TheTat people orTranscaucasian Persians (also:Tat,Parsi,Daghli,Lohijon) are anIranian people presently living withinAzerbaijan andRussia (mainly SouthernDagestan). The Tats are part of the indigenous peoples ofIranian origin in the Caucasus.[3][4][5]
As late as the turn of the 20th century, the Tat constituted about 11% of the population of the entire eastern half of Azerbaijan (seeBaku Governorate, the section on Demography). They formed nearly one-fifth (18.9%) of the population of theBaku province and over one-quarter (25.3%) of theKuba Province—both on theCaspian Sea. Either through misrepresentation, data manipulation, or simple assimilation, the Tat portion of the population of Azerbaijan has shrunk to insignificance, facing assimilation.
The 1886–1892 Tsarist population figures counted 124,683 Tats in the Russian Caucasus of which 118,165 were located in theBaku Governorate and 3,609 in theDagestan Oblast.[8] The1897 Russian Empire census recorded 95,056 Tats, of which 89,519 were in the Baku Governorate and 2,998 in the Dagestan Oblast.[8] The1926 Soviet census only counted 28,705 Tats of which 28,443 were in theAzerbaijan SSR and 1,237 in theDagestan ASSR.[8] Arthur Tsutsiev notes that a major portion of Tats in the 1926 census were listed under the categories "Persians" and "Azerbaijani Turks".[9] This was particularly the case within the Azerbaijan SSR, where some 38,327 individuals were recorded as "Turks whose native language is Tat".[10] The1979 Soviet census counted 22,441 Tats of which 8,848 were located in the Azerbaijan SSR and 7,437 in the Dagestan ASSR.[8]
There is little information about the permanent Persian population in South Caucasus since the Achaemenid period. Likely the ancestors of modern Tats settled in South Caucasus when theSassanid Empire from the 3rd to 7th centuries built cities and founded military garrisons to strengthen their positions in this region.[13]
Khosrow I (531–579) presented the title of regent ofShirvan in eastern South Caucasus to a close relative of his, who later became a progenitor of the firstShirvanshah dynasty (about 510 – 1538).[14]
After the region had been conquered byArabs (7th and 8th centuries)Islamization of the local population began.
Since the 11th centuryOghuz tribes, led bySeljuq dynasts started to penetrate into the region. The gradual formation of theAzeri people started. Apparently, in this period the TurkicexonymTat orTati, which designated settled farmers, was assigned to the South Caucasian dialect of the Persian language.[15]
TheMongols conquered South Caucasus in the 1230s and theIlkhanate state was founded in the 1250s. Mongol domination lasted until 1360–1370, but that did not stop prominent poets and scientists to emerge.
At the end of the 14th century, South Caucasus was invaded byTamerlane. By the end of the 15th century, the state ofShirvanshahs had obtained considerable power, its diplomatic and economic ties had become stronger. In the middle of the 16th century the state of Shirvanshahs was eliminated and South Caucasus joinedSafavid Iran almost completely.
In the late 18th century Russia actively started to contest the hegemony of Iran in the Caucasus. Following theRusso-Persian Wars of1804-1813 and1826-1828 and the respectively resulting treaties ofGulistan andTurkmenchay, Russia gained most of the South Caucasus and parts of theNorth Caucasus fromQajar Iran.[16] After that there is data about quantity and settling of the Tats, collected by tsarist authorities. When the city ofBaku was occupied in the beginning of the 19th century during the Russo-Persian War (1804–1813), the whole population of the city (about 8,000 people) were Tats.[17]
Russia more or less openly pursued a policy to free their newly conquered land from Iran's influence. By doing this, the Russian government helped to create and spread a new Turkic identity that, in contrast to the previous one, was founded on secular principles, particularly the shared language. As a result, many Iranian-speaking residents of the future Azerbaijan Republic at the time either started hiding their Iranian ancestry or underwent progressive assimilation. The Tats and Kurds underwent these integration processes particularly quickly.[18]
“There are eight villages in Tabarsaran which are: Jalqan, Rukan, Maqatir, Kamakh, Ridiyan, Homeydi, Mata'i, and Bilhadi. They are in the environs of a city that Anushiravan built near the wall of Darband. Its remains are still there. They speak the Tat language, which is one of the languages of Old Persia. It is clear that they are from the people of Fars and after its destruction, they settled in those villages. ..The districts situated between the two cities of Shamakhi and Qodyal, which is now the city of Qobbeh, include Howz, Lahej, and Qoshunlu in Shirvan and Barmak, Sheshpareh and the lower part of Boduq in Qobbeh, and all the country of Baku, except six villages of Turkmen, speak Tat. it becomes apparent from this that they originate from Fars.“
