Template talk:Spider-Man in popular media
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Spider-Man in popular media template has television, film, theatre, actors, newspaper strip, theme park attractions, parodies, andvideo games. So the Spider-Man video games template is already a part of the in popular media template. Why keep them as separate templates?Spidey104contribs20:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I support it.-5- (talk)01:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Even with your grammatically horrible objection there is still a consensus of3 to one. Please stop reverting the edits. It is counter-productive and you can be blocked for edit warring. Thank you.Spidey104contribs13:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so this came up on my watchlist like it does every now and then, and it struck me that the title of this navbox is pretty lousy. Actually, it's very lousy, as comic booksare a popular medium, so the title is completely non1inficitive o content, and kinda implies that comics aren't popular. Now, this is clearly an "other media" template, meaning other than the character's original medium of comics, but I can see someone might find that a bit unclear as well. So I was thinking "Adaptations of Spider-Man" if we don't just want to have the template title match the article that is already linked in the header. (It's also anWP:EASTEREGG link, another strike against it.) The Fantastic Four and X-Men templates do say "other media" in their headers (and the similar templates for DC characters use "franchise media"), so this is the only template to use the "popular media" construction for a major comic character.oknazevad (talk)00:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
