Template talk:Marxism sidebar
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | The templateMarxist theory was merged here. The old talk page is archived atTemplate talk:Marxism/Marxist theory |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following were taken from the "See also" section of the Marx article, and may be appropriate candidates for inclusion here:
Skomorokh16:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed these sections from the philosophy sections as neither concept is present in the oeuvre of Marx and Engels, and both are expounded upon on thePhilosophy in the Soviet Union page, which is linked in the history section.RnRa76 (talk)01:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
this whole sidebar needs updating. for example, in the works section, there is only the works of marx and engels. it is generally agreed upon by marxists that this is not all of marxist canon. lenin, gramsci, althusser, benjamin, mao, adorno, among others all have classic works whihc should be included here. furthermore, the people section is lacking. in addition, the ideologies section is bloated. marxism has many varieties but to imply that every marxist leader has its own theoretical tradition is poor and clogs up the page. a re do is in order!Thatjakelad (talk)16:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I addedAlan Woods andAngela Davis to the "People" section".Asterix12 (talk)20:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@31.125.85.48, you both removed massive amounts of important pages (like dialectical materialism, Stalinism, Frankfurt School, Theses on Feuerbach) as well as adding tons of obscure books and people. It doesn't seem to be done in any sort of systematic way. Could you give an explanation?BappleBusiness[talk]19:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have overhauled the list of ideologies and theorists. The theorists are organised chronologically, and are people who are deemed to have contributed significantly to Marxist theory. The ideology section has been reorganised into Hegelian and non Hegelian, and both. Organised alphabetically and includes all major schools of Marxist thought. Those which are uncommon are in a separate area. I believe this is much better but to prevent an edit war I am explaining the overhaul and the reasons why. The main reason is that a lot of stuff was missing and the list had an anti Marxist slant in my opinion (including pol pot for example is just ridiculous and provocative). I have not removed Stalinism either, contrary to claimsSporadicmonk03 (talk)10:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