— Abbas Qoli Aqa Bakikhanov, "The Heavenly Rose-Garden: A History of Shirvan & Daghestan"[20]
According to the 1894 publication of theCaucasian Calendar, there were 124,693 Tats in the Caucasus,[21] however, due to the gradual spread of the Azerbaijani language, Tati was falling out of use. During the Soviet period, after the official termAzerbaijani had been introduced in the late 1930s, the ethnic self-consciousness of Tats changed greatly and many started to call themselves Azerbaijani. Whereas in 1926 about 28,443 Tats had been counted,[22] in 1989 only 10,239 people recognized themselves as such.[23]
In 2005 American researchers carried out investigations in several villages ofGuba,Devechi,Khizi,Siyazan,Ismailli andShemakha districts of the Republic of Azerbaijan, indicating 15,553 Tats in these villages.[24]
Although the majority of the Tat population of Azerbaijan and southern Dagestan uses the Turkic exonymTati orTat as a self-designation, there remain some local self-designations:[25]
Parsi—The termParsi has been used until the present day by the Tats ofAbsheron as self-designation andzuvan Parsi as an indication of Tat language. This term relates toPārsīk, theMiddle Persian self-designation of Persians, cf. Middle PersianPārsīk ut Pahlavīk – Persian and Parthian. During theNew Persian language period the final consonant was lost and the ethnonym becamePārsī. Some groups of Persian-speaking populations in Afghanistan and the Zoroastrians of India (theParsis) also use the termParsi as a self-designation.
Lohijon—The citizens of the Tat settlementLahij in the Ismailli district name themselves after their villageLohuj, pluralLohijon. Lahij is the largest Tat village (about 10.000). Its isolation has prevented the local population from contacts with the outside world which has led to their own isolated self-designation. A small community of the Lohijon, descendants of the 1910–20s migrants from Lahij, live in the village of Gombori inKakheti, in the east of Georgia. They are registered as Azerbaijanis and speak Azerbaijani as their primary language.[26] As of 2020, there are only about 150 them left.[27]
Daghli—The Tats in Khizi district and parts of Devechi and Siyazan districts use another Turkic exonym,Daghli (mountaineers) for themselves. As a result of the spread of Azeri Turkic the termDaghli has strongly come into use and the local Tats started to use it themselves.
On December 14, 1990, theAzeri cultural and educational society for studying and development of Tati language, history, and ethnography was founded by the board of the Ministry of Justice of theAzerbaijan SSR. A primer and textbook of the Tat language together with literary and folklore pieces were published.
The Persian settlers of the South Caucasus have long interacted with the surrounding ethnic groups, exchanging elements of their cultures. Arts likecarpet-making, hand-weaving, metal manufacture,embossing andincrustation are highly developed. The arts of ornamental design and miniature are also very popular.[28]
There is a rich tradition of Tat spoken folk art. Genres of national poetry likeruba’is,ghazals,bayts are highly developed. While studying the works of Persian medieval poets of South Caucasus likeKhaqani andNizami Ganjavi some distinctive features of the Tat language have been revealed.[29]
As a result of the long co-existence of Tats and Azerbaijanis, many common features in farming, housekeeping, and culture have developed. Traditional Tat female clothes are a long shirt, wide trousers worn outside, a slim line dress, outer unbuttoned dress, headscarf, and "Moroccan" stockings. Male clothes are theCircassian coat and high fur-cap.
The traditional one or two-storeyed houses made of rectangularlimestone blocks or river shingles and also have blank walls facing the street. The roof is flat with an opening for a stone fireplace chimney. The upper floor is used for habitation and living areas where the family gets together (kitchen etc.) were situated on the ground floor. Typically one of the living room walls has several niches for the storage of clothes, bed linens, and sometimes crockery. Rooms were illuminated by lamps or by a skylight through an opening in the roof. House furniture consisted of low couches, carpeted floors, and mattresses. Fireplaces,braziers, and ovens were used for heating the home in winter and cooking year-round.
The property usually has a walled or fenced in yard and almost always has a garden. There is averanda (eyvan), a paved drain or a small basin (tənu), covered cattle-pan,stable and hen-house.
The Tat language was widely spread in Eastern South Caucasus. Up to the 20th century it was also used by non-Muslim groups:Mountain Jews, part of theArmenians and theUdins.[31] This has led some to the idea that Muslim Tats, Tat-speakingMountain Jews, and Tat-speaking Christian Armenians are one nation, practicing three different religions.
