This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Astronomy:Astronomical objects /Constellations This template is within the scope ofWikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related toAstronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy This template is supported byWikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related toastronomical objects. This template is supported byConstellations task force.

I'm sure someone will think it strange how I spelled out some of the Latin letter names, or why I included them at all. The reason is to help disambiguate letters that look similar between Greek and Latin alphabets. This is meant to be seen at a glance and distinguished. The only other way I can think to do it would be to have separate sections for the different alphabets (and Flamsteed numbers), but that would completely break the established pattern with the other constellation templates.--Imzogelmo (talk)04:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this template also includeProxima Centauri, and maybe evenPrzybylski's Star? I'd add it/them myself, if i wasn't at a loss as towhere in the list it'd be the right place to do that... --Jokes Free4Me (talk)07:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, i went throughthe list, and found a couple of strange names:R Centauri andCentaurus X-3 (Krzeminski's Star) - they both look like they're already using a Bayer designation, but that's not included in the appropriate column within the list. Could someone clear up their statuses? TY. --Jokes Free4Me (talk)07:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Centaurus X-3" is not Bayer, and neither is "R Centauri". "R Centauri" is avariable star designation, whileCentaurus X-3 is the early form designations forX-ray sources.70.24.251.208 (talk)05:50, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proxima Centauri is neither a Bayer or a Flamsteed designation. However, Proxima does have a subsidiary Bayer designation...Alpha Centauri C ; Przybylski's Star doesn't seem to have a Bayer or Flamsteed designation, but it does have a variable star desgination,V816 Centauri --70.24.251.208 (talk)05:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why not. A comparable addition has been made to the{{Stars of Taurus}} template, which you could use as an example. The "R Centauri" is a variable star designation while the other is an X-ray source. They could be placed into an "Other" row. Regards,RJH (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
— atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

Ok, thanks for the explanations, 70.24.251.208. I included the stars using RJHall's idea, and mentioned V816 and Alpha C too. I hope everyone agrees the contents is now better. :) --Jokes Free4Me (talk)14:48, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a good idea to have a redirect atV816 Centauri/V816 Cen --70.24.251.208 (talk)04:20, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress onTemplate talk:Stars of Andromeda which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot05:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template-Class Astronomy pages
• NA-importance Astronomy pages
• Template-Class Astronomical objects pages
• Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
• Template-Class Constellations pages