This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects : Engineering This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Engineering , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofengineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Engineering Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering Template:WikiProject Engineering Engineering
I changed the numbering[ edit ] The template was grouped by
but I changed it to say
1 to 9999 10000 to 19999 20000+ It looks a little uglier but it is more correct.Jason Quinn (talk )20:13, 10 May 2010 (UTC) [ reply ]
There may be some merit in splitting the numbers up the same was as in theList of International Organization for Standardization standards article, for the sake of consistency, ie:1-999 1000-9999 10000-19999 20000-29999 30000-39999 40000+ (This doesn't match the article, which only has 80000) Mitch Ames (talk )04:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC) [ reply ] Adding ISO 21500 Guidance for Project Management[ edit ] I am writing several articles on project management as part of theASCE Body of Knowledge project ( or ASCE BoK) as well as the Project Management Institute Body of Knowledge project ( or PM BoK). ISO cites and parallels a lot of the materials.... Thanks ...
Risk Engineer (talk )17:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC) [ reply ]
Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2019[ edit ] Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.
Include ISO 26262 Standard in the list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_26262 )Cynosure1 (talk )23:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC) [ reply ]
Done –Jonesey95 (talk )07:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC) [ reply ] Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.
Can we get 14496-10 updated forWP:BRINT ? The article seems to have been renamed. It should link directly toAdvanced Video Coding (avoiding theH.264/MPEG-4 AVC redirect). Thank you.50.53.23.14 (talk )15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ]
Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 )22:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ] @1234qwer1234qwer4 : Thank you.50.53.23.14 (talk )23:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ] Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.
Can we get 23090-3 added? It should link toVersatile Video Coding . This can be seen atMPEG-I — MPEG . Thank you.50.53.23.14 (talk )15:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ]
The page you linked does not mention the standard, so I don't know if this should be done yet.𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 )22:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ] @1234qwer1234qwer4 : Well if you won't take that one how about this one which certainly means it is published ("Stage: 60.00 (Under publication)" as of 2021-01-20):https://www.iso.org/standard/73022.html 50.53.23.14 (talk )22:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ] Done 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠 )12:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC) [ reply ]