Template talk:Presidents of Argentina
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Should be reviewedKeNNy17:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is a mistake to call that the different sucession of democratic presidents "different republics". You have a different republic when you change the Constitution or Supreme Law (For example, France does have first, second, third, fourth and fifth different republics). Argentina has the same constitution since 1853 with some adjustements, but it has never been changed. It was supressed during the military dictatorships and restored in democratic governments. I think we have always had the same republic, not different ones.Aletano (talk)20:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They were democratically-elected presidents, they shouldnt be in the "First military dictatorship" section. Thats gotta be corrected.If there was fraud on its election is not known. Anyway, it is known that there was fraud in the elections of Roca, Juarez Celman, Figueroa Alcorta amongst others, yet they are not regarded as a "dictatorship".Aletano (talk)20:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Confederacion Argentina" bit should be revised.
| Pacto Federal: Governors of Buenos Aires (1829–1852) |
|  |
|---|---|---|
| National Organization –Argentine Republic (1853–1880) | ||
I think we should have a 1st paragraph ( named perhapsfirst governments 1810-1814 ) including :Primera Junta,Junta Grande,First Triumvirate (Argentina) andSecond Triumvirate (Argentina) --Jor70 (talk)10:42, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:76.91.189.163 points out that acting PresidentsRamón Puerta andEduardo Camaño should not be listed, although both of them did hold office per constitutional mechanisms of succession. If the rationale for this dropping is that they were not directly elected to the office, we then should drop from the list, as well:
So, what is the rationale? The time spent as Head of State? I don't think that is a valid criteria.
I will revert, and await for you comments on the subject.Salut, --IANVS (talk)04:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
