This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating toelections,electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visitour project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUnited States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
I didn’t include it because it’s already mentioned on the 2010 Senate elections page which is listed above. I request that it be removed.
Because it was a special election held on a different date to the main elections, I think the listing in the special row is correct.Number5716:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They can be added to the list of special elections too. I don't understand the logic behind omitting articles on special elections from the special election row. There is no-indication that it is limited to off-year special elections.Number5717:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this should be done, as per my points in the section above. I don't think this is unnecessary clutter.Number5711:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like the purpose of the section is to list elections that aren’t covered on other pages, while the Massachusetts special election is covered on another page.— Precedingunsigned comment added by209.23.249.111 (talk)20:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since the section heading was changed to "Odd-year special elections", please remove the 2010 Massachusetts election as it did not take place in an odd year.— Precedingunsigned comment added by73.110.217.186 (talk •contribs) 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment By definition, the 2010 Massachusetts special election should be removed from a row that is entitled "odd-year" elections, since 2010 is not an odd-year.--Goldsztajn (talk)00:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish aconsensus for this alterationbefore using the
.svg)
