Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Traditionalist conservatism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Political ideology advocating traditional morals and social order
"New conservatism" redirects here. For the political movement which began in the U.S. during the 1960s, seeNeoconservatism.
Not to be confused withTraditionalist School.
This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
Globe icon.
The examples and perspective in this articlemay not represent aworldwide view of the subject. You mayimprove this article, discuss the issue on thetalk page, orcreate a new article, as appropriate.(May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Traditionalist conservatism" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article or sectionpossibly contains originalsynthesis. Source material shouldverifiably mention andrelate to the main topic. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page.(May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Part ofa series on
Conservatism

Traditionalist conservatism, often known asclassical conservatism, is apolitical andsocial philosophy that emphasizes the importance of transcendent moral principles, manifested through certain positednatural laws to which it is claimed society should adhere.[1] It is one of many different forms ofconservatism. Traditionalist conservatism, as known today, is rooted inEdmund Burke's political philosophy,[1] as well as the similar views ofJoseph de Maistre, who designated therationalist rejection ofChristianity during previous decades as being directly responsible for theReign of Terror which followed theFrench Revolution.[2][3] Traditionalists valuesocial ties and the preservation of ancestral institutions above what they perceive as excessiverationalism andindividualism.[1] One of the first uses of the phrase "conservatism" began around 1818 with amonarchist newspaper named "Le Conservateur", written byFrancois Rene de Chateaubriand with the help ofLouis de Bonald.

The concepts ofnation,culture,custom,convention, religious roots, andtradition are heavily emphasized in traditionalist conservatism.[4]Theoretical reason is regarded as of secondary importance topractical reason.[4] Thestate is also viewed as a social endeavor with spiritual andorganic characteristics. Traditionalists think that any positive change arises based within thecommunity's traditions rather than as a consequence of seeking a complete and deliberate break with the past.Leadership,authority, andhierarchy are seen as natural to humans.[4] Traditionalism, in the forms ofJacobitism, theCounter-Enlightenment and earlyRomanticism, arose in Europe during the 18th century as a backlash againstthe Enlightenment, as well as theEnglish andFrench Revolutions. More recent forms have included earlyGerman Romanticism,Carlism, and theGaelic revival. Traditionalist conservatism began to establish itself as an intellectual and political force in the mid-20th century.[5]

Key principles

[edit]
This sectionpossibly containsoriginal research. Pleaseimprove it byverifying the claims made and addinginline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.(May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Religious faith and natural law

[edit]
icon
This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(December 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

A number of traditionalist conservatives embracehigh churchChristianity (e.g.,T. S. Eliot, anAnglo-Catholic;Russell Kirk, aRoman Catholic;Rod Dreher, anEastern Orthodox Christian). Another traditionalist who has stated his faith tradition publicly isCaleb Stegall, anevangelical Protestant. A number of conservative mainline Protestants are also traditionalists, such asPeter Hitchens andRoger Scruton, and some traditionalists are Jewish, such as the lateWill Herberg,Irving Louis Horowitz,Mordecai Roshwald,Paul Gottfried andEva Brann. There are also American Muslim traditionalist conservatives likeHamza Yusuf.[6]

Natural law is championed byThomas Aquinas in theSumma Theologiae. There, he affirms the principle ofnoncontradiction ("the same thing cannot be affirmed and denied at the same time") as being the first principle of theoretical reason, and ("good is to be done and pursued and evil avoided") as the first principle of practical reason, or that which precedes and determines one's actions.[7] The account ofMedievalChristian philosophy is the appreciation of the concept of thesummum bonum or "highest good". It is only through the silentcontemplation that someone is able to achieve the idea of thegood.[8] The rest of natural law was first developed somewhat inAristotle's work,[9][10] also was referenced and affirmed in the works byCicero,[11] and it has been developed by the ChristianAlbert the Great.[12] This is not meant to imply that traditionalist conservatives must be Thomists and embrace a robustly Thomistic natural law theory. Individuals who embrace non-Thomistic understandings of natural law rooted in, e.g., non-Aristotelian accounts affirmed in segments of Greco-Roman, patristic, medieval, and Reformation thought, can identify with traditionalist conservatism.

Tradition and custom

[edit]

Traditionalists think thattradition andcustom should guide man and his worldview, as their names imply. Each generation inherits its ancestors' experience and culture, which man is able to transmit down to his offspring through custom and precedent.Edmund Burke, noted that "the individual is foolish, but the species is wise."[13] Furthermore, according toJohn Kekes, "tradition represents for conservatives a continuum enmeshing the individual and social, and is immune to reasoned critique."[14] Traditional conservatism typically preferspractical reason instead oftheoretical reason.