The "Mountain Jews" belong to the community of Persian-speaking Jews. Some groups of this community live in Iran, Israel (especially), North America (especially), and Europe. The Jews of North Caucasus and modern day Azerbaijan were classified "Mountain Jews" only in 19th-century official Russian documentation. The Mountain Jews call themselvesJuhuro, which means "Jews".
In the year 1888 A. Sh. Anisimov showed the closeness of the language of the Mountain Jews and the Tats. In his workCaucasian Jews-Mountaineers he came to the conclusion that the Mountain Jews were representatives of the Iranian family of the Tats, which had adopted Judaism in Iran and later moved to the South Caucasus. The ideas of Anisimov were supported during the Soviet period: the popularization of the idea of the Mountain Jews' Tat origin started in the 1930s. Through the efforts of several Mountain Jews, closely connected with the regime, the idea of mountain Jews being not really Jews at all but Judaized Tats became widely spread. Some Mountain Jews started to register themselves as Tats because of secret pressure from the authorities.
As a result of this, the words Tat and Mountain Jew became almost synonymous. The term "Tat" was used in research literature as the second or even first name for Mountain Jews. This caused the whole cultural heritage (literature, theatre, music) created by Mountain Jews during the Soviet period to be attributed to the Tats.
Comparing physic-anthropological characteristics of Tats and Mountain Jews together with information about their languages suggests no signs of ethnic unity between these two nations.
Like most "Jewish" languages, the grammatical structure ofJuhuri retains archaic features of the language it is derived from. At the same time all of these languages are satiated withHebrew words. The loanwords fromAramaic and Hebrew in Juhuri include words not directly connected with Judaic rituals (e.g.zoft resin,nokumi envy,ghuf body,keton linen, etc.) Some syntactical features that Juhuri has are ones typical for Hebrew.
The physical-anthropological types of Tats and Mountain Jews are also dissimilar.
In 1913 the anthropologist K.M. Kurdov carried out measurements of a large group of Tat population of Lahij village and revealed fundamental differences[32] of their physical-anthropological type from the Mountain Jews. Measurements of Tats and Mountain Jews were also made by some other researchers.[33]Cephalic index measurements have shown that, while for Tatsmesocephalia anddolichocephalia are typical, extremebrachycephalia is typical for Mountain Jews.Dermatoglyphic characteristics of the Tats and Mountain Jews also exclude ethnic similarity. In 2012 a uniparentalgenetic markers comparison between Judeo-Tat dialect and Muslim-Tat dialect speakers in Dagestan found independent demographic histories.[34]
Speakers of Mountain-Jew dialect and Tati language are representatives of two different nations, each with its own religion, ethnic consciousness, self-designation, way of life, material and spiritual values.[35]
Some 19th- and 20th-century publications describe the citizens of several Tat-speaking village of South Caucasus asArmenian Tats,Armeno-Tats,Christian Tats orGregorian Tats. It was suggested that a part of the Persians of Eastern South Caucasus had adoptedArmenian Christianity, but this did not take into consideration the fact that those citizens identify themselves as Armenians, because conversion to religion is strongly attached to ethnic identity in eastern cultures.[36]
There are traces of an Armenian phonological, lexical, grammatical, and calque substratum in the dialect of Tat-speaking Armenians. There are also Armenian affricates (ծ, ց, ձ) in words of Iranian origin, which do not exist in the Tat language. This can only be explained by Armenian influence.
Although they have lost their language these Armenians managed to preserve their national identity. It has a distinct "us versus them" dichotomy, "Hay" (us) to "Muslims" (Tats and Azeri together).
Starting from the Middle Ages, the termTati was used not only for the Caucasus but also for northern Iran, where it was extended to almost all of the local Iranian languages except Persian andKurdish.
Currently the termTati andTati language is used to refer to a particular group of north-western Iranian dialects (Chali, Danesfani, Hiaraji, Hoznini, Esfarvarini, Takestani, Sagzabadi, Ebrahimabadi, Eshtehardi, Hoini, Kajali, Shahroudi, Harzani) inIranian Azerbaijan, as well as south of it in the provinces ofQazvin andZanjan.[37] These dialects have a certain affinity to theTalysh language as one of the descendants of theOld Azari language.[38]
^H. Pilkington,"Islam in Post-Soviet Russia", Psychology Press, Nov 27, 2002 . pg 27:"Among other indigenous peoples of Iranian origin were the Tats, the Talishes and the Kurds"[1]
^R. Khanam,"Encyclopaedic Ethnography of Middle-East and Central Asia:P-Z, Volume 1", Global Vision Publishing Ho, 2005. pg 746:"The contemporary Tats are the descendants of an Iranian-speaking population sent out of Persia by the dynasty of the Sasanids in the fifth to sixth centuries."
