Template talk:Jesus
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussingJesus and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:3 months  |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This template was considered fordeletion on2020 April 16. The result ofthe discussion was "do not merge". |
I'm removing "background: #edf3fe" because it is not visible. --Cantus 03:38, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
It is biased to refer to a figure in a religious system by a different religion's name for their god.Amgine 04:07, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Every reference made to anyone questioning the historical validity of Jesus is downplayed by saying they are a minority. There are many scholars that point to the fact there are hardly any historical references to Jesus Christ, and many of those few examples are highly questionable. It is clearly biased to count every Christian that says Jesus existed as a scholar, so any independent, non-Christian review of the facts is declared to be a tiny minority. The bias is clear, and it should be addressed to provide a fair reading for non-Christians.
—Precedingunsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