Conservatism, it has been argued, is based on living tradition rather than abstract political thinking. Within conservatism, political journalistEdmund Fawcett and historianXiao Gongqin argues the existence of two strains of conservative thought, a flexible conservatism associated withEdmund Burke (which allows for limited reform), and an inflexible conservatism associated withJoseph de Maistre (which is more reactionary).[15][16]

Within flexible conservatism, some commentators may break it down further, contrasting the "pragmatic conservatism" which is still quite skeptical of abstract theoretical reason, vs. the "rational conservatism" which does not have skepticism of said reason, and simply favors some sort of hierarchy as sufficient.[17]

Hierarchy, organicism, and authority

[edit]

Traditionalist conservatives believe that human society is essentiallyhierarchical (i.e., it always involves various interdependent inequalities, degrees, and classes) and that political structures that recognize this fact prove the most just, thriving, and generally beneficial. Hierarchy allows for the preservation of the whole community simultaneously, instead of protecting one part at the expense of the others.[18]

Organicism also characterizes conservative thought. Edmund Burke notably viewed society from an organicist standpoint,[19] as opposed to a more mechanistic view developed by liberal thinkers.[20] Two concepts play a role in organicism in conservative thought:

  • The internal elements of the organic society cannot be randomly reconfigured (similar to a living creature).
  • The organic society is based upon natural needs and instincts, rather than that of a new ideological blueprint conceived by political theorists.[21]

Traditional authority is a common tenet of conservatism, albeit expressed in different forms.Alexandre Kojève distinguished between two forms of traditional authority: the father (fathers, priests, monarchs) and the master (aristocrats, military commanders).[22] Obedience to said authority, whether familial or religious, continues to be a central tenet of conservatism to this day.

Integralism and divine law

[edit]

Integralism, typically a Catholic idea but also a broader religious one, asserts that faith and religious principles ought to be the basis for public law and policy when possible.[23] The goal of such a system is to integrate religious authority with political power.[24] While integralist principles have been sporadically associated with traditionalism, it was largely popularized by the works ofJoseph de Maistre.[25]

Agrarianism

[edit]

The countryside, as well as the values associated with it, are greatly valued (sometimes even being romanticized as in pastoral poetry).Agrarian ideals (such as conserving small family farms, open land, natural resource conservation, and land stewardship) are important to certain traditionalists' conception of rural life.[26]Louis de Bonald wrote a short piece on a comparison of the agriculturalism to industrialism.[27]

Family structure

[edit]

The importance of proper family structures is a common value expressed in conservatism. The concept of traditional morality is often coalesced withfamilialism andfamily values, being viewed as the bedrock of society within traditionalist thought.[28] Louis de Bonald wrote a piece on marital dissolution named "On Divorce" in 1802, outlining his opposition to the practice. Bonald stated that the broader human society was composed of three subunits (religious society – the church, domestic society – the family, public society – the state). He added that since the family made up one of these core categories, divorce would thereby represent an assault on the social order.[29]

Morality

[edit]

Morality, specifically traditionalmoral values, is a common area of importance within traditional conservatism, going back to Edmund Burke. Burke believed that a notion of sensibility was at the root of man's moral intuition.[30] Furthermore, he theorized that divine moral law was both transcendent and immanent within humans.[31] While moral discussions exist across the political aisle,[32] conservatism is distinct for including notions of purity-based reasoning.[33][34] The type of morality attributed to Edmund Burke is referred to some as moral traditionalism.[35]

Communitarianism

[edit]

Communitarianism is an ideology that broadly prioritizes the importance of the community over the individual's freedoms.Joseph de Maistre was notably against individualism, and blamed Rousseau's individualism on the destructive nature of the French revolution.[36] Some may argue that the communitarian ethic has considerable overlap with the conservative movement, although they remain distinct.[37] While communitarians may draw upon similar elements of moral infrastructure to make their arguments,[38] the communitarian opposition to liberalism is still more limited than that of conservatives.[39] Furthermore, the communitarian prescription for society is more limited in scope than that ofsocial conservatives.[40] The term is typically used in two different senses; philosophical communitarianism which rejects liberal precepts and atomistic theory, vs. ideological communitarianism which is a syncretistic belief that holds in priority the positive right to social services for members of said community.[41] Communitarianism may overlap withstewardship, in an environmental sense as well.

Social order

[edit]

Social order is a common tenet of conservatism, namely the maintenance ofsocial ties, whether the family or the law. The concept may also tie intosocial cohesion. Joseph de Maistre defended the necessity of the public executioner as encouraging stability. In theSt Petersburg Dialogues, he wrote: "all power, all subordination rests on the executioner: he is the horror and the bond of human association. Remove this incomprehensible agent from the world, and the very moment order gives way to chaos, thrones topple, and society disappears."[42]

The concept of social order is not exclusive to conservatism, although it tends to be fairly prevalent within it. Both Jean Jacques Rousseau and Joseph de Maistre believed in social order, the difference was that Maistre preferred the status quo, indivisibility of law and rule, and the mesh of Church with State. Meanwhile, Rousseau preferred social contract and the ability to withdraw from such (and pick the ruler) as well as a separation of Church and state. Furthermore, Rousseau went on the criticize the "cult of the state" as well.[43]