^T. M. Masti︠u︡gina, Lev Perepelkin, Vitaliĭ Vi͡a︡cheslavovich Naumkin, "An Ethnic History of Russia: Pre-Revolutionary Times to the Present", Greenwood Publishing Group, 1996. pg 80:"The Iranian Peoples (Ossetians, Tajiks, Tats, Mountain Judaists)"[2]
^Gruenberg, Alexander. (1966). "Tatskij jazyk". In: Vinogradov, V. V. (ed.),Jazyki narodov SSSR. Volume 1: Indoevropejskie jazyki, 281-301. Excerpt: "The Tat language belongs to the Southwest group of Iranian languages and is close in its grammatical structure and lexical content to the Persian and Tajik languages."
^Authier, Gilles (2012).Grammaire juhuri, ou judéo-tat, langue iranienne des Juifs du Caucase de l'est. Wiesbaden: Reichert. Excerpt: "Judaeo-Tat has no particular affinity with the Persian varieties, spoken until recently by Jews of Bukhara, Yazd, Isfahan, Kerman, Hamadan, Kashan, and Nahavand. Contrary to these, Judaeo-Tat is a different language that is not intelligible with Standard Persian;",
^abcdTsutsiev, Arthur. "Appendix 3: Ethnic Composition of the Caucasus: Historical Population Statistics". Atlas of the Ethno-Political History of the Caucasus, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014, p. 180.
^Tsutsiev, Arthur. "Appendix 3: Ethnic Composition of the Caucasus: Historical Population Statistics". Atlas of the Ethno-Political History of the Caucasus, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014, p. 189 (note 34).
^Tsutsiev, Arthur. "Appendix 3: Ethnic Composition of the Caucasus: Historical Population Statistics". Atlas of the Ethno-Political History of the Caucasus, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014, p. 189 (note 34).
^Yunusov A. S. Azərbaycanda Islam (in Azeri Turkic); This is an official result of the first census of the population of Baku, gained by tsarist authorities
^Gulistan-i Iram / ʻAbbāsqulī Āqā Bakikhānūf ; matn-i ʻilm – intiqādī bi-saʻy va ihtimam: ʻAbd al-Karīm ʻAlī-zādah [va dīgarān], Bākku : Idārah-ʾi intishārāt-i "ʻIlm", 1970. Original Persian: درصفحه 18 كتاب مذكور آمده است: هشت قريه در طبرسران كه جلقان و روكال و مقاطير و كماخ و زيديان و حميدي و مطاعي و بيلحدي باشد، در حوالي شهري كه انوشيروان در محل متصل به دربند تعمير كرده بود و آثار آن هنوز معلوم است، زبان تات دارند. ايضا" در صفحه 19 كتاب ياد شده آمده است: محالات واقع در ميان بلوكينشماخي و قديال كه حالا شهر قبه است، مثل حوض و لاهج و قشونلو در شيروان و برمك و شش پاره و پايين بدوق در قبه و تمام مملكت باكو سواي شش قريه ي تراكمه، همينزبان تات را دارند... قسم قربي مملكت قبه سواي قريه ي خنالق كه رباني عليحده دارد و ناحيه ي سموريه و كوره دو محال طبرسران كه دره و احمدلو ميباشند به اصطلاحاتمنطقه، زبان مخصوص دارند و اهالي ترك زبان را مغول مينامند .
^Willem Floor, Hasan Javadi(2009), "The Heavenly Rose-Garden: A History of Shirvan & Daghestan by Abbas Qoli Aqa Bakikhanov, Mage Publishers, 2009. page 18
^Кавказский календарь на 1894 год [Caucasian calendar for 1894] (in Russian) (49th ed.). Tiflis: Tipografiya kantselyarii Ye.I.V. na Kavkaze, kazenny dom. 1894.
^Cephalic index average value for the Tats of The Republic of Azerbaijan differs from 77,13 to 79,21, for Mountain Jews of Daghestan and The Republic of Azerbaijan – form 86,1 до 87,433.
Ter-Abrahamian, Hrant (2005). "On the Formation of the National Identity of the Talishis in Azerbaijan Republic".Iran and the Caucasus.9 (1). Brill:121–144.doi:10.1163/1573384054068132.
Tonoyan, Artyom (2019). "On the Caucasian Persian (Tat) Lexical Substratum in the Baku Dialect of Azerbaijani. Preliminary Notes".Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft.169 (2):367–378.doi:10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.169.2.0367.S2CID211660063.