| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
I have removed the 'woodworkers' section. There is no indication that the woodworkers listed are more important or influential than the 90+ woodworkers in the category furniture makers, or the 100+ names in the luthiers category. I do not see how this template could accurately list the most influential names from such a large pool. There are probably other categories with similar overlap.Dialectric (talk)14:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Timber framing is a type of carpentry which has it's own article. Should it be added to this template? For that matter, Log cabin and Log house could be added or a new article which covers all kinds of log building techniques could be started and then added (there are many, ancient techniques and uses worldwide).--Jim Derby (talk)18:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, or even have its own dedicated template. Go for it,Jim Derby!HLHJ (talk)18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The entry for Linden/Lime/Basswood is under the softwoods. However they are deciduous dicotyledonous angiosperms and therefore hardwoods.MFdeS (talk)03:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I've always seen it as softwood due to it's characteristics, but I guess in scientiffic terms it's classed as a hardwood. Moved it to HardwoodsRaymond Holmoey (talk)20:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Forplum wood seethis linkPeter HornUser talk21:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Marquetry,parquetry,intarsia,purfling,binding (woodworking),edge banding, etc. seem like they need a category.HLHJ (talk)18:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Delete the following lines from 'occupations':