Classicism and high culture

[edit]

Traditionalists defend classicalWestern civilization and value an education informed by the sifting of texts starting in theRoman World and refined underMedievalScholasticism andRenaissance humanism. Similarly, traditionalist conservatives areClassicists who reverehigh culture in all of its manifestations (e.g.literature,Classical music,architecture,art, andtheatre).[citation needed]

Localism

[edit]

Traditionalists considerlocalism a core principle, described as a sense of devotion to one's homeland, in contrast to nationalists, who value the role of the state or nation over thelocal community. Traditionalist conservatives believe that allegiance to family, local community, and region is often more important than political commitments. Traditionalists also prioritize community closeness above nationalist state interest, preferring thecivil society of Burke's "little platoons". However, this does not mean that Conservatives are against state authority. Quite the opposite, rather Conservatives prefer simply that the state allow and encourage units like families and churches to thrive and develop.

Alternatively, some theorists state thatnationalism can easily be radicalized and lead tojingoism, which sees the state as apart from the local community and family structure rather than as a product of both.[44]

An example of a traditionalist conservative approach to immigration may be seen in BishopJohn Joseph Frederick Otto Zardetti's September 21, 1892 "Sermon on the Mother and the Bride", which was a defence of Roman CatholicGerman-Americans desire to preserve their faith, ancestral culture, and to continue speaking theirheritage language of theGerman language in the United States, against both theEnglish only movement and accusations of beingHyphenated Americans.[45]

History

[edit]

British influences

[edit]
Edmund Burke

Edmund Burke, an Anglo-IrishWhig statesman and philosopher whose political principles were rooted in moral natural law and the Western heritage, is one of the first expositors of traditionalist conservatism, althoughToryism represented an even earlier, more primitive form of traditionalist conservatism.[46][47] Burke believed in prescriptive rights, which he considered to be "God-given". He argued for what he called "ordered liberty" (best reflected in the unwritten law of the British constitutional monarchy). He also fought for universal ideals that were supported by institutions such as the church, the family, and the state.[48] He was a fierce critic of the principles behind theFrench Revolution, and in 1790, his observations on its excesses and radicalism were collected inReflections on the Revolution in France. InReflections, Burke called for the constitutional enactment of specific, concrete rights and warned that abstract rights could be easily abused to justify tyranny. American social critic and historianRussell Kirk wrote: "TheReflections burns with all the wrath and anguish of a prophet who saw the traditions of Christendom and the fabric of civil society dissolving before his eyes."[49]

Burke's influence was felt by later intellectuals and authors in both Britain and continental Europe. The English Romantic poetsSamuel Taylor Coleridge,William Wordsworth andRobert Southey, as well as Scottish Romantic authorSir Walter Scott,[50] and the counter-revolutionary writersFrançois-René de Chateaubriand,Louis de Bonald andJoseph de Maistre were all affected by his ideas.[51] Burke's legacy was best represented in the United States by theFederalist Party and its leaders, such as PresidentJohn Adams and Secretary of the TreasuryAlexander Hamilton.[52]

French influences

[edit]
Joseph de Maistre (1753–1821)

Joseph de Maistre, a French lawyer, was another founder of conservatism.[53] He was anultramontane Catholic, and thoroughly rejected progressivism and rationalism.[54] In 1796, he published a political pamphlet entitled,Considerations on France, that mirrored Burke'sReflections.[55][56][57] Maistre viewed the French revolution as "evil schism",[58] and a movement premised on the "sentiment of hatred". After the demise of Napoleon, Maistre returned to France to meet with pro-royalist circles. In 1819, Maistre published a piece calledDu Pape which outlined the Pope as the key sovereign, unto which authority derives from.[59]

Critics of material progress

[edit]

Threecultural conservatives andskeptics of material development,Samuel Taylor Coleridge,Thomas Carlyle, andJohn Henry Newman, were staunch supporters of Burke's classical conservatism.

According to conservative scholar Peter Viereck, Coleridge and his colleague and fellow poetWilliam Wordsworth began as followers of theFrench Revolution and the radical utopianism it engendered. Their collection of poems,Lyrical Ballads, published in 1798, however, rejected theEnlightenment notion of reason triumphing over faith and tradition. Later works by Coleridge, such asLay Sermons (1816),Biographia Literaria (1817) andAids to Reflection (1825), defended traditional conservative positions on hierarchy and organic society, criticism of materialism and the merchant class, and the need for "inner growth" that is rooted in a traditional and religious culture. Coleridge was a strong supporter of social institutions and an outspoken opponent ofJeremy Bentham and hisutilitarian theory.[60]

Thomas Carlyle, a writer, historian, and essayist, was an early traditionalist thinker, defending medieval ideals such as aristocracy, hierarchy, organic society, and class unity against communism andlaissez-fairecapitalism's "cash nexus." The "cash nexus," according to Carlyle, occurs when social interactions are reduced to economic gain. Carlyle, a lover of the poor, claimed that mobs, plutocrats, anarchists, communists, socialists, liberals, and others were threatening the fabric of British society by exploiting them and perpetuating class animosity. A devotee of Germanic culture andRomanticism, Carlyle is best known for his works,Sartor Resartus (1833–1834) andPast and Present (1843).[61]

