This tag is for placement after attributions to vague "authorities" such as "serious scholars", "historians say", "some researchers", "many scientists", and the like. For example:
Markup
Experts{{who}} agree...
Visual effect
Experts[who?] agree...
Please use the following format:{{Who|date=October 2025}}
Use it when no specific examples of identifiable individuals from that group are named who could be used to verify the statements or beliefs attributed to the group. Preferably, the offending statement should be made more specific by identifying particular individuals and then either cited or tagged for needing citation. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if the claim about the group is sufficiently vague as to be unsupportable.
Use good judgment when deciding whether greater specificity is actually in the best interests of the article. Words likesome ormost are not banned and can be useful and appropriate. If greater specificity would result in a tediouslaundry list of items with no real importance, then Wikipedia should remain concise, even if it means being vague. If the reliable sources are not specific—if the reliable sources say only "Some people..."—then Wikipedia must remain vague.
A template to tag attributions to vague "authorities" such as "serious scholars", "historians say", "some researchers", "many scientists", and the like.
