This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofJudaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Canonicity: Indeed, none of those items is part of the Western canon of scripture. But I understand that Ps.151 is in theSeptuagint, one of the foundation stones of the Western canon, and that it is accepted as canonical by churches in the East. (Analogously, Psalms 152-155 are found in some ancient translations of the O.T. scrolls.)
Consistency of the template: My original question was solely about consistency of those items in (and not in) the template, not about varying canonicity of the items. In that sense, my earlier question was deficient.
These aspects are linked, of course. So I should probably reformulate my question into two, to account for canonicity:
Consistency: Given that the template includes Psalms beyond the western-traditional 150, shouldn't it also includePsalms of Solomon? (Note: consistency.)
Canonicity: Given that the 150 have universal canonicity, whereas the other items don't, should we re-structure the template to reflect this? (See, for example, the 'Deuterocanon & Apocrypha' section ofTemplate:Books of the Bible?