TheOxford Movement, a religious movement aimed at restoring Anglicanism's Catholic nature, gave theChurch of England a "catholic rebirth" in the mid-19th century. TheTractarians (so named for the publication of theirTracts for the Times) criticizedtheological liberalism while preserving "dogma, ritual, poetry, [and] tradition," led byJohn Keble,Edward Pusey, andJohn Henry Newman. Newman (who converted to Roman Catholicism in 1845 and was later made a Cardinal and a canonized saint) and the Tractarians, like Coleridge and Carlyle, were critical of material progress, or the idea that money, prosperity, and economic gain constituted the totality of human existence.[62]

Cultural and artistic criticism

[edit]

Culture and the arts were also important to British traditionalist conservatives, and two of the most prominent defenders of tradition in culture and the arts wereMatthew Arnold andJohn Ruskin.

A poet and cultural commentator,Matthew Arnold is most recognized for his poems and literary, social, and religious criticism. His bookCulture and Anarchy (1869) criticized Victorian middle-class norms (Arnold referred to middle class tastes in literature as "philistinism") and advocated a return to ancient literature. Arnold was likewise skeptical of the plutocratic grasping at socioeconomic issues that had been denounced by Coleridge, Carlyle, and the Oxford Movement.[63] Arnold was a vehement critic of the Liberal Party and its Nonconformist base. He mocked Liberal efforts to disestablish the Anglican Church in Ireland, establish a Catholic university there, allow dissenters to be buried in Church of England cemeteries, demand temperance, and ignore the need to improve middle class members rather than impose their unreasonable beliefs on society. Education was essential, and by that, Arnold meant a close reading and attachment to the cultural classics, coupled with critical reflection.[64] He feared anarchy—the fragmentation of life into isolated facts that is caused by dangerous educational panaceas that emerge from materialistic and utilitarian philosophies. He was appalled at the shamelessness of the sensationalistic new journalism of the sort he witnessed on his tour of the United States in 1888. He prophesied, "If one were searching for the best means to efface and kill in a whole nation the discipline of self-respect, the feeling for what is elevated, he could do no better than take the American newspapers."[65]

One of the issues that traditionalist conservatives have often emphasized is that capitalism is just as suspect as theclassical liberalism that gave birth to it.[66] Cultural and artistic criticJohn Ruskin, a medievalist who considered himself a "Christian communist" and cared much about standards in culture, the arts, and society, continued this tradition. TheIndustrial Revolution, according to Ruskin (and all 19th-century cultural conservatives), had caused dislocation, rootlessness, and vast urbanization of the poor. He wroteThe Stones of Venice (1851–1853), a work of art criticism that attacked the Classical heritage while upholding Gothic art and architecture.The Seven Lamps of Architecture andUnto This Last (1860) were two of his other masterpieces.[67]

One-nation conservatism

[edit]

Burke, Coleridge, Carlyle, Newman, and other traditionalist conservatives' beliefs were distilled into former British Prime MinisterBenjamin Disraeli's politics and ideology. When he was younger, Disraeli was an outspoken opponent of middle-class capitalism and the Manchester liberals' industrial policies (the Reform Bill and the Corn Laws). In order to ameliorate the suffering of the urban poor in the aftermath of the Industrial Revolution, Disraeli proposed "one-nation conservatism," in which a coalition of aristocrats and commoners would band together to counter the liberal middle class's influence. This new coalition would be a way to interact with disenfranchised people while also rooting them in old conservative principles. Disraeli's ideas (especially his critique ofutilitarianism) were popularized in the "Young England" movement and in books likeVindication of the English Constitution (1835),The Radical Tory (1837), and his "social novels,"Coningsby (1844) andSybil (1845).[68] His one-nation conservatism was revived a few years later inLord Randolph Churchill's Tory democracy and in the early 21st century in British philosopherPhillip Blond'sRed Tory thesis.

Distributism

[edit]
Hilaire Belloc in 1915

In the early 20th century, traditionalist conservatism found its defenders through the efforts ofHilaire Belloc,G. K. Chesterton and other proponents of the socioeconomic system they advocated:distributism. Originating in the papal encyclicalRerum novarum, distributism employed the concept ofsubsidiarity as a "third way" solution to the twin evils of communism and capitalism. It favors local economies, small business, the agrarian way of life and craftsmen and artists. Otto von Bismarck implemented one of the first modern welfare systems in Germany during the 1880s. Traditional communities akin to those found in the Middle Ages were advocated in books like Belloc'sThe Servile State (1912),Economics for Helen (1924), andAn Essay on the Restoration of Property (1936), and Chesterton'sThe Outline of Sanity (1926), while big business and big government were condemned. Distributist views were accepted in the United States by the journalistHerbert Agar and Catholic activistDorothy Day as well as through the influence of the German-born British economistE. F. Schumacher, and were comparable toWilhelm Roepke's work.[69]

