| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| This template (Template:Asian topic) was considered fordeletion on2010 December 12. The result ofthe discussion was "Userfy". |
A centralised proposal regarding the use of superscript notes in navigation boxes is under discussion atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries. The disussion will affect this template.Nightw12:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why do the links go to articles for demonyms (most of which are redirects or disambiguation pages) instead of articles for the countries listed?Mr. Granger (talk)17:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As a cuisine topic, is it better to classify the pages according to the geographical or stylish context than to the degree of sovereignty of which the place the cuisine belongs to? A classification like Central Asian, East Asian, South Asian, West Asian, etc. sounds better to me.Speedyspeedo (talk)03:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A deletion discussion related to this template is underway atWikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 January 6#Template:Asian Cuisine.Ibadibam (talk)21:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So why is it red?
Philologick (talk)07:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to delete Egypt from this list, but there seem to be intricate details that interfered with my deletion of only the line for EG. - Maybe someone more knowledgeable can rectify this?Munfarid1 (talk)19:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The template called "literature Asian", for example at the end ofSyrian_literature, does not lead to this Asian country's literature, as it leads to "literature Syrian", which does not exist. The same seems to be true for all the other countries, listed in red. Can someone who knows how to do this fix the template? Thanks,Munfarid1 (talk)21:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]