This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Hello. The division of Christian denominations between East and West is not international, does not include all continents (Wikipedia: Systemic bias) and gives the impression that denominations from such and such a region (East and West) are present only in such region (East and West). Which is wrong. The most common, inclusive international academic approach of all continents is:Catholicism,Orthodox Christianity andProtestantism. What do you think? --Nathan B2 (talk)22:31, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
After much debateCrusades has evolved into a MILHIST article that covers thepassagium generale whose objective was the recovery and defence of Jerusalem in theMiddle Ages, their legacy and aftermath.Crusading movement describes the development of instituitions of Crusading, described as a movement on the Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusade as well as elsewhere. The wider definition of the latter makes it a better fit for this template, either in addition to the link to the former or as a replacement. This was done underWP:BRD, reverted and now this opens the discussion.Norfolkbigfish (talk)09:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not really sure this is a rationale.Crusades has largely settled its scope on thepassagium generale to theHoly Land. Not really sure that the concept of aprimary article exists in WP for such a diverse subject—but it is unlikely to fit an article that is a sub-set of an enormous subject—but would stand to be corrected by someone who understood the principles better than me. The two articles are different, and I would argue that an article on the instituition of crusading was a more appropriate fit for this sidebar, although I can see an argument for including both. Maybe it is time for a wider discussion, rather than two editors disagreeing. What do you think?Norfolkbigfish (talk)09:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, @Srnec, although it doesn't seem quite as black and white as you suggest.Randy Kryn suggested the format of the edit that you have reverted himself.Mathglot has repeatedly revertedto the format of this edit which suggests he didn't object to it but his later edit suggests he has changed his mind. Not one to get overly vexed with now. Good to talk.Norfolkbigfish (talk)07:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A theological tendency may mean that Calvinism could transcend certain religious boundaries, but I think that Calvinism is generally distinct from other Protestant branches (such asLutheranism), and as such would probably best be placed as a separate branch.GuardianH (talk)09:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with User:Durziil89 that the template should be basic in the sense that it should include major topics related to Christianity, (such as theTrinity,Prayer andCreeds). It should not focus on one topic alone, in keeping with the templates of other religious traditions, much like that ofJudaism orIslam. That being said, I have restored the de facto denominational list that is a result of teamwork with User:Helper201 and me (with the addition of theOld Catholic Church). I hope this helps. With regards,AnupamTalk15:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we just need one link to Christian politics and readers can click on that link to find out more. The template doesn't need to list every single Christian political ideology that exists.Durziil89 (talk)15:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.
I propose that Gnosticism be added to the "Related Topics" tab. The Gnosticism template references early Christianity, so it is ideal for the inverse to be true as well.~2025-34190-10 (talk)14:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]