T. S. Eliot was a staunch supporter of Western culture and traditional Christianity. Eliot was a political reactionary who used literary modernism to achieve traditionalist goals. Following in the footsteps ofEdmund Burke,Samuel Taylor Coleridge,Thomas Carlyle,John Ruskin,G. K. Chesterton, andHilaire Belloc, he wroteAfter Strange Gods (1934), andNotes towards the Definition of Culture (1948). At Harvard University, where he was educated byIrving Babbitt andGeorge Santayana, Eliot was acquainted withAllen Tate andRussell Kirk.[70]

T. S. Eliot praisedChristopher Dawson as the most potent intellectual influence in Britain, and he was a prominent player in 20th-century traditionalism. The belief that religion was at the center of all civilization, especially Western culture, was central to his work, and his books reflected this view, notablyThe Age of Gods (1928),Religion and Culture (1948), andReligion and the Rise of Western Culture (1950). Dawson, a contributor to Eliot'sCriterion, believed that religion and culture were crucial to rebuilding the West after World War II in the aftermath offascism and the advent ofcommunism.[71]

In the United Kingdom

[edit]
Main article:High Tory
Part of aseries on
Toryism
Royal Oak

Philosophers

[edit]
Roger Scruton

Roger Scruton, a British philosopher, was a self-described traditionalist and conservative. One of his most well-known books,The Meaning of Conservatism (1980), is on foreign policy, animal rights, arts and culture, and philosophy. Scruton was a member of theAmerican Enterprise Institute, theInstitute for the Psychological Sciences, theTrinity Forum, and theCenter for European Renewal.Modern Age,National Review,The American Spectator,The New Criterion, andCity Journal were among the many publications for which he wrote.

Phillip Blond, a British philosopher, has recently gained notoriety as a proponent of traditionalist philosophy, specifically progressive conservatism, orRed Toryism. Blond believes that Red Toryism would rejuvenateBritish conservatism and society by combining civiccommunitarianism,localism, and traditional values. He has formed a think tank,ResPublica.

Publications and political organizations

[edit]

The oldest traditionalist publication in the United Kingdom isThe Salisbury Review, which was founded by British philosopherRoger Scruton. TheSalisbury Review's current managing editor is Merrie Cave.

A group of traditionalist MPs known as theCornerstone Group was created in 2005 within theBritish Conservative Party. The Cornerstone Group represents "faith, flag, and family" and stands for traditional values.Edward Leigh andJohn Henry Hayes are two notable members.

In Europe

[edit]

TheEdmund Burke Foundation is a traditionalist educational foundation established in the Netherlands and is modeled after theIntercollegiate Studies Institute. It was created by traditionalists such as academicAndreas Kinneging and journalistBart Jan Spruyt as a think tank. TheCenter for European Renewal is linked with it.

In 2007, a number of leading traditionalist scholars from Europe, as well as representatives of the Edmund Burke Foundation and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, created theCenter for European Renewal, which is designed to be the European version of the Intercollegiate Studies Institute.

In the United States

[edit]
Russell Kirk
Main article:Traditionalist conservatism in the United States

TheFederalists had no ties to European-style nobility, royalty, or organized churches when it came to "classical conservatism."John Adams was one of the first champions of a traditionalsocial order.[72]

TheWhig Party had an approach that mirrored Burkean conservatism in the post-Revolutionary era.Rufus Choate argued that lawyers were the guardians and preservers of the Constitution.[73] In the antebellum period,George Ticknor andEdward Everett were the "Guardians of Civilization."Orestes Brownson examined how America satisfies Catholic tradition and Western civilization. TheSouthern Agrarians, or Fugitives, were another group of traditionalist conservatives. In 1930, some of the Fugitives publishedI'll Take My Stand, which applied agrarian standards to politics and economics.

Following WWII, the initial stirrings of a "traditionalist movement" emerged. Certain conservative scholars and writers garnered the attention of the popular press.Russell Kirk'sThe Conservative Mind, an expansion of his PhD dissertation written in Scotland, was the book that defined the traditionalist school. Kirk was an independent scholar, writer, critic, and man of letters. He was friends withWilliam F. Buckley Jr., aNational Review columnist, editor, and syndicated columnist. WhenBarry Goldwater combated theRepublican Party's Eastern Establishment in 1964, Kirk backed him in the primaries and campaigned for him.[74] After Goldwater's defeat, theNew Right reunited in the late 1970s and found a new leader inRonald Reagan. Ronald Reagan created a coalition of libertarians, foreign-policy hawks, business conservatives, as well as Christian social conservatives and maintained his power by solidifying a newer form of conservative alliance that would continue to dominate the political landscape of the American conservatism to this day.

