Template talk:Lockheed Martin
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theLockheed Martin template. |
|
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This template was created as an effort inWikipedia Integration.Cwolfsheep17:56, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.... disclaimer; I am a contractor for LM, and I'm not advertising for these guys: I wanted to figure out what I knew & didn't know & link it all together in an efficient manner. Needless to say, the category has gotten far bigger than this template thanks to my research.Cwolfsheep22:31, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.... ending my contracting gig, and I'm not considering this an exercise inWikipedia Integration: the original intent still stands; I think the company is bigger than even its full-time employees take for granted. Some parts great, some parts questionable. Few firms achieve this level of complexity.Cwolfsheep12:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
LM no longer has any connection toInternational Launch Services. I'l remove the entry in the template. (sdsds -talk)02:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The bright blue colors in this template are hard on the eyes, and don't match any navboxes I've seen for other companies. Should we standardize with other templates? (See{{Raytheon Company}} among others). —TadgStirkland401(TadgTalk-Email)18:39, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done – I decided tobe bold and move ahead with several updates to the navbox. Reorganized it, added several entries, removed a couple... Let me know if there are questions or concerns. —TadgStirkland401(TadgTalk-Email)19:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
