongful death,Loss of consortium
Common employment
Public Authority,Fireman's rule,Negligence per se
Causation
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
Nuisance
Public
Private
Strict liability
Ultrahazardous activity
Product liability
Damages
Joint and several liability
Comparative negligence
Punitive damages
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Zinc_%26_Chemical_Co._v._Britt&oldid=1322630521"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp