Template talk:Nissan
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theNissan template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I tried to get a basic layout down, originally based onTemplate:Ford. It needs to be expanded widely by someone more familiar with the Nissan models. There are a lot more atList of Nissan vehicles, among others.—Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 18:55, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
I noticed that the R89C and R390 GT1 are listed on this template, but I think, especially given that there are crapload more racing models besides these two, that racing models should be listed under a seperate category from the race cars.
I am planning on creating a Nissan timeline as well as this template, to match most other car company timelines. --Kuroki Mio 200621:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I addedNissan Leaf to the Concepts section; when the car begins production in 2010 it should definitely be moved to that grouping. Is there a convention for "planned production" cars? Feel free to move it to production whenever it seems appropriate.Nimur (talk)08:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Under Cars, shouldn't Leaf be listed after Latio and Maxima be after March?108.114.7.80 (talk)01:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Nissan portal wasrecently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template.BlackcurrantTea (talk)12:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
