This template is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This template is within the scope of theAviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists ofopen tasks andtask forces. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUnited Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This template iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
Being as the Royal Air Force has had some of its major functions privatised (or operating under Private Finance Initiatives for long-term contracts), I suggest adding a new section for those civilian companies which provide such services to the RAF. The most obvious beingAirTanker Services (27 year contract to operate theRAF Voyager multi-role tanker transport),Babcock International (various elements of the elementary flying training and military flying training programmes), andSerco (engineering and support services). Thoughts please.Militum professio scriniarii (talk)18:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
