| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theOregon template. |
|
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months |
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Please discuss changing the color of the template here. Thanks.Katr67 (talk)17:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does anybody watch this page? Let's find out. I'm curious what people think about which articles on which to place this navbox. Personally I prefer to have it mainly on the pages that have links in the template, that is, counties and cities and a few selected topics. Why? Well, it makes little sense to me to have a box that is mainly geographic with a few very general topics on articles that are not geographic (counties and cities) or general. I'm a bit afraid of "box-creep". Other folks seem to think it's fine to add the box to a broader range of articles. Lately the tl was added to a bunch of Oregon-related list articles. I used to remove the box from articles on which I didn't think it belonged (like a minor community) but I won't be doing that anymore. I do, however, tend to like consistency, so perhaps we need ageneral guideline? I think it's also not a good idea to put the template on those state symbols of Oregon that are also topics of larger general appeal (Western Meadowlark,Coast Douglas-fir, etc.), as that seems a little, um, territorial or something, especially when the other states don't also have their navboxes there. God forbid the meadowlark end up with six state navboxes.* What do other folks think? Are these boxes helpful to our readers, or merely decorative andOregon-boosting?Katr67 (talk)20:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
*As an aside, I know aboutother stuff, but I see thatCategory:Symbols of Oregon wasdeleted while Montana, Kansas, North Dakota, Wyoming and Nebraska were not...in fact, ours was the only category that was deleted--perhaps we were too thorough in our categorization? I think it's time for an appeal or a mass Afd for the other 49 states (which would seem a bitpointy, I'm sure.)Katr67 (talk)20:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious why most cities that are part of a metro are not listed in this template. However, this is not true for all cities such asHillsboro, Oregon,Beaverton, Oregon andGresham, Oregon which are a part ofPortland metropolitan area. Should the cities (e.g.,Portland, Oregon) be added or Hillsboro, Beaverton and Gresham, etc. be removed? Similar arguments stand forPrineville, Oregon as a part ofBend-Redmond-Prineville, OR Combined Statistical Area andWoodburn, Oregon as a part ofSalem Metropolitan Statistical Area, etc. Thanks.50.126.125.240 (talk)18:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
In the second row ("Society"), addNative Americans.~2025-34234-24 (talk)16:07, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]