This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Rugby leagueHigh‑importance Wakefield Trinity is within the scope ofWikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage ofrugby league football related articles.Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale. YorkshireMid‑importance Wakefield Trinity is within the scope ofWikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide toYorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit theproject page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project'stalk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

How notable are some of these players when there are not even first names shown with them. A notable player is one that everyone (both supporters of the club and wider supporters of the game) should instantly recognise.

These lists just come across as lists of players - they should be trimmed down or moved off to their own page - it would make the article far better.—Precedingunsigned comment added by77.102.17.150 (talk)15:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once notable, always notable. Whilst I am not convinced by the value of such lists, I don't think the fact that people wouldn't instantly recognise a name from the past as evidence that they were not significant in their own era.GordyB (talk)15:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But Gordy, the trouble is that these lists - whether you accept the player is notable or not, are incomplete. It gives the article a half finished quality that it doesn't deserve. It would be better to either delete the names which are incomplete and/or move the lists to its own page - as you see with other teams in other sports.

It just strikes me that someone sat around and thought of a list of names, some notable by any method, some just not. For example Christopher "Chris" Perry (#1/#6) circa-1990 - OK player, not notable by any stretch of the imagination and with no link to any Wikipedia page or other WWW site, it just doesn't have a meaningful presence.—Precedingunsigned comment added by77.102.17.150 (talk)23:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This list is so ridiculously massive it makes you wonder if there has ever been a Trinity player who isn't notable! I'm going to remove the lot and replace with a link toCategory:Wakefield Trinity Wildcats rugby league players.Dancarney (talk)15:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to "How notable are some of these players when there are not even first names shown with them"… for most of the 20th century it was customary to show only the players’ surnames in matchday programmes, only being suffixed by the first letter of the forename if there were two players with the same surname, but this didn’t prevent these players from winning the Challenge Cup or international caps.

Perhaps the ‘Players earning International Caps while at Wakefield Trinity’, ‘Challenge Cup & Championship Winning Players’, and ‘Other Notable Players…’ sections should be moved to be sections of a separate ‘List of Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Players’. Then the Wakefield Trinity Wildcats wouldn’t have “a half finished quality”.

The problem with deleting everything is that along with other red links, Challenge Cup winners and internationals such as; ‘W. J. D. Howes (#12) (1946 Challenge Cup Winner), won caps for Wales while at Wakefield 1948/49, 1949/50 ?-Caps, won caps for British Empire XIII while at Wakefield 1947/48 France’ and ‘Robert "Bob" Kelly [6] (Ireland) (#10/#11), won caps for Other Nations while at Wakefield 1955 England, France, won caps for Great Britain while at Wakefield 1955-56? France’ are completely obliterated. I do intend to create articles for these players but up until 6-months ago, there wasn’t even an article forDerek Turner.DynamoDegsy (talk)14:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that your suggestion of a separate page entitled something likeList of Wakefield Trinity Wildcats players would be the best solution. This kind of approach has been used for plenty of association football clubs - seeList of Gillingham F.C. players, which reachedfeatured article status.Dancarney (talk)21:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely cut & paste to a list-article instead of completely expunging all that work from existence. I've already done the same with theGreat Britain national rugby league team's list.--Jeff79 (talk)18:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attention: Wakefield Trinity article contributors!! I'm currently trying to track down details ofRay Price's stint at Wakefield Trinity for use in his article. If any of the Wakefield article contributors could help that would be hugely appreciated! --User:CumberlandsAshes81 14 September 2006.

Changed importance to High to match other SL clubs.

Surely if a player had died then he is no longer on the club's books?Zacitty (talk)16:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TheIsaac Cole article states that he played forWakefield Trinity in the 1910 Yorkshire Cup final, but the1910 Yorkshire Cup article doesn't mention. Did Isaac Cole play in the 1910 Yorkshire Cup final? Best regardsDynamoDegsy (talk)10:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left atTalk:Wakefield Trinity/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Followingseveral discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 13:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC).Substituted at 10:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

This page's title has needed updating ever since the club took the decision to ditch 'Wildcats' from their name and return to being Wakefield Trinity once again.— Precedingunsigned comment added by37.152.217.43 (talk)20:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an issue as different names can be found as their websitehttp://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/ and the chairman saying they want to be known as Wakefield Wildcats.Theanonymousentry (talk)09:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a history of the name of the club?Theanonymousentry (talk)07:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bump.Theanonymousentry (talk)12:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop muckin' about and change it to the historical name, i.e.Wakefield Trinity.— Precedingunsigned comment added by51.9.93.92 (talk)18:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The club website refers to it as theWakefield Trinity Wildcats, so while they've said they're going to drop it they haven't yet.Rehnn83^Talk08:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be renamedWakefield Trinity to conform with other rugby league club articles on Wikipedia such asWarrington Wolves,Wigan Warriors andCastleford Tigers etc..?Bwfcwarrior (talk)13:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes as that appears to be our MOS. Was moved in late November last year without discussion to this page from Wakefield Trinity Wildcats.Theanonymousentry (talk)12:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The current title is contrary to established style. --Mkativerata (talk)22:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How long do we leave this before moving it, or requesting a move?Theanonymousentry (talk)13:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Usually 7 days from opening the move request.Keith D (talk)14:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CanWP:IAR not be cited to move earlier if consensus points to a move being the preference?Bwfcwarrior (talk)18:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably if you are looking atsnow consensus.Keith D (talk)22:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a few days since the last comment here. Is it time to ask an administrator to move the page or is there not enough of a consensus yet in other people's opinion?Bwfcwarrior (talk)22:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I alsosupport a move. Either ask an admin to do it, or start a formal move process that takes 7 days.Mattlore (talk)23:03, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still learning the ropes here tbh, do I go toWP:RM, or do I need to stick a template on this talk page?Bwfcwarrior (talk)23:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, either follow the steps atWikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_a_single_page_move, or find an admin and ask them directly on their talk page if they will move it based on this discussion.Mattlore (talk)23:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, think I'll seek an admin as a further 7 day discussion seems unnecessary now.Bwfcwarrior (talk)23:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to move (and have) based on this discussion andWP:COMMONNAME.Nthep (talk)12:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class rugby league articles
• High-importance rugby league articles
• WikiProject Rugby league articles
• C-Class Yorkshire articles
• Mid-importance Yorkshire articles
• WikiProject Yorkshire articles