Template talk:COVID-19 pandemic data/Netherlands medical cases chart
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I've createdWikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, --Another Believer(Talk)18:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The change in deaths should either be absolute or relative as having both bloats the chart (this is not a spreadsheet) and breaks the lines on mobile. I'll wait until a decision is made to convert the chart to the newest standard ('data' parameter).Alexiscoutinho (talk)04:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since mid March there is a discrepancy between Wikipedia and Hopkins for total number of cases in the Netherlands.Since end of July the deviation increases.
date;wikipedia;hopkins;deviation
2020-02-25;0;0;0
2020-03-03;24;24;0
2020-03-10;382;382;0
2020-03-17;1705;1711;6
2020-03-24;5560;5580;20
2020-03-31;12595;12667;72
2020-04-02;14697;14788;91
2020-04-09;21762;21903;141
2020-04-16;29214;29383;169
2020-04-23;35729;35921;192
2020-05-05;41087;41286;199
2020-05-12;42984;43183;199
2020-05-19;44249;44449;200
2020-05-26;45578;45780;202
2020-06-02;46647;46852;205
2020-06-09;47903;48109;206
2020-06-16;49087;49295;208
2020-06-23;49722;49930;208
2020-06-30;50273;50483;210
2020-07-07;50694;50907;213
2020-07-14;51146;51362;216
2020-07-21;52073;52307;234
2020-07-28;53374;53647;273
2020-08-04;55955;56279;324
2020-08-11;59973;60391;418
2020-08-18;63973;65560;1587
2020-08-25;67543;69683;2140
2020-09-01;71129;73802;2673
2020-09-08;76548;79792;3244;— Precedingunsigned comment added byUwappa (talk •contribs)06:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2020-09-15;84778;88763;3985
2020-09-22;98240;102844;4604;Uwappa (talk)07:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2020-09-29;117566;122620;5054;Uwappa (talk)05:58, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2020-10-06;144999;150413;5414;Uwappa (talk)06:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
2020-10-13;188876;194591;5715;Uwappa (talk)08:03, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hopkins numbers extracted fromhttps://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html -> NL -> chart Cumulative Cases
The Dutch RIVM should be reliable and is now the source for Wikipedia.Hopkins should be reliable too.So there should not be a deviation, certainly not one that increases rapidly.
The deviation is now too high to be the result of a later sampling time on same day as RIVM.
What should be the source for Wikipedia, RIVM or Hopkins?
.svg)
