 | |
| Author | Pascal Bruckner |
|---|---|
| Language | French |
Publication date | 2006 |
| Publication place | France |
Published in English | 2010 |
The Tyranny of Guilt: An Essay on Western Masochism (French:La tyrannie de la pénitence. Essai sur le masochisme occidental) is a book byPascal Bruckner about the origin and political impact of the contemporary political culture of Western guilt. It was published in French in 2006 asLa Tyrannie de la Pénitence: Essai sur le Masochisme Occidental and in English in 2010.
Roger Kimball regardsTyranny of Guilt as a sequel to Bruckner's 1983 bookThe Tears of the White Man.[1]Richard Wolin preferred to describe it as a "pendant," a revisiting of the theme ofTears of the White Man.[2]
The 2010 translation into English was done by Steven Rendall.[3]
Bruckner acknowledges Western sins including racism and slavery, but points out that the west is also responsible for the creation of such things ascivil liberties, modern democratic government andabolitionism.[4][3][1] "There is no doubt," Bruckner writes, "that Europe has given birth to monsters, but at the same time it has given birth to theories that make it possible to understand and destroy these monsters."[4] The problem with the tyranny of guilt, according to Bruckner, is not the West is without sin, but that the Western culture of remorse is a disabling form of narcissism that makes it impossible to effectively criticize contemporary non-Western violations of human rights.[4]
Bruckner argues that the West has inadvertently collaborated withIslamists who seek to destroy Western liberal values and political freedom by focusing on western sins including slavery, imperialism, fascism, communism, thereby conceding the right ofIslamists to impose their standards on the Western countries to which they immigrate.Julia Pascal summarizes part of Bruckner's argument as an argument that "Europe has never recovered from its own barbarity and that now it seeks to cleanse its original sin with a new Eden; even if this Paradise has 70 waiting virgins."[3] The target of Bruckner's critique, writesBrendan Simms, is "an eagerness to apologize for the sins of colonialism and genocide and other Western crimes" that simplistically defines every Western state as a "penitant... never an innocent victim of terrorist attack but a deserving one: It has, after all, provoked the wrath of the oppressed, either at home or abroad."[4]
Douglas Murray describes Bruckner's characterization of the tyranny of guilt as a form of self-flagellation, a kind of moral intoxicant that "People imbibe because they like it... It lifts them up and exalts them."[5]
According to Bruckner, theIslamo-leftist pushing of the idea of the centrality of Western guilt in contemporary politics idea originated with theSocialist Workers Party (UK) goal of replacing traditional Communism with a worldwide movement to "spearhead a new insurrection in the name of the oppressed."[3] This ideal caught fire beginning in the 1960s, reinvigorating Western leftism with the idea that the United States and Israel are the great oppressors, and uniting the European Left, and theIslamic Republic of Iran in a world view according to which "the Jew has become the Nazi, the Palestinian the Jew and radical Islam is now the victim of Western democracy and not its executioner."[3]
Bruckner sees the beginnings of "sexualapartheid" in Europe in such things as the institution of separate hours for men and women at public swimming pools.[3]
