Thomas Pangle | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | Thomas Lee Pangle 1944 (age 80–81) Gouverneur, New York, U.S. |
| Education | Cornell University (BA) University of Chicago (PhD) |
| Occupation | Political scientist |
| Spouse | Lorraine Smith Pangle |
Thomas Lee Pangle,FRSC (born 1944) is an Americanpolitical scientist. He holds the Joe R. Long Chair in Democratic Studies in the Department of Government and is Co-Director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for Core Texts and Ideas at theUniversity of Texas at Austin. He has also taught at theUniversity of Toronto andYale University. He was a student ofLeo Strauss.
Pangle was born and grew up inGouverneur, New York.[1] He graduated fromCornell University with aBachelor of Artsdegree in 1966, "with distinction in all subjects" and ranked fifth in class, having studied political philosophy underAllan Bloom. Pangle received hisPh.D. in political science in 1972 from theUniversity of Chicago. Hisdissertation was "Montesquieu and the Moral Basis of Liberal Democracy," completed under the supervision ofJoseph Cropsey,Herbert Storing, andRichard E. Flathman.
From 1971 to 1979 he taught atYale University, first as alecturer and then as anassistant professor andassociate professor. In 1979 he was appointed to Graduate School at the University of Toronto as an Associate Professor and was awardedtenure. He became a professor in 1983 and was named University Professor in 2001. During his tenure at the University of Toronto Pangle was first afellow atVictoria College from 1979 to 1984 and then atSt. Michael's College from 1985 to 2004. Pangle left the University of Toronto after 25 years to accept the position of Joe R. Long Chair in Democratic Studies in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, citing concerns aboutmandatory retirement.
Pangle was a visiting professor at the University of Chicago in 1984 and at theÉcole des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in 1987.
Pangle is married to fellow professorLorraine Smith Pangle, who was also a faculty member at the University of Toronto and is a professor in the Department of Government at the University of Texas.
Pangle's writings on ancient political philosophy attempt to show how Socratic arguments for the supremacy of the philosophic life shape, enrich, and ground the classical republican teaching on civic and moral virtue and on the spiritual goals of self-government. His studies of medieval and biblical political thought seek to revive the mutually challenging dialogue between the competing Socratic and scriptural notions of wisdom and of the cultivation of wisdom in civic life.
His interpretations of the thought of the American Founding, and of its philosophic foundations inLocke andMontesquieu, prepares the ground for his exposition ofNietzsche as the most radical critic of modern rationalism. These studies argue for the significance, within modernity, of a continued if eclipsed commitment to the life of understanding pursued for its own sake. At the same time, Pangle diagnoses the costs and the benefits—for civic virtue as well as for the life of the mind—of the diminished public or civic status of the moral and intellectual virtues in modern republicanism.
Pangle is a Fellow of theRoyal Society of Canada, and has wonGuggenheim,Killam-Canada Council,Carl Friedrich von Siemens, and fourNational Endowment for the Humanities fellowships. He has been awarded The Benton Bowl atYale University (for contribution to education in politics) and theRobert Foster Cherry Great Teacher of the World Prize,Baylor University. In 2007 he delivered, at the invitation of theBavarian Academy of Sciences, theWerner Heisenberg Lecture. A Festschrift in his honor was published as: Recovering Reason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle. Edited by Timothy Burns. Lexington Books, 2010.
Inspired and guided byLeo Strauss's revival of Platonic political philosophy, Pangle's work has as its unifying aim the clarification and defense of the original Socratic conception of political philosophy. In the manner that Pangle understands it, the Socratic conception is controversial.
What the Socratic conception of political theory amounts to, Pangle contends, is a lifelong vindication, through conversational refutations that purify common sense notions of justice and nobility, of self-knowledge and of inquiry into the nature of things as the highest and supremely fulfilling dimension of human existence. This notion of the true human good, as the good that makes all relativistic and egalitarian outlooks appear impoverished, obviously contradicts or directly clashes with what most people today are told and believe is the life they ought to lead. Pangle asserts that the awakened philosophic life is the only truly human life.
Pangle was denied tenure atYale University, in a scandal, during which a senior colleague explained, in a pronouncement (which became the theme of a protest panel at the annual convention of theAmerican Political Science Association): "academic freedom is one thing, but there are two types who will never be permitted tenure at Yale: Leninists and Straussians." TheWall Street Journal ("Dry Rot at College," Editorial Aug. 31, 1979, p. 6),Commentary ("God and Man at Yale—Again," by Robert Kagan, February, 1982; Letters exchange, August, 1982) and other journals (The New York Review of Books, May 12, 1983, pp. 56–57, "Saving the Free World: An Exchange," statement by Eugene Genovese;Yale Political Monthly, Dec. 1979, pp. 2–11, "Academic Freedom at Yale: the Pangle Case"), published editorials, columns, and articles attackingYale's denial of academic freedom. Yale or its spokespersons denied the imputations.Yale set up a judiciary panel, led by the historianEdmund Morgan, to hear the case—amid campus-wide protests and marches on Pangle's behalf (Yale Daily News, Sept. 10, 1979, p. 1, "2,300 Students Protest Tenure Policy"); the panel decided in Pangle's favor and rescinded the decision denying tenure by the Department of Political Science, on the basis of testimony from graduate students about what Political Science faculty had declared in public about the grounds on which Pangle was being denied tenure.Yale instituted a new procedure that took the decision out of the hands of the department and lodged it in a board, specially designed for Pangle's tenure review, that was composed of five scholars, two not from Yale (led byPeter Gay): Yale University News Release, Monday afternoon, Oct. 15, 1979;Yale Weekly Bulletin and Calendar, Oct. 22–29, 1979, p. 1;Yale Daily News, Extra Edition, Oct. 16, 1979, "Pangle Wins New Tenure Review: Original Decision Overruled; Professor says he is 'gratified'". At that point, Pangle resigned, having been offered a tenured position at the University of Toronto (see entries onC. B. Macpherson andAllan Bloom)—and because, as he declared, he no longer felt he could comfortably live with his colleagues in theYale Political Science Department.