Political organizations

[edit]

TheTrinity Forum,Ellis Sandoz's Eric Voegelin Institute and the Eric Voegelin Society, the Conservative Institute's New Centurion Program, the T. S. Eliot Society, the Malcolm Muggeridge Society, and the Free Enterprise Institute's Center for the American Idea are all traditionalist groups. The Wilbur Foundation is a prominent supporter of traditionalist activities, particularly the Russell Kirk Center.

Literary

[edit]

Literary traditionalists are frequently associated withpolitical conservatives and theright wing, whilstexperimental works and theavant-garde are frequently associated withprogressives and theleft wing.John Barth, apostmodern writer and literary theorist, said: "I confess to missing, in apprentice seminars in the later 1970s and the 1980s, that lively Make-It-New spirit of the Buffalo Sixties. A roomful of young traditionalists can be as depressing as a roomful of young Republicans."[75]

James Fenimore Cooper,Nathaniel Hawthorne,James Russell Lowell,W. H. Mallock,Robert Frost andT. S. Eliot are among the literary figures covered inRussell Kirk'sThe Conservative Mind (1953). The writings ofRudyard Kipling andPhyllis McGinley are presented as instances of literary traditionalism in Kirk'sThe Conservative Reader (1982). Kirk was also a well-known author of spooky and suspense fiction with a Gothic flavor.Ray Bradbury andMadeleine L'Engle both praised novels such asOld House of Fear,A Creature of the Twilight, andLord of the Hollow Dark as well as short stories such as "Lex Talionis", "Lost Lake", "Beyond the Stumps", "Ex Tenebris," and "Fate's Purse." Kirk was also close friends with a number of 20th-century literary heavyweights, includingT. S. Eliot,Roy Campbell,Wyndham Lewis,Ray Bradbury,Madeleine L'Engle,Fernando Sánchez Dragó, andFlannery O'Connor, all of whom wrote conservative poetry or fiction.

Evelyn Waugh andG. K. Chesterton – British novelists andtraditionalist Catholics – are often considered traditionalist conservatives.[76]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcDeutsch & Fishman 2010, p. 2.
  2. ^DeMarco, Carl (January 1, 2023)."A Historical and Philosophical Comparison: Joseph de Maistre & Edmund Burke".The Gettysburg Historical Journal.22 (1).ISSN 2327-3917.
  3. ^"Book Review | Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition, by Edmund Fawcett".The Independent Institute. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  4. ^abcVincent 2009, p. 63.
  5. ^Sedgwick, Mark (2009).Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press.
  6. ^https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iawSzFZg-vw&pp=0gcJCRsBo7VqN5tD
  7. ^Aquinas, Thomas.Summa Theologica, I-II q. 94, a. 2c.
  8. ^A. Kojeve,Introduction to the Reading of Hegel (1980) p. 108
  9. ^Shellens, Max Solomon (1959)."Aristotle on Natural Law".Natural Law Forum.4 (1):72–100.doi:10.1093/ajj/4.1.72.
  10. ^Rommen, Heinrich A. (1959) [1947].The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social Philosophy. Translated by Hanley, Thomas R. B. Herder Book Co. p. 5.ISBN 978-0865971615.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  11. ^Meany, Paul."The Ancient Roman Cicero's idea of natural law has much to teach us about the evolution of liberty".www.libertarianism.org. RetrievedOctober 4, 2022.
  12. ^Cunningham, Stanley. Reclaiming Moral Agency: The Moral Philosophy of Albert the Great. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University Of America Press, 2008 p.207
  13. ^"First Principles – Prejudice".www.firstprinciplesjournal.com. RetrievedMarch 27, 2018.
  14. ^Hamilton, Andy (2016). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Many treat it as a standpoint that is sceptical of abstract reasoning in politics, and that appeals instead to living tradition, allowing for the possibility of limited political reform. On this view, conservatism is neither dogmatic reaction, nor the right-wing radicalism of Margaret Thatcher or contemporary American "neo-conservatives". Other commentators, however, contrast this "pragmatic conservatism" with a universalist "rational conservatism" that is not sceptical of reason, and that regards a community with a hierarchy of authority as most conducive to human well-being
  15. ^"Book Review | Conservatism: The Fight for a Tradition, by Edmund Fawcett".The Independent Institute. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  16. ^蕭功秦 (1997)."當代中國新保守主義的思想淵源"(PDF).二十一世纪 (40). RetrievedOctober 19, 2022.
  17. ^Hamilton, Andy (August 1, 2015)."Conservatism".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  18. ^Hamilton, Andy (2016). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Conservatism's "organic" social vision is inherently sceptical of the state, and puts faith instead in the family, private property and religion
  19. ^"The New Conservatism, c.1885–1914".academic.oup.com. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  20. ^"Edmund Burke (1729–1797)".www.tutor2u.net. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  21. ^"2c. Organic society or state".Political Investigations. June 19, 2018. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  22. ^"The Notion of Authority".Verso. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  23. ^O.Cist, Edmund Waldstein (October 31, 2018)."What Is Integralism Today?".Church Life Journal. RetrievedFebruary 12, 2024.
  24. ^Clary, Stephanie (October 14, 2019)."What is Catholic integralism?".U.S. Catholic. RetrievedFebruary 12, 2024.
  25. ^"Europe as Viewed by Joseph de Maistre | EHNE".ehne.fr. RetrievedFebruary 12, 2024.
  26. ^Frohnen, Bruce; Beer, Jeremy; Jeffrey, Nelson O. (May 20, 2014).American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Open Road Media.ISBN 9781497651579.Link to page
  27. ^"On the Agricultural Family LOUIS DE BONALD 1826 – Hearth & Field". RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  28. ^Johnson, Stephen D.; Tamney, Joseph B. (1996)."The Political Impact of Traditional Family Values".Sociological Focus.29 (2):125–134.doi:10.1080/00380237.1996.10570635.ISSN 0038-0237.JSTOR 20831777.
  29. ^Nicholas, Davidson (2017)."On Divorce Louis de Bonald".philpapers.org. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  30. ^"The Moral Imperative of Edmund Burke".The Russell Kirk Center. May 19, 2013. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  31. ^Kilcup, Rodeny W (1979)."Reason and the Basis of Morality in Burke".Journal of the History of Philosophy.17 (3):271–284.doi:10.1353/hph.2008.0506.ISSN 1538-4586.S2CID 147394651.
  32. ^Stewart, Brandon D.; Morris, David S. M. (2021)."Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat".Frontiers in Psychology.12.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908.ISSN 1664-1078.PMC 8096906.PMID 33967876.
  33. ^Haidt, Jonathan (2007)."When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize"(PDF).www.unl.edu. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  34. ^Stewart, Brandon D.; Morris, David S. M. (2021)."Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat".Frontiers in Psychology.12.doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908.ISSN 1664-1078.PMC 8096906.PMID 33967876.
  35. ^Haller, Markus (September 2001)."Edmund Burke's Moral Traditionalism".Swiss Political Science Review.7 (3):1–19.doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2001.tb00320.x.ISSN 1424-7755.
  36. ^Maistre, Joseph de (1996).Against Rousseau: On the State of Nature and on the Sovereignty of the People. Mcgill-Queen's University Press. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.{{cite book}}:|website= ignored (help)
  37. ^Young, M. (June 1, 2020)."Conservatism and Communitarianism: Two or One?".Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy.4:58–71.
  38. ^"Communitarianism | Encyclopedia.com".www.encyclopedia.com. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  39. ^Hamilton, Andy (2020),"Conservatism", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrievedJanuary 24, 2024
  40. ^Etzioni, Amitai (2003)."What is Political?".Social Science Research Network.SSRN 2157170. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  41. ^"Communitarianism – By Branch / Doctrine – The Basics of Philosophy".www.philosophybasics.com. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  42. ^"Joseph de Maistre | Counter-Enlightenment, Catholic Reformer, Political Philosopher | Britannica".www.britannica.com. RetrievedJanuary 25, 2024.
  43. ^Runte, Roseann (1997)."Against Rousseau by Joseph de Maistre (review)".University of Toronto Quarterly.67 (1):220–221.ISSN 1712-5278.
  44. ^"First Principles – Localism".www.firstprinciplesjournal.com. RetrievedMarch 27, 2018.
  45. ^Vincent A. Yzermans (1988),Frontier Bishop of Saint Cloud, Park Press,Waite Park, Minnesota. Pages 117–138.
  46. ^"Tory",Wikipedia, August 27, 2023, retrievedSeptember 14, 2023
  47. ^"High Tory",Wikipedia, August 26, 2023, retrievedSeptember 14, 2023
  48. ^Frohnen, Bruce, Jeremy Beer, and Jeffrey O. Nelson (2006)American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, pp. 107–09.
  49. ^Kirk, Russell (1967, 1997)Edmund Burke: A Genius Reconsidered. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, p. 154.
  50. ^Kirk, Russell (1976, 1997)Edmund Burke: A Genius Reconsidered. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, p. 155
  51. ^Blum, Christopher Olaf, ed. (2004)Critics of the Enlightenment, Wilington, DE: ISI Books, pp. xv–xxxv.
  52. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 87–95.
  53. ^"Joseph de Maistre | McGill-Queen's University Press".www.mqup.ca. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  54. ^Krause, Paul (August 26, 2022)."Joseph De Maistre and the Importance of Social Order".Discourses on Minerva. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  55. ^"Considerations on France",Wikipedia, December 8, 2023, retrievedJanuary 27, 2024
  56. ^"Maistre: Considerations on France | Texts in political thought".Cambridge University Press. RetrievedJanuary 27, 2024.
  57. ^Maistre, Joseph de (1994). Lebrun, Richard A. (ed.).Maistre: Considerations on France. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-46628-8.
  58. ^Krause, Paul (August 23, 2022)."Joseph De Maistre and the Metaphysics of the French Revolution".Discourses on Minerva. RetrievedJanuary 23, 2024.
  59. ^"Joseph de Maistre".Oxford Reference. RetrievedJanuary 24, 2024.
  60. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 34–37.
  61. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 37–39.
  62. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 39–40.
  63. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, p. 40.
  64. ^Brendan A. Rapple (2017).Matthew Arnold and English Education: The Poet's Pioneering Advocacy in Middle Class Instruction. McFarland. p. 116.ISBN 9781476663593.
  65. ^Quoted inRichard M. Weaver (1948).Ideas Have Consequences: Expanded Edition (2013). U of Chicago Press. p. 26.ISBN 9780226090238.{{cite book}}:ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  66. ^DiNunzio, Mario.Who Stole Conservatism? Capitalism And the Disappearance of Traditional Conservatism.
  67. ^Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006) Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 40–41.
  68. ^Viereck, pp. 42–45.
  69. ^Frohnen, Bruce, Jeremy Beer, and Jeffrey O. Nelson (2006)American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, pp. 235–36.
  70. ^Frohnen, Bruce, Jeremy Beer, and Jeffrey O. Nelson (2006)American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, pp. 263–66.
  71. ^Frohnen, Bruce, Jeremy Beer, and Jeffrey O. Nelson (2006)American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, pp. 219–20.
  72. ^Allitt, Patrick,The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History (Yale University Press, 2009) p. 12
  73. ^Muller, Jerry Z., ed.Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present (Princeton University, 1997) pp. 152–66.
  74. ^Kirk, Russell. (1995)The Sword of Imagination: Memoirs of a Half-Century of Literary Conflict. Grand Rapids, MI:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., pp. 285–288.
  75. ^John Barth (1984) intro toThe Literature of Exhaustion, inThe Friday Book.
  76. ^Traditionalism: between the past and the present, nytimes.com

