 Dust jacket used on both printings of the first edition. | |
| Author | James B. Allen andGlen M. Leonard |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints |
| Genre | Historical |
| Publisher | Deseret Book in collaboration with theLDS Church's Historical Dept. |
Publication date | July 1976[1] |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (Hardcover) |
| Pages | 722 pp |
| ISBN | 0-87747-594-6 |
| Followed by | 1992 2nd edition |
The Story of the Latter-day Saints is a single-volume history ofthe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) byJames B. Allen andGlen M. Leonard, first published in 1976.
The authors summarised the tone of their work by identifying four recurring themes that emerged throughoutThe Story of the Latter-day Saints:
Although seen as well written and comprehensive, the book was intended for a Latter-day Saint audience, because it detailed minutiae like organizational changes, but didn't focus on issues of interest to new readers on Mormonism.[3] Unlike most earlier Mormon histories, this book focused on casting the church in a broader context, addressed controversial historical issues, and covered the events of the twentieth century.[4]
The following list of the book's chapters also describe its historical scope:
In the 1992 second edition, the last chapter was changed to "Toward a Universal Church, 1974-1990".[5]
For over 50 years,Joseph Fielding Smith'sEssentials in Church History was issued as a popular single-volume history of the LDS Church. After Smith's death in 1972, LDS Church andDeseret Book officials asked the church's Historical Department to write a new single-volume history to replaceEssentials in Church History and cover more recent events, while using new sources available in the Church Archives. With theFirst Presidency's approval, the department assigned the project to Allen, anAssistant Church Historian, and Leonard, a Senior Historical Associate.The Story of the Latter-day Saints was published in 1976, the one-hundredth anniversary of Joseph Fielding Smith's birth.[6]
The book took a non-partisan, factually-sound approach toLDS Church history[7] and was the first time the entire history of Mormonism was professionally surveyed in one book.[8] It was also one of the first institutionally-sponsored publications to deal frankly with many controversial issues such as the complexities ofNauvoo, and the church's political, economic, social and doctrinal developments. Asprofessional historians, the authors cast their subject in its historic context, with connections made to largerRestoration and American movements. The product revealed the challenges and progress of thenew Mormon history in confronting controversy and reevaluating setting and tone.[9]
Anticipating high demand, Deseret Book prepared a very large first printing of 35,000.[10] It sold quickly with 10,000 copies in the first month, including 5,000 to the LDS Church's Public Communications department to place in U.S. libraries.[11] Nearly 20,000 copies sold in the first year[12] and the entire original printing was sold out within three years.[10]
The book was initially received favorably.[11] It was called a "significant" and "pathbreaking" history of Mormonism.[9][10] HistorianRichard Poll recommended it "to every serious student of Mormonism and every library interested in history, religion orAmericana."[7] Its extensivebibliography was also respected and seen as noteworthy.[9]
The book was commended for its modern scholarship and dispassionate tone while representing a faithful LDS perspective.[6] One review noted the authors' "remarkable blend of the scholarly approach and the religious story… They do not feel constrained tobear testimony, and yet they demonstrate empathy toward Mormonism that could only emanate from devoted members. It is a pleasant balance."[12]
However, this balance risked displeasing both religious and academic readers. Believers in the divinity of all church actions disliked seeing events cast against the influences in their historical setting. History purists wanted the discussion of more issues and problems and felt significant events and details were missing in this concentration of all Mormon history.[8] Allen and Leonard's history was praised and criticized by both Mormon and non-Mormon readers.[7]
In 1976, some members of theQuorum of the Twelve Apostles had concerns that the book wasn'tfaith-promoting. When they approachedquorum presidentEzra Taft Benson, he requested a thorough reading by his executive assistant.[11] This produced a critique that asserted the book wasn't spiritual enough to be a "true" LDS history and that the Historical Department's activities should be controlled.[13]
In a speech, Benson publicly worried the book may spiritually harm young church members. He condemned the portrayal of the Word of Wisdom health code and Joseph Smith's visions as being influenced by parallel movements in American history. Benson warned that the terms "experimental systems," "communal life," "primitivists," and "prophet alleged," were offensive and did not promote faith in the church.[14] He advised against purchasing work by "liberal sources," because it would "help sustain their cause."[15]
In a meeting with the First Presidency andChurch HistorianLeonard J. Arrington, Benson and ApostleMark E. Petersen argued the book was faith-damaging and should have presented more prophetic evidence. Arrington defended it but agreed to allow future department manuscripts to be reviewed by an Apostle before publication,[16] even though they alreadypassed through a reading committee of accomplished historians.[6]
While other church leaders agreed that the book was too "secular," several continued to support it, includingHoward W. Hunter andLDS Church PresidentSpencer W. Kimball.[17] Kimball felt it was a great work and was unhappy with "unchristian" treatment of Allen by some religion faculty atBrigham Young University (BYU) who were upset by it. Kimball thought Allen had performed honorably in this approved assignment, and "that Benson and Petersen did not have the authority or the right to interfere with the sale of the book."[15] However, such support remained private, to preserve the public unity of the Apostles.[18]
Despite its quick sell-out,The Story of the Latter-day Saints was not reprinted for years,[10][19] and some doubted it would ever be.[20] It was rumored to be uncitable in publications by Deseret Book and theChurch Educational System.[19]
The book fueled growing suspicion and disfavor with the Historical Department's activities, which led to the History Division's turning point. Plans were cancelled for a 16 volume comprehensive history series in honor of the church's sesquicentennial. Division staff was downsized, bureaucratized and eventually transferred to BYU,[21] where they could publish under academic rather than ecclesiastical sponsorship.
Eventually, a second printing was approved for 1986.[19] Later, Allen and Leonard prepared a revised and updated manuscript, which was published as a second edition in 1992. After the controversy dissipated, the book was still seen as an influential and notable accomplishment in its field. It is appreciated as respectful and faithful in its approach and "a model example of the new Mormon history ... It remains the best one-volume treatment of the Mormon past and the place where the beginning student of LDS history should turn first."[22] Curt Bench, a dealer in fine and rare Mormon books, listed it as one of the 50 most important Mormon books.[23]
The following are published reviews ofThe Story of the Latter-day Saints
