| UNSecurity Council Resolution 1973 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 States enforcing no-fly zone Libya | ||||
| Date | 17 March 2011 | |||
| Meeting no. | 6,498 | |||
| Code | S/RES/1973 (Document) | |||
| Subject | Libyan Civil War | |||
Voting summary |
| |||
| Result | Adopted | |||
| Security Council composition | ||||
Permanent members | ||||
Non-permanent members | ||||
| ||||
Resolution 1973 was adopted by theUnited Nations Security Council on 17 March 2011 in response to theFirst Libyan Civil War. The resolution formed the legal basis formilitary intervention in theLibyan Civil War, demanding "an immediateceasefire" and authorizing the international community to establish ano-fly zone and to use all means necessary short of foreign occupation to protect civilians.[1]
TheSecurity Council resolution was proposed byFrance,Lebanon, and theUnited Kingdom.[2][3] TenSecurity Council members voted in the affirmative (Bosnia and Herzegovina,Colombia,Gabon,Lebanon,Nigeria,Portugal,South Africa, and permanent membersFrance, theUnited Kingdom, and theUnited States). Five (Brazil,Germany, andIndia, and permanent membersChina andRussia) abstained, with none opposed.[4]
The resolution, adopted underChapter VII of the United Nations Charter:
| Approved (10) | Abstained (5) | Opposed (0) |
|---|---|---|
* Permanent members of the Security Council are in bold.
Permanent members China and Russia had reservations about the no-fly zone, including the practicalities of enforcing such a zone and concerns about the use of force when other means had not been exhausted, but had noted requests by theArab League and the "special situation" in Libya and thereforeabstained.[5] African members of the Security Council condemned the actions of the Libyan regime and supported the text.[6]
The following day, ChancellorAngela Merkel said that Germany would not take part in the military operation, but added: "We unreservedly share the aims of this resolution. Our abstention should not be confused with neutrality."[7] However, her foreign ministerGuido Westerwelle had publicly stated his opposition to the resolution.[8]
Indiaabstained because it perceived the resolution as being based on uncertain information (lack of "credible information on the situation on the ground in Libya") and as being too open-ended (lacking "clarity about details of enforcement measures, including who and with what assets will participate and how these measures will be exactly carried out").[9]
Brazil tooabstained noting the fundamental contradiction in using force to achieve an "immediate end to violence and the protection of civilians". They believed that the use of force
may have the unintended effect of exacerbating tensions on the ground and causing more harm than good to the very same civilians we are committed to protecting.
The Brazilian Ambassador Mrs. Viotti further observed that
...an important aspect of the popular movement in North Africa and the Middle East is their spontaneous, homegrown nature. We are also concerned about the possibility that the use of military force, as called for in paragraph 4 of today's resolution, could change that narrative in ways that may have serious repercussions for the situation in Libya and beyond.[9]
Libyan opposition forces inBenghazi cheered and fired guns and fireworks into the air as the resolution was adopted.[10] A few hours before issuing the resolution, Gaddafi warned the opposition with a speech saying, "We are coming tonight, and there will be no mercy".[11]
On 18 March,Muammar Gaddafi's government announced that they would comply with the resolution and implement a ceasefire.[12] However, it quickly became clear that no ceasefire had in fact been implemented.[13]
Military intervention in Libya began on 19 March, as fighter jets of theFrench Air Force destroyed several pro-Gaddafi vehicles advancing on rebel strongholdBenghazi.U.S. andBritish submarines then fired over 110Tomahawkcruise missiles at targets throughout Libya, severely disabling the regime'sair defense capability and allowing a wider enforcement of the no-fly zone to begin. A coalition of 10 states fromEurope and theMiddle East initially participated in the intervention, later expanding to 17. On 31 March,NATO assumed command of the operation. The intervention succeeded in preventing pro-Gaddafi forces from capturing Benghazi.[14]
On 24 August, it was acknowledged for the first time thatspecial forces troops from Britain,[15] Italy, France, Jordan,Qatar,[16] and theUAE[16] had intervened on the ground in Libyan territory, stepping up operations in Tripoli and other cities.[17] This has been questioned as a possible violation of Resolution 1973[18] although the use of special forces is not prohibited by the resolution.
Works related toUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 at Wikisource