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Deutsch, Kenneth L.; Fishman, Ethan (2010).The Dilemmas of American Conservatism. University Press of Kentucky.ISBN 978-0-813-13962-3.
  • Vincent, Andrew (2009).Modern Political Ideologies. John Wiley & Sons.ISBN 978-1-444-31105-1.

Further reading

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

General references

[edit]
  • Allitt, Patrick (2009)The Conservatives: Ideas and Personalities Throughout American History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Critchlow, Donald T. (2007)The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dunn, Charles W., and J. David Woodard (2003)The Conservative Tradition in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Edwards, Lee (2004)A Brief History of the Modern American Conservative Movement. Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation.
  • Frohnen, Bruce, Jeremy Beer, and Jeffrey O. Nelson (2006)American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.
  • Gottfried, Paul, and Thomas Fleming (1988)The Conservative Movement. Boston: Twayne Publishers.
  • Nash, George H. (1976, 2006)The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.
  • Nisbet, Robert (1986)Conservatism: Dream and Reality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Regnery, Alfred S. (2008)Upstream: The Ascendance of American Conservatism. New York: Threshold Editions.
  • Viereck, Peter (1956, 2006)Conservative Thinkers from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

By the New Conservatives

[edit]
  • Bestor, Arthur (1953, 1988)Educational Wastelands: The Retreat from Learning in Our Public Schools. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Boorstin, Daniel (1953)The Genius of American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Chalmers, Gordon Keith (1952)The Republic and the Person: A Discussion of Necessities in Modern American Education. Chicago: Regnery.
  • Hallowell, John (1954, 2007)The Moral Foundation of Democracy. Indianapolis:Liberty Fund Inc.
  • Heckscher, August (1947)A Pattern of Politics. New York: Reynal and Hitchcock.
  • Kirk, Russell (1953, 2001)The Conservative Mind. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
  • Kirk, Russell (1982)The Portable Conservative Reader. New York: Penguin.
  • Nisbet, Robert (1953, 1990)The Quest for Community: A Study in the Ethics of Order and Freedom. San Francisco: ICS Press.
  • Smith, Mortimer (1949)And Madly Teach. Chicago:Henry Regnery Co.
  • Viereck, Peter (1949, 2006)Conservatism Revisited: The Revolt Against Ideology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Vivas, Eliseo (1950, 1983)The Moral Life and the Ethical Life. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Voegelin, Eric (1952, 1987)The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Weaver, Richard (1948, 1984)Ideas Have Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Wilson, Francis G. (1951, 1990)The Case for Conservatism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Schools
by region
International
Asia
China
Iran
Israel
Japan
South Korea
Turkey
Other
Europe
France
Germany
Italy
Poland
Russia
Spain
United
Kingdom
Other
Latin America
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Other
North America
Canada
United
States
Oceania
Philosophy
Principles
Intellectuals
Politics
Organisations
Politicians
Religion
Historical
background
Related
Ideologies
Authority control databases: NationalEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traditionalist_conservatism&oldid=1319278921"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp