Inphysics,topological order[1] describes a state orphase of matter that arises in a system with non-local interactions, such as entanglement inquantum mechanics, and floppy modes in elastic systems.[2] Whereas classical phases of matter such as gases and solids correspond to microscopic patterns in the spatial arrangement of particles arising from short range interactions, topological orders correspond to patterns of long-rangequantum entanglement.[3] States with different topological orders (or different patterns of long range entanglements) cannot change into each other without a phase transition.
Matter composed ofatoms can have different properties and appear in different forms, such assolid,liquid,superfluid, etc. These various forms of matter are often calledstates of matter orphases. According tocondensed matter physics and the principle ofemergence, the different properties of materials generally arise from the different ways in which the atoms are organized in the materials. Those different organizations of the atoms (or other particles) are formally called theorders in the materials.[14]
Atoms can organize in many ways which lead to many different orders and many different types of materials. Landausymmetry-breaking theory provides a general understanding of these different orders. It points out that different orders really correspond to different symmetries in the organizations of the constituent atoms. As a material changes from one order to another order (i.e., as the material undergoes aphase transition), what happens is that the symmetry of the organization of the atoms changes.
For example, atoms have a random distribution in aliquid, so a liquid remains the same as we displace atoms by an arbitrary distance. We say that a liquid has acontinuous translation symmetry. After a phase transition, a liquid can turn into acrystal. In a crystal, atoms organize into a regular array (alattice). A lattice remains unchanged only when we displace it by a particular distance (integer times alattice constant), so a crystal has onlydiscrete translation symmetry. The phase transition between a liquid and a crystal is a transition that reduces the continuous translation symmetry of the liquid to the discrete symmetry of the crystal. Similarly this holds for rotational symmetry. Such a change in symmetry is calledsymmetry breaking. The essence of the difference between liquids and crystals is therefore that the organizations of atoms have different symmetries in the two phases.
Landausymmetry-breaking theory has been a very successful theory. For a long time, physicists believed that Landau Theory described all possible orders in materials, and all possible (continuous) phase transitions.
However, since the late 1980s, it has become gradually apparent that Landau symmetry-breaking theory may not describe all possible orders. In an attempt to explainhigh temperature superconductivity[15] thechiral spin state was introduced.[6][7] At first, physicists still wanted to use Landau symmetry-breaking theory to describe the chiral spin state. They identified the chiral spin state as a state that breaks the time reversal and parity symmetries, but not the spin rotation symmetry. This should be the end of the story according to Landau's symmetry breaking description of orders. However, it was quickly realized that there are many different chiral spin states that have exactly the same symmetry, so symmetry alone was not enough to characterize different chiral spin states. This means that the chiral spin states contain a new kind of order that is beyond the usual symmetry description.[16] The proposed, new kind of order was named "topological order".[1] The name "topological order" is motivated by the low energyeffective theory of the chiral spin states which is atopological quantum field theory (TQFT).[17][18][19] New quantum numbers, such asground state degeneracy[16] (which can be defined on a closed space or an open space with gapped boundaries, including both Abelian topological orders[20][21] and non-Abelian topological orders[22][23]) and thenon-Abeliangeometric phase of degenerate ground states,[1] were introduced to characterize and define the different topological orders in chiral spin states. More recently, it was shown that topological orders can also be characterized bytopological entropy.[24][25]
But experiments[which?] soon indicated[how?] that chiral spin states do not describe high-temperature superconductors, and the theory of topological order became a theory with no experimental realization. However, the similarity between chiral spin states andquantum Hall states allows one to use the theory of topological order to describe different quantum Hall states.[4] Just like chiral spin states, different quantum Hall states all have the same symmetry and are outside the Landau symmetry-breaking description. One finds that the different orders in different quantum Hall states can indeed be described by topological orders, so the topological order does have experimental realizations.
Thefractional quantum Hall (FQH) state was discovered in 1982[10][11] before the introduction of the concept of topological order in 1989. But the FQH state is not the first experimentally discovered topologically ordered state. Thesuperconductor, discovered in 1911, is the first experimentally discovered topologically ordered state; it hasZ2 topological order.[note 1]
Although topologically ordered states usually appear in strongly interacting boson/fermion systems, a simple kind of topological order can also appear in free fermion systems. This kind of topological order corresponds to integral quantum Hall state, which can be characterized by theChern number of the filled energy band if we consider integer quantum Hall state on a lattice. Theoretical calculations have proposed that such Chern numbers can be measured for a free fermion system experimentally.[29][30]It is also well known that such a Chern number can be measured (maybe indirectly) byedge states.
The most important characterization of topological orders would be the underlying fractionalized excitations (such asanyons) and their fusion statistics and braiding statistics (which can go beyond thequantum statistics ofbosons orfermions). Current research works show that the loop and string like excitations exist for topological orders in the 3+1 dimensional spacetime, and their multi-loop/string-braiding statistics are the crucial signatures for identifying 3+1 dimensional topological orders.[31][32][33] The multi-loop/string-braiding statistics of 3+1 dimensional topological orders can be captured by the link invariants of particulartopological quantum field theory in 4 spacetime dimensions.[33]
A large class of 2+1D topological orders is realized through a mechanism calledstring-net condensation.[34] This class of topological orders can have a gapped edge and are classified by unitary fusion category (ormonoidal category) theory. One finds that string-net condensation can generate infinitely many different types of topological orders, which may indicate that there are many different new types of materials remaining to be discovered.
The collective motions of condensed strings give rise to excitations above the string-net condensed states. Those excitations turn out to begauge bosons. The ends of strings are defects which correspond to another type of excitations. Those excitations are thegauge charges and can carryFermi orfractional statistics.[35]
The condensations of other extended objects such as "membranes",[36] "brane-nets",[37] andfractals also lead to topologically ordered phases[38] and "quantum glassiness".[39][40]
We know thatgroup theory is the mathematical foundation of symmetry-breaking orders. What is the mathematical foundation of topological order? It was found that a subclass of 2+1D topological orders—Abelian topological orders—can be classified by a K-matrix approach.[41][42][43][44] The string-net condensation suggests that tensor category (such asfusion category ormonoidal category) is part of the mathematical foundation of topological order in 2+1D. The more recent researches suggest that(up to invertible topological orders that have no fractionalized excitations):
2+1D bosonic topological orders are classified by unitary modular tensor categories.
2+1D bosonic topological orders with symmetry G are classified by G-crossed tensor categories.
2+1D bosonic/fermionic topological orders with symmetry G are classified by unitary braided fusion categories over symmetric fusion category, that has modular extensions. The symmetric fusion category Rep(G) for bosonic systems and sRep(G) for fermionic systems.
Topological order in higher dimensions may be related to n-Category theory. Quantumoperator algebra is a very important mathematical tool in studying topological orders.
Some also suggest that topological order is mathematically described byextended quantum symmetry.[45]
The materials described by Landau symmetry-breaking theory have had a substantial impact on technology. For example,ferromagnetic materials that breakspin rotation symmetry can be used as the media of digital information storage. A hard drive made of ferromagnetic materials can storegigabytes of information.Liquid crystals that break the rotational symmetry ofmolecules find wide application in display technology. Crystals that break translation symmetry lead to well definedelectronic bands which in turn allow us to makesemiconducting devices such astransistors. Different types of topological orders are even richer than different types of symmetry-breaking orders. This suggests their potential for exciting, novel applications.
One theorized application would be to use topologically ordered states as media forquantum computing in a technique known astopological quantum computing. A topologically ordered state is a state with complicated non-localquantum entanglement. The non-locality means that the quantum entanglement in a topologically ordered state is distributed among many different particles. As a result, the pattern of quantum entanglements cannot be destroyed by local perturbations. This significantly reduces the effect ofdecoherence. This suggests that if we use different quantum entanglements in a topologically ordered state to encode quantum information, the information may last much longer.[46] The quantum information encoded by the topological quantum entanglements can also be manipulated by dragging the topological defects around each other. This process may provide a physical apparatus for performingquantum computations.[47] Therefore, topologically ordered states may provide natural media for bothquantum memory and quantum computation. Such realizations of quantum memory and quantum computation may potentially be madefault tolerant.[12]
Topologically ordered states in general have a special property that they contain non-trivial boundary states. In many cases, those boundary states become perfect conducting channel that can conduct electricity without generating heat.[48] This can be another potential application of topological order in electronic devices.
Similarly to topological order,topological insulators[49][50] also have gapless boundary states. The boundary states of topological insulators play a key role in the detection and the application of topological insulators.This observation naturally leads to a question:are topological insulators examples of topologically ordered states?In fact topological insulators are different from topologically ordered states defined in this article.Topological insulators only have short-ranged entanglements and have no topological order, while the topological order defined in this article is a pattern of long-range entanglement. Topological order is robust against any perturbations. It has emergent gauge theory, emergent fractional charge and fractional statistics. In contrast, topological insulators are robust only against perturbations that respect time-reversal and U(1) symmetries. Their quasi-particle excitations have no fractional charge and fractional statistics. Strictly speaking, topological insulator is an example ofsymmetry-protected topological (SPT) order,[51] where the first example of SPT order is theHaldane phase of spin-1 chain.[52][53][54][55] But the Haldane phase of spin-2 chain has no SPT order.
Landausymmetry-breaking theory is a cornerstone ofcondensed matter physics. It is used to define the territory of condensed matter research. The existence of topological order appears to indicate that nature is much richer than Landausymmetry-breaking theory has so far indicated. So topological order opens up a new direction in condensed matter physics—a new direction of highly entangled quantum matter. We realize that quantum phases of matter (i.e. the zero-temperature phases of matter) can be divided into two classes: long range entangled states and short range entangled states.[3] Topological order is the notion that describes the long range entangled states: topological order = pattern of long range entanglements. Short range entangled states are trivial in the sense that they all belong to one phase. However, in the presence of symmetry, even short range entangled states are nontrivial and can belong to different phases. Those phases are said to containSPT order.[51] SPT order generalizes the notion of topological insulator to interacting systems.
^Note that superconductivity can be described by theGinzburg–Landau theory with dynamical U(1) EM gauge field, which is aZ2 gauge theory, that is, an effective theory ofZ2 topological order. The prediction of the vortex state in superconductors was one of the main successes of Ginzburg–Landau theory with dynamical U(1) gauge field. The vortex in the gauged Ginzburg–Landau theory is nothing but theZ2 flux line in theZ2 gauge theory. The Ginzburg–Landau theory without the dynamical U(1) gauge field fails to describe the real superconductors with dynamical electromagnetic interaction.[9][26][27][28] However, in condensed matter physics, superconductor usually refers to a state with non-dynamical EM gauge field. Such a state is a symmetry breaking state with no topological order.
^Wen, Xiao-Gang (1991). "Topological Orders and Chern-Simons Theory in Strongly Correlated Quantum Liquid".Int. J. Mod. Phys. B.5 (10): 1641.Bibcode:1991IJMPB...5.1641W.CiteSeerX10.1.1.676.1963.doi:10.1142/s0217979291001541.; Topological Orders and Chern–Simons Theory in strongly correlated quantum liquid. a review containing comments on topological orders in higher dimensions and/or inHiggs phases; also introduced a dimension index (DI) to characterize the robustness of the ground state degeneracy of a topologically ordered state. If DI is less or equal to 1, then topological orders cannot exist at finite temperature.
Off-diagonal long-range order, oblique confinement, and the fractional quantum Hall effect, S. M. Girvin and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.,58, 1252 (1987)
Effective-Field-Theory Model for the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, S. C. Zhang and T. H. Hansson and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett.,62, 82 (1989)
Xiao-Gang Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many Body Systems – From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2004.
Yetter, David N. (1993). "TQFT'S from Homotopy 2-Types".Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications.2 (1):113–123.doi:10.1142/s0218216593000076.
Landsman N. P. and Ramazan B., Quantization of Poisson algebras associated to Lie algebroids, inProc. Conf. on Groupoids in Physics, Analysis and Geometry(Boulder CO, 1999)', Editors J. Kaminker et al.,159{192 Contemp. Math. 282, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 2001, (alsomath{ph/001005.)
Levin A. and Olshanetsky M., Hamiltonian Algebroids and deformations of complex structures on Riemann curves,hep-th/0301078v1.
Xiao-Gang Wen, Yong-Shi Wu and Y. Hatsugai., Chiral operator product algebra and edge excitations of a FQH droplet (pdf),Nucl. Phys. B422, 476 (1994): Used chiral operator product algebra to construct the bulk wave function, characterize the topological orders and calculate the edge states for some non-Abelian FQH states.
Xiao-Gang Wen and Yong-Shi Wu., Chiral operator product algebra hidden in certain FQH states (pdf),Nucl. Phys. B419, 455 (1994): Demonstrated that non-Abelian topological orders are closely related to chiral operator product algebra (instead ofconformal field theory).
Baianu, I. C. (2007). "A Non-Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity".Axiomathes.17 (3–4):353–408.doi:10.1007/s10516-007-9012-1.S2CID3909409..
R. Brown, P.J. Higgins, P. J. and R. Sivera, "Nonabelian Algebraic Topology: filtered spaces, crossed complexes, cubical homotopy groupoids"EMS Tracts in Mathematics Vol 15 (2011),
