This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Buddhism This template falls within the scope ofWikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing withBuddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism Tibet This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofTibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet

This template needs some work. Everything is thrown in in a jumble. Let's think about adding some organization.Curious Blue (talk)23:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I'm just going to go straight ahead and edit.Aero13792468 (talk)20:23, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the criteria (if any) for a figure being included in the list of "key figures"? While there are many important figures there are many others who really don't match any sensible definition of that term - they are all jumbled together and the list grows ever longer. Perhaps on this page (or a sub page specifically for the purpose) people could cite a couple of reliable sources and give reasons why a figure should be on that list. Meanwhile I'm tempted to prune that list to a more manageable and useful size.Chris Fynn (talk)07:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Buddhism pages
• NA-importance Buddhism pages
• NA-Class Tibet pages
• NA-importance Tibet pages
• WikiProject Tibet articles