This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
Football This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofAssociation football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball

This template was considered fordeletion on2008 March 25. The result ofthe discussion was "no consensus".

This template was considered fordeletion on2008 January 15. The result ofthe discussion was "no consensus".

Why should G-14 template exist at all? It is not an achievement of some sorts to boast at the bottom of every team page. I stand for the template to be deleted.

Keep: The template here is to quickly link all the teams together for ease of naviagtion. If you read the G14 article you may want to jump from club to club.Niall12323:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The order in which the clubs appear in this template is a mess. It starts off alphabetically, but later on it is sorted by country. So Arsenal is second, while Liverpool and ManUnited appear much later, but still before Lyon. Same situation for Milan, seperated from Internazionale and Juventus, but still before Lyon. And if that is because it is Olympique Lyon, sorry, but PSV Eindhoven is then also in the wrong place. Somebody better make their mind up.Errabee18:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many templates on wikipedia nowadays. It seems so many are irrelevant, template cruft, though this has become something of a feature of wikipedia since i joined. Nobody actually wants to contribute useful information to the project, just show off their wiki-coding schools by adding useless crap, that can just about justify itself to the point of not being immediately deleted. This isnt myspace, if you want to show off coding skills go there! these templates are useless. Almost all templates found at the bottom of pages are far better off being categories, as they have no benefit as being a template, and simply clutter the articles. Thank you.Philc21:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SeeTemplate talk:Serie A.DJR(T)23:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that really relvant, that I said the same thing about other templates, I still think this one is irrelevant categories have their purpose, so we should use them instead.Philc12:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it relevant to maintain this template, there is no G14 anymore !Brio-En (talk)22:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class football pages
• NA-importance football pages
• WikiProject Football articles