Template talk:Solar eclipses
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Right now this navbox seems to be an exhaustive list of solar eclipses and is getting rather big. Someone just added all the eclipses in a between 1979 and 2030 making the box gigantic and full of red. I deleted all the redlinks (because they are not helpful for navigation, which is what this box is for, right?) but that's not really the solution.
I think we need to figure out what the point of this box is, right now it's so full of links it's hard to parse. I think there are too many eclipses listed, exhaustive lists are available in the list articles, this navbox ought to have "Notable eclipses", don't you guys think? Likewise, I think there are too many centuries individually listed. Why not have alists of solar eclipses by century and then have a link for, say 19th, 20th, 21st century eclipses? Cheers, — sligocki (talk)05:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: I've completed stub articles for events from 1950-2050, and linked here. I addedWikipedia:WikiProject_solar_eclipses to organize this work if anyone else is interested in helping.SockPuppetForTomruen (talk)23:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This enormity really needs to be split. I'm not against having multiple templates under the same header, but in one template it's just too much. --Anime Addict AA (talk)19:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the template linkSolareclipses? That makes no sense. SeeWP:SEAOFBLUE. I am changing. Feel free to revert.Eddie891TalkWork13:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 (talk)01:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
187.105.219.237 (talk)22:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It's not clearwhat exactly you want us to do. Please file a proper edit request with aclear reason next time you want something done.LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk)22:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]The template contains an error. The solar eclipse of 20 July 1944 was annular, not total, so it must belong to the section “Annular eclipses,” not “Total/hybrid eclipses.” —Jencie Nasino (talk)05:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This:Solar eclipse of May 12, 1706, Hi.-- Windino[Rec]20:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
| Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
The "upcoming eclipse" arrow marker has not been updated yet.130.85.226.154 (talk)23:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
