Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was:Not Moved Consensus currently appears to be against the move.Alpha_Quadrant(talk)05:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arthurian Legend →Template:King Arthur and the Matter of Britain –

• Per title.86.40.105.236 (talk)00:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose I see no reason for renaming this. --76.65.130.165 (talk)02:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• That's its title. It was a technical request. --86.40.105.236 (talk)02:24, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Clarification. Templates have both a name and a title. The title is what displays in the title bar. The name is whatever the template is named, and can be really anything.Apteva (talk)02:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Is there a reason for the capital L? --86.40.105.236 (talk)02:32, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• No, but is it worth changing?Apteva (talk)04:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd argue that the term "Arthurian Legend" is so thoroughly lexicalized that we should treat it as a proper name. "Arthurian legend" by contrast looks awkwardly generic. --87.79.208.25 (talk)19:30, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggestion. Seems to me thatMatter of Britain is this template's first and foremost subject, so how about renaming it "Template:Matter of Britain"?CsDix (talk)21:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Except that it isn't, it's focused on Arthurian Legend, not the whole Matter of Britain. A "Matter of Britain" template would be a mostly different template, since it's missing content from the non-Arthurian parts. --76.65.130.165 (talk)03:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    In that case, I guess the proposal should be as originally requested.CsDix (talk)16:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Though this portion of the Matter of Britain is frequently called the Arthurian Legend --76.65.130.165 (talk)19:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    If so, thenTemplate:Arthurian legend would seem the name to choose.CsDix (talk)04:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't know if the phrase sounds more natural on the other side of the pond, but to me, "King Arthur and the Matter of Britain" sounds like a mildly interesting Harry Potter-esque Arthurian adventure. A move toTemplate:Arthurian legend would be prudent, at least. --BDD (talk)16:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose move to the unweildy "Harry Potter-esque" "King Arthur and the Matter of Britain";support move to "Arthurian legend" if need be.Cúchullain^t/c18:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose proposed move,per reasoning of76.65.130.165. While I do believe that "Arthurian Legend" is a proper name well established in the critical literature, I would not oppose the title "Arthurian legend". --Bejnar (talk)19:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in amove review. No further edits should be made to this section.