| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
@Drdpw: Criteria 1 ("All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject"),3 4 ("There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template"), and 5 ("If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles") of WP:NAVBOX would still be satisfied by the inclusion of the links I added since MOS:SEEALSO provides that "One purpose of 'See also' links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics". Per WP:EDITCON and WP:REVEXP, you have provided no policy-based reasons for your revert in the edit summary so the links should be restored until you have provided one here. --CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk)17:43, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]