Technofeminism is a theoretical and practical framework that explores the intersections between technology,gender, and power. Rooted in feminist thought, it critically examines how technology shapes, reinforces, or disrupts gender inequalities and seeks to envision more equitable futures through technological design and use.
The term is widely attributed toJudy Wajcman, asociologist and feminist scholar. Wajcman introduced the concept in her influential 2004 book,TechnoFeminism.[1]
Historically, technofeminism is closely linked tocyberfeminism, a concept which emerged in the early 1990s. The origins of cyber- and technofeminism are strongly attributed to the references ofDonna Haraway'sA Cyborg Manifesto.[2] Since the 1990s, numerous feminist movements developed, addressing feminism and technology in various ways, and through different perspectives. Networks, ideas and concepts can overlap.
Technofeminism is often examined in conjunction withintersectionality, a term coined byKimberlé Crenshaw which analyzes the relationships among various identities, such asrace,socioeconomic status,sexuality, gender, and more.[3]
| Author | Judy Wajcman |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | Academic |
| Publisher | Polity Press |
Publication date | 2004 |
| Publication place | United Kingdom |
| Media type | Print (hardback &paperback),e-book) |
| Pages | 148 |
| ISBN | 0-7456-3043-X |
TechnoFeminism is a book by academic sociologist Judy Wajcman which reframes the relationship betweengender and technologies, and presents afeminist reading of the woman-machine relationship. It argues against a technocratic ideology, posing instead a thesis of society and technology being mutually constitutive. She supports this with examples of feminist history related to reproductive technologies and automation. It is considered a key contributor to the rise offeminist technoscience as a field.
Reception
According to a review in theAmerican Journal of Sociology, Wajcman convincingly argues that "analyses of everything from transit systems to pap smears must include a technofeminist awareness of men's and women's often different positions as designers, manufacturing operatives, salespersons, purchasers, profiteers, and embodied users of such technologies."[4]
In the journalScience, Technology and Human Values,Sally Wyatt notes that the "theoretical insights from feminist technoscience (can and should) be useful for empirical research as well as for political change and action" and that one way of moving towards this is "return to production and work as research sites because so much work in recent years has focused on consumption, identity, and representation."[5]
Editions
Adding to the print edition, which has been reprinted several times,E-book editions ofTechnoFeminism were released in 2013. The book has been translated into Spanish asEl Tecnofeminismo.[6]
Scholars, such asLori Beth De Hertogh,Liz Lane,Jessica Oulette, andAngela Haas, have spoken out about the lack of technofeminist scholarship, especially in the context of overarching technological research.[3]Caroline Bassett, Professor of Digital Humanities at the University of Cambridge, has also written on technofeminism and automation, highlighting its under-appreciated relevance to debates on artificial intelligence and digital culture.[7]
A primary concern of technofeminism is the relationship between historical and societal norms, and technology design and implementation.[8] Technofeminist scholars actively work to illuminate the often unnoticed inequities ingrained in systems and come up with solutions to combat them.[8] They also research how technology can be used for positive ends, especially formarginalized groups.[8]
Angela Haas focuses on technofeminism as a predecessor of "digital cultural rhetorics research", the focus of her scholarship.[8] The interactions between these two fields have led scholars to analyze the intersectional nature of technology, and how this intersectionality results in tools that do not serve all users.[8]
Haas also explores how marginalized groups interact with digital technologies. Specific areas analyzed include how revealing aspects of one's identity influences their ability to exist online.[8] Although at times digital spaces do not cater to marginalized groups, one example being the idea that someone who identifies as homosexual is perceived as "sexual in every situation", which alters how the online community they are a part of interacts with them.[8]
However, at times, technology can be renewed to serve women and marginalized groups.[8] Haas uses the example of the vibrator to prove this point.[8] While it is now associated with female empowerment, the tool was originally used to control women suffering from "hysteria".[8]
Lori Beth De Hertogh, Liz Lane, and Jessica Ouellette expanded upon previous scholars' work, placing it within the specific context of the "Computers and Composition" journal.[3] In their work, the scholars analyzed frequencies of the term "technofeminism/t" and associated words in the "Computers and Composition" journal.[3] Unfortunately, the occurrences were limited, leading the scholars to call for increased use of the term "technofeminism" in scholarly materials and increased intersectional frameworks in mainstream technology literature.[3]
Kerri Hauman explores technofeminist themes in her PhD dissertation, specifically discussing how feminism exists in digital spaces.[9] Using the example of "Feministing", a blog serving those invested in "feminist activism", Hauman applies various rhetorical frameworks (such as invitational rhetoric and rhetorical ecologies) to understand how online platforms can further social justice initiatives in some ways, but promote the exclusion of disadvantaged groups in others.[9]
.svg)
