Template talk:Employment
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I think it would be worth adding to the 'classifications' section of this template, a classification that matches with labour hire arrangements.
Labour hire arrangements are a situation where an employee isnot an independent contractor, but neither are they an employee of their place of work. Instead, they have an employment contract with a 3rd party (whether Hays, Adecco, etc). As they are not an independent contractor, employment laws still apply to them as if they are a regular full-time, part-time, or casual employee.
However labour hire arrangements are still meaningfully distinct from regular employment, as they create a legal shield between an employee and their place of work. For example, labour hire employees are often not covered by workplace-wide agreements, as they are ostensibly not employees of their worksite. (This is less the case in the united states, where there is a 4 stage legal test in place which often causes labor contractors to be covered by workplace agreements even if ostensibly employed by a 3rd party).
The term is referred to as 'labour hire' in Australia, 'labour brokerage' in south africa and Namibia, and sometimes as an 'employment agency' in the UK.
Thoughts?Jack4576 (talk)08:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have made the additionJack4576 (talk)14:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have added| state = {{{state}}} in an effort to allow editors to specify whether the box should be shown or hidden in an article.SeeTemplate:navbox/doc.Bwrs (talk)00:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After having to hunt for it, I moved Worker's Comp from attendance to health. WC was invented for when you got hurt at work & so you didn't have to sue the employer. Not about attendance really.Twang (talk)03:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
internship,when you look for the article reference inside the template you must found it in boldface, so you easy identify it, but here: it wasn't so.
and you can see thatintern is aredirection tointernship
ie.internship article, in this template, at its itemRoles:a link to a redirection (intern), so it was not visible in boldface instead the normal internal link. Because it'sinternship.
Conclusion: I think (in general way) is important not to hide the real link. And in this case it took consequences.
Summary: title of this section: I've changedinternship forinternship at the template. The aim: not to hide the real link, and avoid the consequence described above. Ciao!
--PLA y Grande Covián (talk)08:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 | Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
I was wondering ifRealistic job preview could be added to the See also section. Kind regards.2607:FEA8:E09D:C410:D1F7:FF40:4A6C:92E3 (talk)17:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done - I added it to the Hiring section, as it seemed more fit. Thank you and merry Christmas!ObserveOwl 🎄 (talk)01:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
