Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

United States ship naming conventions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Traditional naming patterns used by American naval ships
For the Wikipedia guideline, seeWikipedia:Naming conventions (ships).

United States ship naming conventions for theU.S. Navy were established by congressional action at least as early as 1862. Title 13, section 1531, of theU.S. Code, enacted in that year, reads, in part,

The vessels of the Navy shall be named by the Secretary of the Navy under direction of the President according to the following rule:Sailing-vessels of the first class shall be named after the States of the Union, those of the second class after the rivers, those of the third class after the principal cities and towns and those of the fourth class as the President may direct.

Further clarification was made byexecutive order ofPresidentTheodore Roosevelt in 1907.[1] However, elements had existed since before his time. If a ship is reclassified, for example a destroyer is converted to a mine layer, it retains its original name.

Traditional conventions

[edit]

Contemporary ship naming conventions and their exceptions

[edit]
As of March 2023, in a report to congress, the Navy has announced that while the class would continue to be known as theColumbia-class, there was as of yet no particular naming scheme set for the class.[3] But with only two state names available, a change to a different scheme is likely, see theVirginia-class submarine entry for more information.

After the 30th boat and with only two available state names remaining, the Navy began using legacy names of previous attack submarines.[4] Navy SecretaryKenneth Braithwaite stated that he; "...supports naming future submarines after past vessels with historic naval legacies."[5] The next four boats of the class (SSN-804 to SSN-807) have so far followed this naming scheme, (with all four also being names of fish, another previous naming convention of submarines). A report to Congress on 4 February 2021, advised the Navy had not indicated these exceptions as being a change to the policy for naming ships.[4]

On 8 March 2023, in a report to congress, the Navy stated that while they do not have a set naming scheme for the remainder of theVirginia-class boats (after SSN-808), they were examining the possibility of continuing with state names. Since state namedOhio-class boats are scheduled to be decommissioned on a regular basis beginning in 2026, and the next planned, unnamedVirginia-class boats will not be entering service until 2028, the Navy will see if that gap can be exploited to take state names as they become available from decommissionedOhio boats and almost immediately attach them to newVirginia boats as they're commissioned into service.[3]
FollowingJohn H. Dalton, the class has seen a mix of names, such as;
The remaining four Block V boats have been named after U.S. cities. Of the first three Block VI boats, one has also been named for a city, while the other two are again outliers;
As of August 2025, whileArizona has so far been the last state name assigned, there has been no official change to the naming policy announced. Rather, it appears that the Navy is selecting names that are appropriate based on their history and availability, but vary due to changes in administrations and secretaries, and their preferences.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^And the possible exception ofUSS Shangri-La (CV-38), which can be said to have been named after a "battle," theDoolittle Raid
  2. ^Technically theEssex-class carriersFranklin,Randolph andHancock were named for the Continental Navy ships which bore the names of those men, not the men themselves.
  3. ^Long Beach was the last U.S. warship built on a true cruiser hull.

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Ship Naming in the United States Navy". Naval History and Heritage Command. Archived fromthe original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved24 July 2016.
  2. ^"About ARCO". cap.navy.mil. Retrieved23 March 2019.
  3. ^ab"Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress"(PDF).sgp.fas.org. 8 March 2023. Retrieved12 March 2023.
  4. ^abc"Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress"(PDF). fas.org.
  5. ^"SECNAV Names Two FutureVirginia-Class SubmarinesTang andWahoo". navy.mil.
  6. ^"Now Hear This – The Right Destroyer at the Right Time". U.S. Naval Institute. Retrieved27 October 2015.
  7. ^"Navy History and Heritage Command: Ship Naming". history.navy.mil. Archived fromthe original on 6 April 2019. Retrieved10 January 2018.
  8. ^Congressional Research Service (12 June 2013)."Navy Ship Names". United States Naval Institute. Retrieved7 November 2013.

External links

[edit]
Leadership
Structure
Operating
forces
Shore
Fleets
Ships
Personnel
and
training
People
Officers
Enlisted
Personnel
Training
Equipment
History and
traditions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_ship_naming_conventions&oldid=1323493443"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp