Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Theoretical physics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromTheoretical physicist)
Branch of physics
Visual representation of aSchwarzschild wormhole. Wormholes have never been observed, but they are predicted to exist throughmathematical models andscientific theory.

Theoretical physics is a branch ofphysics that employsmathematical models andabstractions of physical objects and systems to rationalize, explain, and predictnatural phenomena. This is in contrast toexperimental physics, which uses experimental tools to probe these phenomena.

The advancement ofscience generally depends on the interplay betweenexperimental studies andtheory. In some cases, theoretical physics adheres to standards ofmathematical rigour while giving little weight to experiments and observations.[a] For example, while developingspecial relativity,Albert Einstein was concerned with theLorentz transformation which leftMaxwell's equations invariant, but was apparently uninterested in theMichelson–Morley experiment onEarth's drift through aluminiferous aether.[1] Conversely, Einstein was awarded theNobel Prize for explaining thephotoelectric effect, previously an experimental result lacking a theoretical formulation.[2]

Overview

[edit]

Aphysical theory is a model of physical events. It is judged by the extent to which its predictions agree with empirical observations. The quality of a physical theory is also judged on its ability to make new predictions which can be verified by new observations. A physical theory differs from amathematical theorem in that while both are based on some form ofaxioms, judgment of mathematical applicability is not based on agreement with any experimental results.[3][4] A physical theory similarly differs from amathematical theory, in the sense that the word "theory" has a different meaning in mathematical terms.[b]

Ric=kg{\displaystyle \mathrm {Ric} =kg}The equations for anEinstein manifold, used ingeneral relativity to describe the curvature ofspacetime

A physical theory involves one or more relationships between various measurable quantities.Archimedes realized that a ship floats by displacing its mass of water,Pythagoras understood the relation between the length of avibrating string and the musical tone it produces.[5][6] Other examples includeentropy as a measure of the uncertainty regarding the positions andmotions of unseenparticles and thequantum mechanical idea that (action and)energy are not continuously variable.[citation needed]

Theoretical physics consists of several different approaches. In this regard,theoretical particle physics forms a good example. For instance: "phenomenologists" might employ (semi-)empirical formulas andheuristics to agree with experimental results, oftenwithout deep physical understanding.[c] "Modelers" (also called "model-builders") often appear much like phenomenologists, but try to model speculative theories that have certain desirable features (rather than on experimental data), or apply the techniques ofmathematical modeling to physics problems.[d] Some attempt to create approximate theories, calledeffective theories, because fully developed theories may be regarded as unsolvable ortoo complicated. Other theorists may try tounify, formalise, reinterpret or generalise extant theories, or create completely new ones altogether.[e] Sometimes the vision provided by pure mathematical systems can provide clues to how a physical system might be modeled;[f] e.g., the notion, due toRiemann and others, thatspace itself might be curved. Theoretical problems that need computational investigation are often the concern ofcomputational physics.

Theoretical advances may consist in setting aside old, incorrectparadigms (e.g.,aether theory of light propagation,caloric theory of heat, burning consisting of evolvingphlogiston, or astronomical bodiesrevolving around the Earth) or may be an alternative model that provides answers that are more accurate or that can be more widely applied. In the latter case, acorrespondence principle will be required to recover thepreviously known result.[7][8] Sometimes though, advances may proceed along different paths. For example, an essentially correct theory may need some conceptual or factual revisions;atomic theory, first postulated millennia ago (byseveral thinkers in Greece and India) and thetwo-fluid theory of electricity[9] are two cases in this point. However, an exception to all the above is thewave–particle duality, a theory combining aspects of different, opposing models via theBohr complementarity principle.

Relationship between mathematics and physics

Physical theories become accepted if they are able to make correct predictions and no (or few) incorrect ones. The theory should have, at least as a secondary objective, a certain economy and elegance (compare tomathematical beauty), a notion sometimes called "Occam's razor" after the 13th-century English philosopherWilliam of Occam (or Ockham), in which the simpler of two theories that describe the same matter just as adequately is preferred (but conceptual simplicity may mean mathematical complexity).[10] They are also more likely to be accepted if they connect a wide range of phenomena. Testing the consequences of a theory is part of thescientific method.[11]

Physical theories can be grouped into three categories:mainstream theories,proposed theories andfringe theories.[citation needed]

History

[edit]
Further information:History of physics

Theoretical physics began at least 2,300 years ago, under thepre-Socratic philosophy, and continued byPlato andAristotle, whose views held sway for a millennium. During the rise ofmedieval universities, the onlyacknowledged intellectual disciplines were the sevenliberal arts of theTrivium likegrammar,logic, andrhetoric and of theQuadrivium likearithmetic,geometry,music andastronomy. During theMiddle Ages andRenaissance, the concept ofexperimental science, thecounterpoint to theory, began with scholars such asIbn al-Haytham andFrancis Bacon. As theScientific Revolution gathered pace, the concepts ofmatter, energy, space, time andcausality slowly began to acquire the form we know today, and other sciences spun off from the rubric ofnatural philosophy. Thus began the modern era of theory with theCopernican paradigm shift in astronomy, soon followed byJohannes Kepler's expressions for planetary orbits, which summarized the meticulous observations ofTycho Brahe; the works of these men (alongside Galileo's) can perhaps be considered to constitute the Scientific Revolution.[citation needed]

The great push toward the modern concept of explanation started withGalileo Galilei, one of the fewphysicists who was both a consummate theoretician and a greatexperimentalist. Theanalytic geometry and mechanics ofRené Descartes were incorporated into thecalculus andmechanics ofIsaac Newton, another theoretician/experimentalist of the highest order, writingPrincipia Mathematica.[12] In it contained agrand synthesis of the work of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler; as well as Newton's theories of mechanics and gravitation, which held sway as worldviews until the early 20th century. Simultaneously, progress was also made in optics (in particular colour theory and the ancient science ofgeometrical optics), courtesy of Newton, Descartes and the DutchmenWillebrord Snell andChristiaan Huygens. In the 18th and 19th centuriesJoseph-Louis Lagrange,Leonhard Euler andWilliam Rowan Hamilton would extend the theory of classical mechanics considerably.[13] They picked up the interactive intertwining ofmathematics andphysics begun two millennia earlier by Pythagoras.[citation needed]

Among the great conceptual achievements of the 19th and 20th centuries were the consolidation of the idea ofenergy (as well as its global conservation) by the inclusion ofheat,electricity and magnetism, and thenlight.Lord Kelvin andWalther Nernst's discoveries of thelaws of thermodynamics, and more importantlyRudolf Clausius's introduction of the singular concept ofentropy, began to provide a macroscopic explanation for the properties of matter.Statistical mechanics (followed bystatistical physics andquantum statistical mechanics) emerged as an offshoot of thermodynamics late in the 19th century. Another important event in the 19th century wasJames Clerk Maxwell's discovery ofelectromagnetic theory,unifying the previously separate phenomena of electricity, magnetism and light.[citation needed]

The pillars ofmodern physics, and perhaps the most revolutionary theories in the history of physics, have beenrelativity theory, devised byAlbert Einstein, andquantum mechanics, founded byWerner Heisenberg,Max Born,Pascual Jordan, andErwin Schrödinger. Newtonian mechanics was subsumed under special relativity and Newton'sgravity was given akinematic explanation bygeneral relativity. Quantum mechanics led to an understanding ofblackbodyradiation (which indeed, was an original motivation for the theory) and of anomalies in thespecific heats ofsolids — and finally to an understanding of the internal structures ofatoms andmolecules. Quantum mechanics soon gave way to the formulation ofquantum field theory (QFT), begun in the late 1920s. In the aftermath ofWorld War II, more progress brought much renewed interest in QFT, which had since the early efforts, stagnated. The same period also saw fresh attacks on the problems ofsuperconductivity andphase transitions, as well as the first applications of QFT in the area of theoretical condensed matter. The 1960s and 70s saw the formulation of theStandard Model of particle physics using QFT and progress incondensed matter physics (theoreticalfoundations of superconductivity andcritical phenomena,among others), in parallel to the applications of relativity toproblems in astronomy andcosmology respectively.[citation needed]

All of these achievements depended on the theoretical physics as a moving force both to suggest experiments and to consolidate results — often by ingenious application of existing mathematics, or, as in the case of Descartes and Newton (withLeibniz), by inventing new mathematics.Fourier's studies of heat conduction led to a new branch of mathematics:infinite, orthogonal series.[14]

Modern theoretical physics attempts to unify theories and explain phenomena in further attempts to understand theUniverse, from thecosmological to theelementary particle scale. Where experimentation cannot be done, theoretical physics still tries to advance through the use of mathematical models.[citation needed]

Mainstream theories

[edit]

Mainstream theories (sometimes referred to ascentral theories) are the body of knowledge of both factual and scientific views and possess a usual scientific quality of the tests of repeatability, consistency with existing well-established science and experimentation. There do exist mainstream theories that are generally accepted theories based solely upon their effects explaining a wide variety of data, although the detection, explanation, and possible composition are subjects of debate.[citation needed]

Examples

[edit]

Proposed theories

[edit]

Theproposed theories of physics are usually relatively new theories which deal with the study of physics which include scientific approaches, means for determining the validity of models and new types of reasoning used to arrive at the theory. However, some proposed theories include theories that have been around for decades and have eluded methods of discovery and testing. Proposed theories can include fringe theories in the process of becoming established (and, sometimes, gaining wider acceptance). Proposed theories usually have not been tested. In addition to the theories like those listed below, there are also differentinterpretations of quantum mechanics, which may or may not be considered different theories since it is debatable whether they yield different predictions for physical experiments, even in principle. For example,AdS/CFT correspondence,Chern–Simons theory,graviton,magnetic monopole,string theory,theory of everything.[citation needed]

Fringe theories

[edit]

Fringe theories include any new area of scientific endeavor in the process of becoming established and some proposed theories. It can include speculative sciences. This includes physics fields and physical theories presented in accordance with known evidence, and a body of associated predictions have been made according to that theory.[citation needed]

Some fringe theories go on to become a widely accepted part of physics. Other fringe theories end up being disproven. Some fringe theories are a form ofprotoscience and others are a form ofpseudoscience. The falsification of the original theory sometimes leads to reformulation of the theory.[citation needed]

Examples

[edit]

Thought experiments vs real experiments

[edit]
Main article:Thought experiment

"Thought" experiments are situations created in one's mind, asking a question akin to "suppose you are in this situation, assuming such is true, what would follow?". They are usually created to investigate phenomena that are not readily experienced in every-day situations. Famous examples of such thought experiments areSchrödinger's cat, theEPR thought experiment,simple illustrations of time dilation, and so on. These usually lead to real experiments designed to verify that the conclusion (and therefore the assumptions) of the thought experiments are correct. The EPR thought experiment led to theBell inequalities, which were thentested to various degrees of rigor, leading to the acceptance of the current formulation ofquantum mechanics andprobabilism as aworking hypothesis.[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^There is some debate as to whether or not theoretical physics uses mathematics to build intuition and illustrativeness to extract physical insight (especially when normalexperience fails), rather than as a tool in formalizing theories. This links to the question of it using mathematics in a less formally rigorous, and more intuitive orheuristic way than, say,mathematical physics.
  2. ^Sometimes the word "theory" can be used ambiguously in this sense, not to describe scientific theories, but research (sub)fields and programmes. Examples: relativity theory, quantum field theory, string theory.
  3. ^The work ofJohann Balmer andJohannes Rydberg in spectroscopy, and thesemi-empirical mass formula of nuclear physics are good candidates for examples of this approach.
  4. ^ThePtolemaic andCopernican models of theSolar System, the Bohr model of hydrogen atoms andnuclear shell model are good candidates for examples of this approach.
  5. ^Arguably these are the most celebrated theories in physics: Newton's theory of gravitation, Einstein's theory of relativity and Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism share some of these attributes.
  6. ^This approach is often favoured by (pure) mathematicians and mathematical physicists.

References

[edit]
  1. ^van Dongen, Jeroen (2009)."On the role of the Michelson-Morley experiment: Einstein in Chicago".Archive for History of Exact Sciences.63 (6):655–663.arXiv:0908.1545.doi:10.1007/s00407-009-0050-5.
  2. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921". TheNobel Foundation. Retrieved2008-10-09.
  3. ^Theorems and TheoriesArchived 2014-08-19 at theWayback Machine, Sam Nelson.
  4. ^Mark C. Chu-Carroll, March 13, 2007:Theories, Theorems, Lemmas, and Corollaries. Good Math, Bad Math blog.
  5. ^Singiresu S. Rao (2007).Vibration of Continuous Systems (illustrated ed.).John Wiley & Sons. 5,12.ISBN 978-0471771715.ISBN 9780471771715
  6. ^Eli Maor (2007).The Pythagorean Theorem: A 4,000-year History (illustrated ed.).Princeton University Press. pp. 18–20.ISBN 978-0691125268.ISBN 9780691125268
  7. ^Bokulich, Alisa, "Bohr's Correspondence Principle", TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
  8. ^Enc. Britannica (1994), pg 844.
  9. ^Enc. Britannica (1994), pg 834.
  10. ^Simplicity in the Philosophy of Science (retrieved 19 Aug 2014),Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  11. ^Andersen, Hanne; Hepburn, Brian (2015-11-13)."Scientific Method".{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  12. ^See 'Correspondence of Isaac Newton, vol.2, 1676–1687' ed. H W Turnbull, Cambridge University Press 1960; at page 297, document #235, letter from Hooke to Newton dated 24 November 1679.
  13. ^Penrose, R (2004).The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape. p. 471.
  14. ^Penrose, R (2004). "9: Fourier decompositions and hyperfunctions".The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Physical Sciences.Encyclopædia Britannica (Macropaedia). Vol. 25 (15th ed.). 1994.
  • Duhem, Pierre.La théorie physique - Son objet, sa structure, (in French). 2nd edition - 1914. English translation:The physical theory - its purpose, its structure. Republished byJoseph Vrin philosophical bookstore (1981),ISBN 2711602214.
  • Feynman, et al.The Feynman Lectures on Physics (3 vol.). First edition: Addison–Wesley, (1964, 1966).
Bestselling three-volume textbook covering the span of physics. Reference for both (under)graduate student and professional researcher alike.
Famous series of books dealing with theoretical concepts in physics covering 10 volumes, translated into many languages and reprinted over many editions. Often known simply as "Landau and Lifschits" or "Landau-Lifschits" in the literature.
A set of lectures given in 1909 atColumbia University.
A series of lessons from a master educator of theoretical physicists.

External links

[edit]
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of:Introduction to Theoretical Physics
Structure
Concepts
Theories and disciplines
Subatomic
Spaces and objects
Particles
Processes, interactions
Spacetime
Mathematics
Classic physics
Other namespaces
Related
Divisions
Approaches
Classical
Modern
Interdisciplinary
Related
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Theoretical_physics&oldid=1318672498"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp