Sweet Sulphur Springs

Postcard of Sweet Sulphur Springs from about 1909
Created by
Katzrockso (
talk).Number of QPQs required:
0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Katzrockso (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC).
Katzrockso, thank you for a nice interesting article which is eligible: long enough, recent enough, well sourced. I even like the hook (which is rare)! I'd drop "once" because it sems to have been so for a while. - There are a few things in the article I'd do differently, - please tell me if you'd agree, - it's not required for DYK. I'd give it an infobox, - check similar articles and adapt from there perhaps. I'd move all references away from the lead to where the facts are mentioned in the body. I'd remove the links to small newspapers which won't get an article easily, and if not that, at least avoid to have two red links to the same one ;) - I also believe that the hook would be more attractive with that postcard image. Again, can you look at other nominations and see how that is done? If not, I can help you with it. Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)- Thanks for your replyGerda Arendt and your positive comments! I originally had some sources in the lead because I was still working on making sure that article was followingWP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY; I had some details in the lead that weren't mentioned in the body and there were sources that were only in the lead. I will double check that this issue has been resolved and remove the lead sources shortly. I will remove the redlinks, when I was adding the sources I didn't know these didn't have an article. As for an infobox, I am not sure that articles like this usually have them. There's one forIdylease Inn, though it doesn't have too much detail. I have never dealt with infoboxes before so I will try to see if I can mess around with it and see what works.
- As for changing the hook, I'm not sure. It thought it was important to highlight that it doesn't exist anymore - I don't think people really know about this historic hotel anymore, the most recent coverage on it is from the 1980s. As for the image, I'll have to take a look.Katzrockso (talk) 22:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, sounds all good, and you made great changes already, I'll watch. (I wrote about a spa place once,Kurhaus, Wiesbaden.) If you say "was" it should be clear that it's past, a postcard image would show the same, but for more clarity you could add "around 1900", better in someALT1. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the image! I moved the source further down, and added(depicted) to the hook. (Normally it's(pictured), but for paintings and such the other is better. For you next nom.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
The image is licensed and a good illustration of the period. - Please keep this nomination on your watchlist until it is closed and the hook moved to a prep. You can then watch that prep, and later the queue of the same number where it will land shortly before appearing. Theover-all queue has the calendar showing when it will appear. Looking forward to DYK day, and to your next offer here! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)