 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(July 2016) |
| Tanda Putera | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Shuhaimi Baba |
| Written by |
|
| Screenplay by | Shuhaimi Baba |
| Story by |
|
| Based on | 1969 racial riots |
| Produced by |
|
| Starring |
|
| Cinematography | Filus Ghazali |
| Edited by | H. W. Kuang |
| Music by | Sharon Paul |
Production company | Pesona Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 115 minutes |
| Country | Malaysia |
| Language | Malay |
| Budget | MYR 4 million |
| Box office | MYR 0.93 million[1] |
Tanda Putera (English:The Mark of a Prince) is a 2013MalaysianMalay-languagehistoricalpolitical drama film directed byShuhaimi Baba. The film chronicles the relationship betweenTun Abdul Razak, who was the second Malaysian Prime Minister, and his then deputyTun Dr Ismail set around the time after the1969 racial riots. The film was intended to be released inMalaysian cinemas on 13 September 2012 but the release was delayed until 29 August 2013[2] due to some controversy regarding the portrayal of the racial riots being the plot point of the film. It isShuhaimi Baba's sequel film to1957: Hati Malaya in 2007.
The film is a fiction loosely based from the race riots of 1969, when the racial tension had reached its height.[3] The film portrays the close friendship between the second Malaysian prime minister,Tun Abdul Razak and his deputy, Tun Dr Ismail. They were secretive about their health problems as they had the task of restoring the peace in their country following the events of 13 May 1969. Tun Razak was suffering from leukaemia and he had to keep it a secret from his family, so they both sought the services of Dr. Macpherson, who used his reading room as a secret clinic for his treatment.
Shuhaimi Baba had stated that the film is based on true historical facts and that it is not a propaganda and that the film is mainly about the friendship between Tun Razak and Tun Dr Ismail, while the 13 May incident is merely a backdrop to the film. However, Shuhaimi also mentioned that there were significant amounts of creative illustration and fictional content added in.[4][5]
Aidil Rusli writing forThe Star calls the film "an engaging experience"[6] despite its "niggling faults" - its approach to an episodic narrative "having to cram everything into a two-hour movie", and "less-than-believable"CGI shots to illustrate the period the film was set in.[6]
Umapagan Ampikaipakan, of radio stationBFM 89.9, on the review website UmaandJoe.com says that the film glorified Abdul Razak and Dr Ismail at the expense of their predecessorTunku Abdul Rahman; that it had "made Tunku look like a blithering fool. It made him look toothless. [...] when you tell the story, you don’t undermine another leader. You don’t sayBill Clinton was great butJFK was a loser.”[7][8] His co-host Johanan Sen observed on the production aspect of the film where its first half "looks like an unfinishedHistory Channel special without voiceovers done or without any proper historians being interviewed. [...] ...a re-enactment footage arranged together without proper narrative."[7][8]
Erna Mahyuni ofMalay Mail, in a scathing commentary of the film that was widely circulated online, also stated of its seemingly lacking of a coherent narrative; with the ensemble cast's performance having "the collective expressiveness ofIKEA furniture". The performance of lead actor Rusdi Ramli in particular was derided for his "unconvincing" expressions and "forced" chemistry with co-actor Zizan Nin, the latter aspect coming across as "a parody ofbromance".[9] Erni further wrote that the movie appeared to havenegationist undertones against the 1969 riots and it negatively portrayed the two statesmen protagonists "as pompous idiots who do not trust their wives".[9]
There was also some common ground regarding how the central characters of Abdul Razak and Ismail, and their wives had been miscast by more younger actors.[6][9]
The movie failed to collect back its budget, affected by the Penang screening ban and intense competition with other international movies that were also showing in cinemas at the time such asKick-Ass 2 andThe Mortal Instruments: City of Bones. In addition, another local movie that was released at about the same time titledKL Zombi surpassed it and the aforementioned international films to hit second place in opening weekend takings between 29 August and 4 September alone, with onlyElysium beating it at first place.[10]
Before the release of the film, it sparked controversies about the accuracy of its contents after the release of the trailer in relation to the 13 May riots. Opposition lawmakers alleged that the film portrayed the Chinese and theDemocratic Action Party (DAP) in a negative light.[11] Further controversy was caused after there were allegations that the film's official Facebook page featured a picture of opposition lawmakerLim Kit Siang being carried away by a group of uniformed officials with captions claiming that Lim had urinated on theSelangor flag in the house of former Selangor chief ministerHarun Idris. Lim denied the allegation in response and said that the picture featuring him in the Facebook page was actually taken inSabah in 1984. The director Shuhaimi Baba also denied that Lim was to be featured in the film.[12]
On 28 August 2013, thePenang state government had sent out advisory directives[13] to all cinema operators in the state to not screen the movie. Chief MinisterLim Guan Eng had claimed that there are slanderous scenes that could provoke racial hatred.[14] However, less than 24 hours after the directives were issued on 29 August, the state government issued another contradictory letter stating they were merely "advised" against screening it, instead of otherwise banning it. Cinemas in Penang eventually screened the movie despite the state government's advisory. Communications and Multimedia MinisterAhmad Shabery Cheek said the movie would reach cinemas in Penang starting 31 August 2013.[15]
