| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theFerrari car timeline 1970s-1990s template. |
|
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
I added the overlap between the F355 and the 348. There are a lot of ways this template could be made more accurate...65.197.189.23416:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This timeline is for Ferrari road cars, however, the FXX is not a road car. Should we remove it? —Mr Grim Reaper(talk •contribs •email),22:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lack of consistency between this template and{{Ferrari road car timeline 1947-1968}}. Consider the models listed for 1968: this template lists 365 GTB/4 Daytona, 365GT and Dino 206 whereas{{Ferrari road car timeline 1947-1968}} lists 365 GTC, 275 GTB/4, 365 GTS and 365 GT.DH85868993 (talk)02:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TheFerrari California is listed as a RMR vehicle. It is actually a front-engine car.—Precedingunsigned comment added by84.217.1.135 (talk)14:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While there was only one P4/5 produced, theFerrari P4/5 is a legal road car and does not feature in this template.ManfromDelmonte (talk)22:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should the 599 GTO be placed in the "Supercar" category, or should it be regarded as a variant of the 599 GTB? Ferrari claims the GTO can lap the Nurburgring faster than the Enzo so I offer this up as a reason for placing it in the Supercar category.Grs1969 (talk)
The Testarossa and 512TR and F512M are evolutions of the Boxer and (with the exception of the M) were manufactured in greater quantities. I don't think splitting them into flat-12 and supercar flar-12 is appropriate. Does anyone else have a strong opinion? I wish the person who did the edits had a real login....Buzzm (talk)23:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Dino 206, Dino 246 GT and 246 GTS are listed in the V8 category, but each is a 6 cylinder, as evidenced by the third digit in their designators. The category should be renamed 'V6/V8'.— Precedingunsigned comment added byBuzzFlood (talk •contribs)13:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Noticed that the model calender is three years behind. Is anyone working on an update or is it ok if I try.BADpolizei (talk) , 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Where is it on this list? There's a few others that are missing too.— Precedingunsigned comment added by134.11.154.97 (talk)13:29, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, it was added.— Precedingunsigned comment added by134.11.154.97 (talk)13:32, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The 60s should be cut from this template, they are very well represented in the previous template and here due to restrictive categories cars are mashed up and some models even ommited.YBSOne (talk)13:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What models are omitted? —Cloverleaf II (talk)15:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]